Latest News:

Why Not Parthiv?

By Gaurang
March 8 2017

The recently concluded second Test at Banglore was a missed opportunity to prepare an all-condition Indian Test squad.  Clearly Wriddhiman Saha is the top choice for glove man for the Indian team and there is no doubt he deserved to walk back into the side after his understudy Parthiv Patel did a credible job both with the gloves and especially with the bat in the series against England.  However not giving Parthiv the chance to remain in the squad as back up keeper and back up opener is something the selectors will need to seriosly reconsider

Abhinav Mukund arguably deserved a comeback into the Test team with the weight of runs scored in the domestic first class season.  However, there were several players who scored a lot more than him and the sheer weight of his runs was not overwhelming.  For example Priyank Panchal of Gujarat scored nearly 500 more runs than Mukund in the Ranji season at an average of 87 compared to Mukund's 65. 

Maybe Mukund was picked because he was a left hander and India were looking to have a right hand-left hand opening combination.  In that case Parthiv Patel proved his worth just recently in the series against England with scores of 42, 64 not out, and 71 as an opener.  And it was not just the runs he scored but the manner in which he scored them that spoke volumes.  He looked at ease against the English quicks and spinners and when India were required to chase down 100 odd for a win in Mohali he slammed 11 fours and a six in leading India to victory at an exhilirating canter.  In Chennai he put on 152 with KL Rahul when India faced a formidable first innings score of 477 put up by England. 

By contrast when this writer saw Mukund play for Rest of India versus Gujarat in the Irani Trophy in Mumbai on a fairly docile Brabourne Stadium wicket even there he looked unsure against the rank medium pace swing of Chintan Gaja and when I saw he was included in the Indian squad as back up opener it definitly made me question that move.  Subsequently his failure in Bangalore only reinforced that doubt.

The Indian selectors need to start thinking about developing a squad that will be ready for all conditions.  Parthiv Patel with his versatility as back up wicket-keeper and back up opener can be used to fill two very crucial roles while only taking up one spot in the side, allowing the selectors to pick an extra bowler or batsman as desired to bring the best balance to the Indian squad.  Parthiv's fiesty nature, and his obvious fire in the belly, which allowed him to keep the faith and earn a Test recall after a record gap of 82 Test played by India before he made it back to the side, and then his immediate impact with bat and glove, indicate that the selectors missed a trick when they failed to pick him as the opening partner when Murali Vijay was injured again. 



View a Printer Friendly version of this Story.

Bookmark or share this story with:

Indian Cricket Fever
Why Not Parthiv?
Indian Cricket Fever (IP Logged)
08/03/2017 15:10
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017:03:28:19:21:58 by Birbal.

Re: Why Not Parthiv?
Birbal (IP Logged)
09/03/2017 23:55
Looks like Murali Vijay will be back for the 3rd and 4th Test... but Mukund is still in the squad...

Re: Why Not Parthiv?
Birbal (IP Logged)
08/12/2017 22:57
Parthiv picked for South Africa... glad to see my suggestion is being followed by Indian selectors...smiling smiley

Re: Why Not Parthiv?
Birbal (IP Logged)
29/01/2018 18:34
And he did a great job with his gutsy batting. His keeping in the second test was a bit under par...but he was really throwing himself around and doing a wonderful job in the final Test where he was promoted to OPEN in the batting and his rapid fire 16 in 15 balls ensured India got off to a decent start which Vijay and Rahul consolidated to 42-1 by end of the day.

Too bad he broke his finger... but then India had flown in Karthik... and under new law the substitute can be a wicketkeeper. Almost as if the team management knew this could happen...smiling smiley

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing

Indian Cricket Poll

Is Extending T20I Status To All 104 Affliate Countries A Good Idea

See results > Submit >>