GROCKLES.COM welcomes you all to the world of Somerset Cricket.
Championship Data |
 T20 Cup Data |
Contact Us |
 Weather (There) |
 Weather (Here) |
 Fixture List 2009 |
 Grockle's Honour Board |
 Present Scorecard |
 Report Archives |
 Hugh Collis "Crouchend" Gallery |
Easy rules:
1. Respect other people's point of view
2. If you want to swear then your message won't be on the site for long and neither will you.
3. We're here to talk about cricket in general and Somerset in particular - banter is compulsory.
4. Bias is OK as long as its West Country in origin!!
Enjoy yourselves and everyone else will.
Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 10:29
Tonight's match is on Sky TV, which great for all except bloke. We can all do first-hand match reports.
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 10:37
There are a lot more people than Bloke who don't have (and indeed don't choose to have) Sky.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 10:41
He's more outspoken about it though! As a pedant, shouldn't the phrase be 'choose not to have'!
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 10:50
The phrases "not choose to have" and "choose not to have" are both equally acceptable but mean subtly different things. One is an active choice, the other is passive failure to act.
As a pedant, shouldn't a question terminate with a question mark?
As a pedant, shouldn't a question terminate with a question mark?
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 10:52
No, it was a statement?
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 10:54
Then why disguise it as an exclamation?
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Slow Left Chinaman (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 10:55
Well I'm glad it's on Sky! We've had a decent amount of games on the last couple of months.
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 10:56
Um, I have made my choice, and I don't have sky, therefore Botham is correct in my case at least. LoL is not to know whether or not I have made my choice, so he is not in the wrong either.
Not sure what punctuation to put on the end of this post!?
Not sure what punctuation to put on the end of this post!?
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 11:26
If anybody wants to watch on Sky come to my house.There is a moderate charge for entrance.
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 11:28
Don't let Sky find out, BR, or there'll be a less than moderate increase in your subscription! 
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 11:32
It's not a problem F.E I'm hooked up to next doors dish.
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 13:58
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 15:39
We are batting first.
Justin is fit again.
Looks like Banks has finished his run for Somerset and Waller is in.
I was wondering If Hildreth may have given way for somebody else but he hasn't, I do hope he scores some runs.
Justin is fit again.
Looks like Banks has finished his run for Somerset and Waller is in.
I was wondering If Hildreth may have given way for somebody else but he hasn't, I do hope he scores some runs.
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 15:55
Not a good start. Who is this Shantry guy? two overs for only three runs and, I assume, an 'assist,' in the dismissal of Craig who made only 2 off 11 balls (most unlike him.)
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 15:58
Hildreth has made way now Mike,first baller!
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 16:00
Im afraid that James is more a liability than an asset at present. We could really have done with him making it today. This is not a good start
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 16:03
Well we have other and still 30 overs to go
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 16:14
Yes, but after losing 8 wickets within the first 30 overs in the last game, conceding two wickets early on here is a little worrying.
Re: Pro 40 v Worcs
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 14 September, 2009 16:14
last home game, not last game.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
