Is he in?
Hunting Hampshire again
Is he in?
By Grockle
August 19 2008
Down to the Rosebowl for a pivotal Championship game - our 'game in hand'. Over 20 points is a must as long as the weather gives us the opportunity. Questions about Ben Phillips, Peter Trego and Steffan Jones leave the make-up of the side uncertain but whoever plays needs to give us a top perfromance.
Is he in?
August 19 2008
Down to the Rosebowl for a pivotal Championship game - our 'game in hand'. Over 20 points is a must as long as the weather gives us the opportunity. Questions about Ben Phillips, Peter Trego and Steffan Jones leave the make-up of the side uncertain but whoever plays needs to give us a top perfromance.
v Hampshire LVCC1 @ The Rosebowl Tuesday 20 August 2008
Rain has delayed the start of this game. A game we need to take a whole bunch of points in and gain revenge for our one day defeat on Sunday. There is no team information on the official site or Cricinfo at the present moment but we have most of it I would imagine.
Trescothick, Edwards(?), Langer, de Bruyn, Hildreth, Blackwell, Kieswetter, ?,?,Caddick, Willoughby
The question marks stand by Niel Edwards although I would expect him to play. The real question is which of our second line of seam attack will play? We have two places and FOUR bowlers fighting for a place. Peter Trego is not playing one day games, Ben Phillips seems to be carrying some sort of 'niggle', Steffan Jones is pushing through agressive batting and pacy bowling but can be expensive and Alfonso Thomas is doing very little wrong in any format. It is doubtful that we will see second spinning options so I would expect the choice to be between these four men.
But you never know....the mind of Justin is a very complex little place!
We do get started in the afternoon and we don't have our captain.
Marcus Trescothick, no Edwards, Zander de Bruyn (opening?), James Hildreth, Ian Blackwell, Peter Trego, Arul Suppiah, Craig Kieswetter, Alfonso Thomas, Wes Durston, Andrew Caddick, Charl Willoughby
Strange n'est pas? We aren't batting because Hampshire won the toss and decided to bat. No idea what the order will be at the moment but we have them at 112 for 4 with 2 wickets each for Willow and Trigger.
There was little more play on the first day but some excellent bowling from our whole attack with no-one going for more than 3 an over and wickets to the two above. Brilliant figures from Thomas - 7 overs for 9 and the pick of the bowlers was Peter Trego with 2 for 18 off his 7. Ian Blackwell weighed in with 17 off his 11 at 1.5 per over - that's what he can do Mr Langer!
Day 2
We ended the day with Hampshire on 113/4 and Lumb dangerously on 49 (but Carberry has gone at least - he loves us!!). The rain delayed the start and shortened the day but we seem to be away on time on day 2. Caddick and Willoughby are starting the session but it will probably be another 'stop/start' day as the rain clouds are whirling around the bottom half of the country. Rain affected Day 2 but we did get the game moving for at least part of the day.
Ian Blackwell took 'first blood' on Day 2 with the wicket of Dawson at 146. Then Caddick got the big scalp of Lumb but it took another 80 runs in partnership Ervine and the man passed his century before he was caught behind for 107. Mascarenhas put on 41 but each of our men came up with one as the home side lost all their remaining wickets for another 90 thanks to Thomas, Caddick, Blackwell and Willoughby. All out for 316 but it took most of the day and although Marcus and (surprisingly) Arul Suppiah faced a number of overs at the end of the day. It was really a start and then start again. They didn't lose a wicket and amassed 41 by the end of play. Big batting day tomorrow!!
Day 3
Batting the day out and some big scores were what we wanted, so losing Suppiah with only 14 added and then unusually losing de Bruyn cheaply (0!) on the same score was NOT what was required. Hampshire must have been hoping that Tomlinson (who took both - remember him?) was going to have another one of those days against us. However, Hildreth is coming out of his slump to some extent and he settled down to put some runs on with Mr T together they took the score to 142 before Banger went to Dawson.
Wes came in ahead of Ian and got involved in a mix up with Hildreth who was run out as he reached his 50 and his side reched 150 for 4! Bonus points looked a long way off and any kind of result in this even further. Another game for Blackwell to come in and take by the scruff. We've hoped for it all season. He'd bowled well in this game and the Surrey match as well but could he provide the batting strength we needed to put us back in this game and abo ve Notts in the table?
Well first of all he put 47 on with Durston before Wes went LBW to Tahir just before 200. He then put on another 54 with Kieswetter before he went to Tahir caught by Adams. Then he and Trego - the well rested duo - moved into another gear and moved the score to 339 before Trigger went to - you've guessed it - Tahir LBW for an excellent 58 off 51 balls! We ended the day on 385 for 7 with Ian unbeaten on 104 (100 off 168 balls 9 fours and 1 six) keeping up the move to 400 with Alfonso Thomas
Day 4
400 first, then smack it about Ian and then declare, get them in and try and bowl them out. 12 points for certain but more if possible.
Somerset went past 400 quickly before Mr Blackwell went for an excellent and important 129 at 423. However, Thomas was seeing the ball well and he took the score on to 436 with Caddick (who managed 1 in the partnership) before he went for really good 43. Charl came in and went to Dimitri first ball and we were done for 436. Now could we get among them well before they passed our total?
West Country hopes must have soared when Trego bowled Adams with only 26 up - but that was it well into the afternoon as Carberry and Lumb pitched anchor and took the score past 100 at less than three an over.
That's the way it stayed up until the declaration by the home side for 196 and the end of the game. But...12 points and we are Championship leaders going around the third bend with the finish in sight. 5 ahead of Notts - Trent Bridge is going to be a HUGE game!!
Bookmark or share this story with:
Digg
Delicious
Facebook
Reddit
StumbleuponRelated Articles:
Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grockles.com (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 10:14
Hunting Hampshire again
Hants at the Rose Bowl
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 18/08/2008 09:55
I suspect we will find the Rose Bowl wicket for the cc match against Hampshire this week somewhat out of its ordinary `low and slow` nature.
Pakistan leg-spinner Imran Tahir looked decidedly ineffectual on Taunton`s resuse of the `dead` Surrey championship wicket for yesterday`s Pro40 match, with figures of 0-47 at an economy rate of above 7 an over.
Yet he has taken 22 championship wickets in just three matches for Hampshire, and like all legspinners will obviously be looking for more bounce at the Rose Bowl tomorrow.
If the weather was `normal` August variety, I would be tempted to play Michael Munday, but with all this rain around feel this will not happen.
In other selections, Hampshire will probably bring back Michael Brown, Sean Ervine, James Tomlinson (not another 10 wickets please!) and Greg Lamb, compared with yesterday`s side. I notice, though, that John Crawley didn`t play yesterday or in the last championship match and wonder whether he is injured.
Pakistan leg-spinner Imran Tahir looked decidedly ineffectual on Taunton`s resuse of the `dead` Surrey championship wicket for yesterday`s Pro40 match, with figures of 0-47 at an economy rate of above 7 an over.
Yet he has taken 22 championship wickets in just three matches for Hampshire, and like all legspinners will obviously be looking for more bounce at the Rose Bowl tomorrow.
If the weather was `normal` August variety, I would be tempted to play Michael Munday, but with all this rain around feel this will not happen.
In other selections, Hampshire will probably bring back Michael Brown, Sean Ervine, James Tomlinson (not another 10 wickets please!) and Greg Lamb, compared with yesterday`s side. I notice, though, that John Crawley didn`t play yesterday or in the last championship match and wonder whether he is injured.
Re: Hants at the Rose Bowl
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 18/08/2008 10:17
Yesterday was ludicrous. It as dark by 7, freezing cold with a really chilly breeze. Most peoplle were in fleeces and my mate even suggested popping home (round the corner) to get some gloves at about 4:30!!
If it's anything like that this week then a spinner is a waste of time except as a run saver I'm afraid because they'll get nothing off the pitch.
If it's anything like that this week then a spinner is a waste of time except as a run saver I'm afraid because they'll get nothing off the pitch.
Re: Hants at the Rose Bowl
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 18/08/2008 10:32
Let's hope Jones is back in the CC side; he seems more effective than Phillips with both ball and bat and his endless energy lifts the rest of the side.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hants at the Rose Bowl
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 18/08/2008 10:41
I'm not sure Ben is well. He seems to be bowling well within himself and fielding in non pressure positions. Jonah was really producing some pace yesterday but he can be costly, though there's no quesation that he gives everything every time he plays.
And he can bat. It isn't luck that gets him scores, he'll straight drive the best if they give him the ball to do it to.
We need that aggression if we aren't going to use Peter as an allrounder.
And he can bat. It isn't luck that gets him scores, he'll straight drive the best if they give him the ball to do it to.
We need that aggression if we aren't going to use Peter as an allrounder.
Re: Hants at the Rose Bowl
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 18/08/2008 13:30
"Let's hope Jones is back in the CC side; he seems more effective than Phillips with both ball and bat and his endless energy lifts the rest of the side."
Hear, hear, LoL! In view of the clean bill of health that AH gave everyone before the Surrey game, Jonah's non-selection was baffling in the extreme (to me at least.)
Conversely, I feel that Jonah has been a little too expensive in recent one-day games, though, and wonder whether we ought not to rest him for the remaining CC fixtures (a la Caddy)?
As for the Rose Bowl pitch, I don't think it's really a big turner, usually. I think bounce will be difficult for their groundsman to provide, given the November weather. Having said that, a lack of bounce can be very useful for flipper/slider type balls and even the googly for that matter. Let's hope Imran is of the type that mainly only has his stock wrist-spinner, as that would probably be somewhat negated by a lack of bounce.
Hear, hear, LoL! In view of the clean bill of health that AH gave everyone before the Surrey game, Jonah's non-selection was baffling in the extreme (to me at least.)
Conversely, I feel that Jonah has been a little too expensive in recent one-day games, though, and wonder whether we ought not to rest him for the remaining CC fixtures (a la Caddy)?
As for the Rose Bowl pitch, I don't think it's really a big turner, usually. I think bounce will be difficult for their groundsman to provide, given the November weather. Having said that, a lack of bounce can be very useful for flipper/slider type balls and even the googly for that matter. Let's hope Imran is of the type that mainly only has his stock wrist-spinner, as that would probably be somewhat negated by a lack of bounce.
Re: Hants at the Rose Bowl
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 18/08/2008 13:39
Giles White, who played briefly for Somerset in the early 1990s and is yet another product of Millfield School, will be in charge of Hampshire for their cc match against us. He takes over from Paul Terry, who announced his resignation as director of cricket last week.
White, who moved to Hampshire in 1994, has been Terry`s No.2.
White, who moved to Hampshire in 1994, has been Terry`s No.2.
Re: Hants at the Rose Bowl
Posted by: Palairet (IP Logged)
Date: 18/08/2008 14:17
One 'Old Millfieldian' succeeding another, then!
Re: Hants at the Rose Bowl
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 18/08/2008 18:15
Feel free to take some of our weather. Plus 34C & sweltering.
Too much of a good thing !
Grizzzly
Too much of a good thing !
Grizzzly
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 10:17
Well it's raining in Southampton it seems.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 10:19
[www.metoffice.gov.uk]
Met Office forecast for today is poor (above).
Tomorrow is not too bad. Thursday and Friday are fine.
The Thursday forecast is in direct contradiction to the BBC one, which threatens 'persistent rain on the south coast.'
Everyone seems to agree that, like last week, Friday will definitely be fine.
Realistically, I think our best chance of a 'good,' outcome is another maximum points draw.
That would put us nine points ahead of Notts from equal games played, with the game at Trent Bridge up next.. In other words, win at Trent Bridge and Notts hopes would be all but ended..
Of course, Durham remain a threat. They're at Sussex this week, where they have an execrable record.
Met Office forecast for today is poor (above).
Tomorrow is not too bad. Thursday and Friday are fine.
The Thursday forecast is in direct contradiction to the BBC one, which threatens 'persistent rain on the south coast.'
Everyone seems to agree that, like last week, Friday will definitely be fine.
Realistically, I think our best chance of a 'good,' outcome is another maximum points draw.
That would put us nine points ahead of Notts from equal games played, with the game at Trent Bridge up next.. In other words, win at Trent Bridge and Notts hopes would be all but ended..
Of course, Durham remain a threat. They're at Sussex this week, where they have an execrable record.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 10:20
However, the actual met office rainfall radar for the UK suggests that there shouldn't be too much wet stuff around Southampton, right at the minute.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Kingston Black (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 10:20
I'm at work about 6 miles away from the Rose Bowl and although it was drizzling, it's now brightened up somewhat. Would expect them to be able to at least make a start soon.
KB
KB
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 10:26
The weather report was pretty hopeful KB ezpecially this afternoon. Can only get the prayer mat out I suppose!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 10:49
Looking for a webcam in Soton led me here, to Leeds. Still, it's quite interesting.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Kingston Black (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 11:00
Still no more rain, but lots of glowering cloud, interspersed by the odd short burst of sunshine. Keep your fingers crossed for 1230.
KB
KB
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 11:54
Play will begin at 1:30pm following an early lunch, as per the Beeb.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:22
Langer having a fitness test on a pulled back and Munday in the frame because they seem worried about the wicket and Tahir's perfromances on it. Hmmm
The site is making a big thing of us being able to go past the leaders if we gain FOUR points in this game because this is our game in hand. I hope we're expecting a hell of a lot more than FOUR points from this one!!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:19:12:25:53 by Grockle.
The site is making a big thing of us being able to go past the leaders if we gain FOUR points in this game because this is our game in hand. I hope we're expecting a hell of a lot more than FOUR points from this one!!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:19:12:25:53 by Grockle.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:36
CricInfo has Durston in for Langer with Caddy in charge.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:37
Hants won toss and will bat.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Coy (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:37
Trescothick, Suppiah, de Bruyn, Hildreth, Durston, Blackwell, Kieswetter, Trego, Thomas, Caddick, Willoughby
this is the full team
this is the full team
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:42
We lost the toss yet again, but this time Hants chose to bat.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:49
I'm really confused.
Is the up-shot that Wes AND Arul have replaced Langer and Phillips?
I wonder if that's a case of them picking both of Wes and Arul to try to replace JL's batting?
I hope Arul has not been picked primarily as a second spinner, because that would be a really grave reflection on things a propos Michael Munday, plus I do not believe that Arul is penetrative enough with the ball to take many wickets on anything other than a bunsen burner. And hopefully, given that they won the toss, it isn't that.
Very pleased that Wes has been given a chance.
Not sure who will open though, Arul with Marcus? That means Neil Edwards passed over. Again, the consideration is, presumably, Arul as a slow bowling option in that particular head-to-head for selection?
All very interesting indeed.
We're going to get a little taste of life without Langer, both as captain and as a batsman...
Is the up-shot that Wes AND Arul have replaced Langer and Phillips?
I wonder if that's a case of them picking both of Wes and Arul to try to replace JL's batting?
I hope Arul has not been picked primarily as a second spinner, because that would be a really grave reflection on things a propos Michael Munday, plus I do not believe that Arul is penetrative enough with the ball to take many wickets on anything other than a bunsen burner. And hopefully, given that they won the toss, it isn't that.
Very pleased that Wes has been given a chance.
Not sure who will open though, Arul with Marcus? That means Neil Edwards passed over. Again, the consideration is, presumably, Arul as a slow bowling option in that particular head-to-head for selection?
All very interesting indeed.
We're going to get a little taste of life without Langer, both as captain and as a batsman...
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:49
Quote:Frome Exile
CricInfo has Durston in for Langer with Caddy in charge.
On second thoughts, a more sensible interpretation would be Suppiah for Langer and Durston for Phillips. But I'm still a little surprised that Edwards didn't come in for the Chief.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:51
And if Caddy's leading again, I wonder if that does suggest that Banger is not interested in the job of leading SCCC?
Given that Caddy can hardly be a long-term replacement for JL, that would leave the question of the succession completely open...
Are there any in-house candidates?
Given that Caddy can hardly be a long-term replacement for JL, that would leave the question of the succession completely open...
Are there any in-house candidates?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:55
I believe Andy is the Club's official Vice-Captain, AG.
I also believe it's fairly common practice for players to eschew captaincy responsibilities during their benefit year, so MT's non-leadership may be indicative of nothing more than temporary unavailability.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:19:12:57:15 by Frome Exile.
I also believe it's fairly common practice for players to eschew captaincy responsibilities during their benefit year, so MT's non-leadership may be indicative of nothing more than temporary unavailability.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:19:12:57:15 by Frome Exile.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: tufnell parka (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 12:56
why is langer not playing? this is our biggest cc game of the season
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: tufnell parka (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 13:00
thanks
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Tractor (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 13:12
... and no Jonesy again!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 13:14
Their leading run-scorer (and only centurion bar Pietersen and Pothas) is missing for them, so that perhaps cancels out Langer's absence to some extent.
With only Pothas of this XI averaging higher than 33, it could be a good time to play them.
With only Pothas of this XI averaging higher than 33, it could be a good time to play them.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 13:17
Who is missing for them, FE?
If this is a bunsen burner, then we need to only bat once..
If this is a bunsen burner, then we need to only bat once..
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 13:26
crikey, starting to look as though these two are going to bat all day...
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 13:54
BOBO strikes. That will surprise BJ.
Is there any commentary anywhere? I've had a trawl of BBC Sport and can't find anything.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Is there any commentary anywhere? I've had a trawl of BBC Sport and can't find anything.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: averageside (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 13:56
Strange that Trescothick is not captaining.. Doesnt make him a potential captain if hes still playing when Langer leaves.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:01
Quote:AGod
Who is missing for them, FE?
Michael Brown, who has 800 runs at 40 from 23 first-class knocks this season.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:02
Another very parsimonious beginning from Alfonso. He seems to be making a habit of starting like this. Good to see.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:03
Caddick is the SCCC official VC. So no surprise.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:04
Didn't I mention that an hour ago? 
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:14
Need to dispose of Lumb quickly, since he is hurrying along. The openers staying in was not too bad because they were going really slowly, but Lumb needs to go.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:25
Need to start taking wickets for bonus point reasons even if they are not yet getting away from us.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:32
Well, JL has been making only scant use of Pete in recent weeks, yet Mr Caddick seems very keen on bowling him. And, one imagines, Pete is enjoying himself…
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:37
Trego needs only one more wicket for his first bonus point of the match.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:40
Anyone still rueing the decision to rest Peter on Sunday?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:41
You did indeed mention that Caddie was VC a while ago, FE. However, you were ignored. I'll acknowledge your copyright, though!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:45
Pleased, surprised and relieved that - so far - Mr Caddick has not seen fit to take on a disproportionate amount of the bowling.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:46
Enter, the great IDB..
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:49
Lumb is bound to get a fifty
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:50
Incidentally, Mr Rose said the other day that Pete;
"Needs to take more wickets to realise his England ambitions."
Well, Pete has now got 22 wickets at less than 22 for the season. And no, he does not have a bad strike rate. Rather, he just hasn't bowled that much. A mis-judgement to a certain extent?
I think so.
Certainly, he usually carries more menace than Ben Phillips, who is, largely, a containing type bowler.
"Needs to take more wickets to realise his England ambitions."
Well, Pete has now got 22 wickets at less than 22 for the season. And no, he does not have a bad strike rate. Rather, he just hasn't bowled that much. A mis-judgement to a certain extent?
I think so.
Certainly, he usually carries more menace than Ben Phillips, who is, largely, a containing type bowler.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 14:54
Quote:Nailsea_Fizz
Lumb is bound to get a fifty
What makes you say that? He's only got 4 in 21 innings this season.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 15:00
I think I can guess why he said it, FE.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 15:01
Perhaps we should just put Alfonso in tandem with Ian and strangle the life out of this innings?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 15:27
77 off 37 overs, 15 of which have been maidens.
Must be riveting to watch !!
Grizzzly
Must be riveting to watch !!
Grizzzly
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 15:28
Why was tea taken in the middle of an over? Is it raining again?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 15:44
It wasn't according to the Beeb. Suspect Cricinfo got it wrong.
p.s. Is it just me or is anybody else beginning to suspect that this pitch is a total and utter dirge?
Just hope we show the necessary patience on it, when we bat...
p.s. Is it just me or is anybody else beginning to suspect that this pitch is a total and utter dirge?
Just hope we show the necessary patience on it, when we bat...
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 15:53
Benham b Willoughby 15.
The end of a long occupation of the crease.
I wonder if Willow is operating in Whitgift mode? That is bowling spin? (just thinking about the comments earlier about how we were worried about the pitch and its bunsen burner potential.)
The end of a long occupation of the crease.
I wonder if Willow is operating in Whitgift mode? That is bowling spin? (just thinking about the comments earlier about how we were worried about the pitch and its bunsen burner potential.)
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 16:00
Pothas c Thomas b Willoughby 0.
Whatever he's bowling, it's working...
Whatever he's bowling, it's working...
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 16:02
Great performance by all today, with two to Trego and two to Willoughby, though that Blackwell is leaking more than one run per over.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 16:03
Top stuff this; their only batter with any form gone for nought. Keep it up, lads.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Kingston Black (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 16:05
Sorry to report that it's now pouring down just a few miles from the Rose Bowl. Could well be the end of it today I'm afraid.
KB
KB
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 16:05
night-watchman in now???
Is the light threatening, I wonder?
Must aim to wrap them up for no more than 180 now, with a view to batting once and then trying to force a victory on the final day. (I'm anticipating some more time will be lost to rain during the match.)
Is the light threatening, I wonder?
Must aim to wrap them up for no more than 180 now, with a view to batting once and then trying to force a victory on the final day. (I'm anticipating some more time will be lost to rain during the match.)
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 16:13
Nailsea - your earlier reverse hex is about to fail.
Hang you head.... etc etc
Hang you head.... etc etc
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Kingston Black (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 16:40
I think so, judging by the downpour that happened where I am. However, it only lasted 10 minutes and has now stopped. Considerably brighter now as well. We might get a bit more tonight but I would imagine that the outfield is pretty wet.
KB
KB
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 19/08/2008 20:18
And what glorious news! The opener we seem to be without at the Rosebowl made a hundred at the County Ground against Young MCC today - whooppee! I bet he's over the moon with his score.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 08:40
Last season our first three batsmen, Trescothick, Edwards and Langer, gave us a consistently good start to our innings. Now it seems we need only one of them, which I find somewhat surprising.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 08:58
I wonder if the powers-that-be consider Neil to be culpable to some degree in the 'mis-hap,' which has befallen him and if the decision to omit him is somehow reflective of this?
One other thought that occurred to me;
We might be expecting a very low scoring game in this one.
If so, the powers that be might have decided that a right/left hand opening combination might have advantages in producing a few stray deliveries early in the piece as bowlers have to adjust their lines?
I guess the other thing at foot may simply be that the powers-that-be appear particularly keen to promote Arul's chances in the team at the moment. Some of us have fears as to what the exact motivation behind that may be. Though it could be a very simple motivation that they increasingly believe that Arul is good enough.
One thing we can be sure of is that neither he nor Wes will keep a fit JL out of the next CC game, so this is a very big match for both men as a maximum of one of them will survive to the next game, assuming JL is fit.
One final thought - perhaps JL's back injury may be opportune in terms of the one-day side? Someone else (not Caddy either) will get a chance to lead and that could be welcome.
One other thought that occurred to me;
We might be expecting a very low scoring game in this one.
If so, the powers that be might have decided that a right/left hand opening combination might have advantages in producing a few stray deliveries early in the piece as bowlers have to adjust their lines?
I guess the other thing at foot may simply be that the powers-that-be appear particularly keen to promote Arul's chances in the team at the moment. Some of us have fears as to what the exact motivation behind that may be. Though it could be a very simple motivation that they increasingly believe that Arul is good enough.
One thing we can be sure of is that neither he nor Wes will keep a fit JL out of the next CC game, so this is a very big match for both men as a maximum of one of them will survive to the next game, assuming JL is fit.
One final thought - perhaps JL's back injury may be opportune in terms of the one-day side? Someone else (not Caddy either) will get a chance to lead and that could be welcome.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 09:17
Neil`s `mis-hap`, to use your euphemism AG, may well have had an influence on team selection for Southampton - but not in the way you are suggesting.
The matter was concluded at Taunton Deane yesterday, and in such instances, the magistrates can ask for witnesses to be present - although, in reality, they rarely call them at this late stage.
Playing for the Seconds at Taunton yesterday would have allowed NE to be on hand; travelling to Southampton the day before would not.
The matter was concluded at Taunton Deane yesterday, and in such instances, the magistrates can ask for witnesses to be present - although, in reality, they rarely call them at this late stage.
Playing for the Seconds at Taunton yesterday would have allowed NE to be on hand; travelling to Southampton the day before would not.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Kingston Black (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 09:52
Thanks for that CJM - It all makes a bit more sense now.
KB
KB
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 10:17
Well that's a much happier reason for the exclusion CJM.
Ref the leadership AG. Not gonna happen. There is one captain at Somerset and there will be for the next 18 months at least. MT will not be next in line and Caddy will lead when JL can't.
It's a case of getting used to it I'm afraid people. If you want to speculate on captaincy then you are looking towards the 2010 season before there is any kind of planned change. (And it won't be Marcus)
Ref the leadership AG. Not gonna happen. There is one captain at Somerset and there will be for the next 18 months at least. MT will not be next in line and Caddy will lead when JL can't.
It's a case of getting used to it I'm afraid people. If you want to speculate on captaincy then you are looking towards the 2010 season before there is any kind of planned change. (And it won't be Marcus)
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 10:25
Hildreth for 2010 and thereafter is my hunch.
If Langer can't play in any one-day games, I'm not at all sure that Caddick will captain, given that he often misses such games. In such circumstances Trescothick is the more likely candidate in my opinion.
Now it's time for today's first wicket(s).
If Langer can't play in any one-day games, I'm not at all sure that Caddick will captain, given that he often misses such games. In such circumstances Trescothick is the more likely candidate in my opinion.
Now it's time for today's first wicket(s).
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 10:32
You mis-understood me, Grockle. I simply meant that, if JL is unfit to play in the one-day games coming up, somebody else will have to lead - and that won't be Caddy unless we're suddenly going to pick him because he's the captain?
Moreover, if JL's back is a little bit dodgy but not terminally so, it would seem to make little sense to risk him in the remaining one-day games?
What I meant is that we, the fans, will get a chance to look at somebody else lead the one-day team (if JL is unfit.) Of course, by definition, Mr Rose and the cricket committee would get the same thing.
Moreover, if JL's back is a little bit dodgy but not terminally so, it would seem to make little sense to risk him in the remaining one-day games?
What I meant is that we, the fans, will get a chance to look at somebody else lead the one-day team (if JL is unfit.) Of course, by definition, Mr Rose and the cricket committee would get the same thing.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 10:35
Lumb is getting to be a pain in the neck. His needs to be shortened soon. Not literally, of course.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 10:42
re: the earlier one day debate I would also like to point out that, theoretically, Justin Langer will NOT be available for next year's FPT Trophy games, either. This is because he is supposed to be in India with the IPL.*
*In reality, I do not expect Justin to be more successful than the likes of Ricky Ponting of Jacques Kallis in that league. Those latter two, along with Rahul Dravid, were regarded as high-profile (and cost) 'failures,' in the IPL. I can't really see a logical reason to expect JL to be better in the IPL than Kallis or Ponting?
*In reality, I do not expect Justin to be more successful than the likes of Ricky Ponting of Jacques Kallis in that league. Those latter two, along with Rahul Dravid, were regarded as high-profile (and cost) 'failures,' in the IPL. I can't really see a logical reason to expect JL to be better in the IPL than Kallis or Ponting?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 10:53
I wonder if Hants are batting so slowly as a deliberate tactic to ensure that there is as much wear and tear as possible for Imran to bowl on?
Perhaps they're hoping to bat for 150 overs even if they only score 300, for instance?
It's certainly frustrating to have only four wickets in more than 60 overs..
Perhaps they're hoping to bat for 150 overs even if they only score 300, for instance?
It's certainly frustrating to have only four wickets in more than 60 overs..
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 11:12
Is it still 120 overs available to get our bonus points, or has it reverted to 100?
I don't think this question has even crossed my mind on any previous occasion this season!
I don't think this question has even crossed my mind on any previous occasion this season!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 11:18
The mighty man strikes
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 11:26
Trigger?
Let me see.
Blackie,well done sunshine.
Get these rabbits out and we're home and hosed.
Let me see.
Blackie,well done sunshine.
Get these rabbits out and we're home and hosed.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Blub (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 11:32
The Times this morning noted that there was "tennis ball" bounce yesterday. Given that Blackie and Arul appear to be bowling in tandem at the moment, could we rue the decision not to include our Leggie?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: fRed (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 11:44
Tennis ball bounce? I think that means hard on top, wet below. High water table possibly?
Cricket's the winner.
Cricket's the winner.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 11:45
First innings points are available for the first 130 overs, AG.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 11:51
I've a feeling that this game may well be an epic struggle on a pitch on which it seems to be very possible to stay in but a good deal more difficult to score.
Regrettably, that's probably the kind of pitch that is made for Mr Langer and his adhesive qualities.
On the other hand, on very slow pitches players who rely on timing tend to be neutralised. Those that can bring brute force to bear when necessary have a greater chance of being able to score at a reasonable rate. Paging Mr Blackwell...
Regrettably, that's probably the kind of pitch that is made for Mr Langer and his adhesive qualities.
On the other hand, on very slow pitches players who rely on timing tend to be neutralised. Those that can bring brute force to bear when necessary have a greater chance of being able to score at a reasonable rate. Paging Mr Blackwell...
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 12:00
btw.. Blub.. the term tennis ball bounce is usually employed to describe a slow, looping type of bounce as opposed to, say, the kind of steepling bounce that one would expect someone like Andrew Caddick to extract from a cricket pitch with a hard ball.
That type of bounce is not necessarily massively helpful to a spinner, either, if the slowness means that batsmen can adjust to the bounce.
Speaking of hard balls, I believe a new ball must be due soon. We really must push through the rest of this line-up. I think our chances of a win depend, substantially, on only batting once.
That type of bounce is not necessarily massively helpful to a spinner, either, if the slowness means that batsmen can adjust to the bounce.
Speaking of hard balls, I believe a new ball must be due soon. We really must push through the rest of this line-up. I think our chances of a win depend, substantially, on only batting once.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 12:03
Caddy bowled the over before lunch, the 83rd - I suspect with the new ball.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 12:38
LoL - I'm not saying MT will not captain on the odd occasion if JL can't play in a one dayer (and I'm not even certain he'll accept it then) but Marcus will not take the captaincy on anything but a one off basis under any circumstances.
Hildreth? Trego? If it's home grown but I think we may see Somerset gong outside the county again after JL. The plan of an 80%/90% home grown youth side coming through seems to have been thrown out as we've neared the top of the Championship.
I suppose a small county with limited finance may have to use the offer of captaincy as a sweetener to get the big name player to come to Taunton. Depends on how funding changes of course.
Hildreth? Trego? If it's home grown but I think we may see Somerset gong outside the county again after JL. The plan of an 80%/90% home grown youth side coming through seems to have been thrown out as we've neared the top of the Championship.
I suppose a small county with limited finance may have to use the offer of captaincy as a sweetener to get the big name player to come to Taunton. Depends on how funding changes of course.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 12:41
Yes, Grockle, I agree with you that there is a strong likelihood that we will go outside the current ranks.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 12:54
Grockle: I agree entirely with your first paragraph, but I hope (and I suspect that you too hope) that we shall not be looking elsewhere for a captain after Langer finishes.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 12:55
need to average one wicket every 11 overs now or will not get full bonus points. Come on, the 'set!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 13:20
At last!! Bank on the biggest of all men to rip out their century maker!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 13:23
Three more wickets in the next 38 overs and we're top of the table (again!).
I'm going to do an FE and pop out for a while and hope things work out as they should in my absence.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
I'm going to do an FE and pop out for a while and hope things work out as they should in my absence.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 13:48
There's one more.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 14:40
Well done, LoL. You can come home now!
Oh.......well done to the lads, too.
Oh.......well done to the lads, too.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 14:42
That totally fooled them - I didn't go out after all. The memsahib changed her mind - they do that, don't they?
And now we really are top of the table and must stay there until the end of September (2108)
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
And now we really are top of the table and must stay there until the end of September (2108)
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 15:00
Well done lads,a great bowling performance.
Lovely to see Blackie having a good old bowl and doing well too.
Welcome back Ian,let's get those batting points now.
Lovely to see Blackie having a good old bowl and doing well too.
Welcome back Ian,let's get those batting points now.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 15:17
Is that really Suppiah opening?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 15:25
I would imagine so: he's done it before, hasn't he?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 15:40
Bad Light stopped play at 26-0.
Grizzzly
Grizzzly
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 16:03
He certainly has, FE.
On one such occasion, I believe he was run out for 99.
On one such occasion, I believe he was run out for 99.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 16:19
and off again.
Rain stopped play at 41-0.
359 more to go for maximum batting points....
Rain stopped play at 41-0.
359 more to go for maximum batting points....
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 16:29
Friday's met office forecast has been amended in a disadvantageous way. Might have to get most of our 359 tomorrow..
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 16:35
So another unconverted fifty then!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 22:20
It is difficult to equate this `welcome back Blackie` and `good to see Blackie having a good bowl` line on this thread with the actual facts of the 2008 championship to date.
He has played in all 12 matches, bowled 292 overs before the current game and taken 17 wickets at an average of 40.
Only Willow has bowled more overs at 350, and Ben Phillips in third place is 85 overs behind Blackie. Even in the last match, our man bowled 24 of the 123 overs in the Surrey innings, with only Andy C ahead of him.
It strikes me that this adds up to pretty much `a good bowl` in most people`s terms.
He has played in all 12 matches, bowled 292 overs before the current game and taken 17 wickets at an average of 40.
Only Willow has bowled more overs at 350, and Ben Phillips in third place is 85 overs behind Blackie. Even in the last match, our man bowled 24 of the 123 overs in the Surrey innings, with only Andy C ahead of him.
It strikes me that this adds up to pretty much `a good bowl` in most people`s terms.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 22:31
I'm sorry you seem to have misunderstood my post CjM.
I'd have said the same had it been of any bowler who had been out of sorts and searching for form.
Nothing hidden in my meaning,just a case of welcome back to form old bean.
Anything wrong with that?
I'd have said the same had it been of any bowler who had been out of sorts and searching for form.
Nothing hidden in my meaning,just a case of welcome back to form old bean.
Anything wrong with that?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 22:52
A good day for all the bowlers.
But like you Jim it's good to see Ian Blackwell bowling with such good figures of.
24 overs 9 maidens 39 runs 2 wickets and the run rate of 1.62
He must be very relaxed about something to keep concentration for all those overs.
.
But like you Jim it's good to see Ian Blackwell bowling with such good figures of.
24 overs 9 maidens 39 runs 2 wickets and the run rate of 1.62
He must be very relaxed about something to keep concentration for all those overs.
.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/08/2008 23:15
Careful Mike,you could disturb the hornets nest with comments like that.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 03:16
Spot on with your last sentence Mike.
Grizzzly
Grizzzly
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 06:26
With 2 days gone we are in a sort of Surrey situation except that Hants don't have Ramprakash.and the weather sounds no better. Realistically all we hope for is a 12 point draw with an outside chance of a win. If we get a full day today then at 4 an over we would end up at 420. It seems to be a 400 and declare job, but then the Notts and Durham games are really win but don't lose games.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 06:37
Why Jim?
That is the best bowling figures Ian has had for a while.
That is the best bowling figures Ian has had for a while.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 07:48
Reading yesterday`s reports, I see that Marcus and Arul had to go on and off for rain and bad light three times in just 10 overs.
So they did pretty well to retain their concentration.
So they did pretty well to retain their concentration.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 08:33
I don't agree with the implied suggestion that Ian has somehow bowled economically because JL isn't out there leading the side. Ian habitually bowls with very good economy. I saw him bowl in a very similar vein at Horsham.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 09:45
met office has changed Friday's forecast right back to what it originally was - fine and dry.
Some showers predicted today.
Some showers predicted today.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 09:45
I don't see that implied anywhere AG.
If we can't welcome a much respected player back to form then that really is a sad day for the fan off the bank.
Chill out lads and lasses,nothing sinister meant from me.
And always remember,just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they're not after you.
If we can't welcome a much respected player back to form then that really is a sad day for the fan off the bank.
Chill out lads and lasses,nothing sinister meant from me.
And always remember,just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they're not after you.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 10:37
I'm not at all convinced that, in terms of first-class cricket, Ian has been out of form with the ball, Jim. Certainly, he was not even remotely out of form at Horsham and Grockle has suggested that Ian bowled very well against Surrey too.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 11:10
flaming Tomlinson again. Not a good start to the day.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 11:11
He might be needed more with the bat very soon in this one, if the penant is to be won.Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 11:45
This was the best form he's shown in a long time AG,it is good to see him bowling so well again.
Are we going to have this sort of debate every time somebody congratulates a player?
Much more important matters at hand.
Let's not split hairs to try and prove a point.
Are we going to have this sort of debate every time somebody congratulates a player?
Much more important matters at hand.
Let's not split hairs to try and prove a point.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 12:31
Banger goes.
That must be rather exciting for the young man who's got him.
Careful now lads.
That must be rather exciting for the young man who's got him.
Careful now lads.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 12:43
Dawson was a pain in the neck in the one-day game, too, succeeding where Imran had failed. Perhaps he is destined to be a cricketer of some substance..?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: tufnell parka (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 12:45
The Guardian's blog stated that Ian Blackwell was by far and away the pick of the Somerset bowlers.
Apologies if this has been posted.
Intriguing game ahead.
Apologies if this has been posted.
Intriguing game ahead.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 12:49
Good to hear, TP.
Does anyone know what time they went off for lunch? (I'm tryign to calculate the time at which things will re-start.)
Tomorrow's forecast is promising, all of a sudden, so if we could get a lead of any substance today, then one never knows what might happen on the final day..
... On the other hand, there should not be enough time left in the game for them to put us under pressure, so I am content with things at the moment.
Does anyone know what time they went off for lunch? (I'm tryign to calculate the time at which things will re-start.)
Tomorrow's forecast is promising, all of a sudden, so if we could get a lead of any substance today, then one never knows what might happen on the final day..
... On the other hand, there should not be enough time left in the game for them to put us under pressure, so I am content with things at the moment.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: tufnell parka (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 12:59
I'm gazing out of the office window in Southwark at the blue skies wishing I was in Southampton.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:04
If the rest of the day goes particularly well, I might yet sack off Friday's work and make the journey down there.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:09
2.13pm - why aren't they playing?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:13
It was a late lunch but I am not sure how late. Do you know when they went off, SP?
I think Jim posted at 31 minutes past one to say that Banger was out, so I assume that had only just happened. In which case, they might not be back on until 2:20pm?
I think Jim posted at 31 minutes past one to say that Banger was out, so I assume that had only just happened. In which case, they might not be back on until 2:20pm?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:16
Thanks - I see they're back on now - I had an early lunch myself, so didn't see when they went off...complicated, this game, isn't it!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: tufnell parka (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:20
A text from a Hampshire-supporting friend at the game
"Suppiah got triggered - lbw to one that pitched outside leg, de Bruyn chopped on and Trescothick top-edged a slog-sweep after having broken short leg's helmet earlier on. Hildreth looks very good"
"Suppiah got triggered - lbw to one that pitched outside leg, de Bruyn chopped on and Trescothick top-edged a slog-sweep after having broken short leg's helmet earlier on. Hildreth looks very good"
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: tufnell parka (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:21
A text from a Hampshire-supporting friend at the game
1) Suppiah triggered to one that pitched outside leg
2) De Bruyn chopped on
3) Banger top-edged a slogsweep after earlier breaking short leg's helmet
4) Hildreth looks very very good
1) Suppiah triggered to one that pitched outside leg
2) De Bruyn chopped on
3) Banger top-edged a slogsweep after earlier breaking short leg's helmet
4) Hildreth looks very very good
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: tufnell parka (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:22
so impatient i posted it twice!
i can confirm it is two very's to hildreth's name
i can confirm it is two very's to hildreth's name
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:24
We continued the trend from Horsham of losing apparently set batsmen right on the cusp of an interval. Hopefully there will be no further such dismissals in this one..
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:32
god, that must be annoying for young James. Very ill-timed run out.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 13:34
Someone spoke too soon again and hastened a run out.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 14:23
Two questions;
1) What does Michael Carberry bowl?
2) Isn't him having ten overs already a bit of a surprise?
1) What does Michael Carberry bowl?
2) Isn't him having ten overs already a bit of a surprise?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 14:28
Off breaks. Took 7 first class wickets with best 2/85.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 14:37
well, one point notched up.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 15:07
2 points.
A minimum of 9 from this game now look all but certain.
A minimum of 9 from this game now look all but certain.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 15:07
I think you mean two
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 15:09
and the interval curse strikes once again
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 15:13
nine, LoL, I meant nine (I'm counting the points already won and a minimum outcome of a drawn match.)
And, yes, the interval business has struck again. Can it just be chance - or is it a lack of concentration? Of the past six first innings intervals on the road - five (all but the close of play yesterday) have a wicket to their name.
And, yes, the interval business has struck again. Can it just be chance - or is it a lack of concentration? Of the past six first innings intervals on the road - five (all but the close of play yesterday) have a wicket to their name.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 15:18
If Pete's is the next wicket to fall, do we expect the GREAT IDB to step on the gas?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 15:28
If you look at the timing of my previous post, AG, you will note that I was responding to your earlier post about our having secured one so far. I agree that nine are probably guaranteed, but I hope we press on for maximum batting points now, just in case we slip up in our second innings.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 15:53
Given their predicament in the table, it's conceivable that Hants might take a very negative approach to their 2nd innings, which could work in our favour.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:11
Well... I don't know about you chaps but I would say that SCCC would have NO CHANCE of winning this game, but for the combined contributions of Ian and Pete.
Over to you, Mr Rose, to address the selectorial calumny that you have visited on these two gentlemen...
Over to you, Mr Rose, to address the selectorial calumny that you have visited on these two gentlemen...
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:12
Full batting points anyone?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:13
Thankfully they have been rested and ready to go
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:26
Pete yet again proving to all concerned that he is a "genuine all rounder" who should NOT be batting at 8.
I really think that Somerset would benefit more if he was in the top 6 at least.
I really think that Somerset would benefit more if he was in the top 6 at least.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Blub (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:38
In fairness bo, I think that with this team, any number of players could bat at 5,6,7 or 8. Personally I find it quite reassuring that bobo comes in at 8 as he seems a little more consistent than the others at the moment - and it must really annoy the opposition to see him there!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: BVI Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:40
Agree with BO, the man has averaged so highly the past few seasons and always scores at around a run a ball. Legend.
Didn't Hurry say he thought their score was 30 above par? Implies if we get a decent lead they could struggle batting third.
Fingers crossed these two bat for another hour...
BVI Grockle
Didn't Hurry say he thought their score was 30 above par? Implies if we get a decent lead they could struggle batting third.
Fingers crossed these two bat for another hour...
BVI Grockle
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:47
Surely blub a guy who has averaged 50+ for the past 30/40 first class games should be batting in the top 6 at a minimum?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:48
As we speak he is out but that partnership could be the defining one of the game
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:51
Did stuart law not fancy it today or was he injured?
He came in at number 7 behind glenn chapple
He came in at number 7 behind glenn chapple
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:51
Well, wherever he bats, he has yet again put in a first class performance, now sadly over.
I must remember to ask my chum BJ if he'd like a discussion about the failure of those who score fifty to go on to three figures, as obviously nobody else would be interested.
Now I suggest IDB ensures we get that fourth batting point and then has a real blitz - but he doesn't need any advice from me.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:21:16:53:48 by Loyal of Lhasa..
I must remember to ask my chum BJ if he'd like a discussion about the failure of those who score fifty to go on to three figures, as obviously nobody else would be interested.
Now I suggest IDB ensures we get that fourth batting point and then has a real blitz - but he doesn't need any advice from me.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:21:16:53:48 by Loyal of Lhasa..
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:55
Pete said in the paper last week that he was dissapointed that he has not got to 3 figures this year,but i suppose we will take our number 8 getting 50+ each game!!
Hope Blackie gets the hundred he deserves.
Hope Blackie gets the hundred he deserves.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Blub (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:59
I always struggle with the notion of "deserving" to bat higher.
It doesn't make sense to me.
In this case, someone averaging over 50, and scoring at a run a ball would seem ideal to come in late in the order. Unless those ahead of him are struggling for form*, and I am not sure that is the case.
* = distinct from being in "less" form.
It doesn't make sense to me.
In this case, someone averaging over 50, and scoring at a run a ball would seem ideal to come in late in the order. Unless those ahead of him are struggling for form*, and I am not sure that is the case.
* = distinct from being in "less" form.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: BVI Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 16:59
LOL's request for the 4th point - tick.
Fingers and toes crossed for another hour of Blackie.
Hopefully the rain hasn't put paid to any chance of us winning the game, but you never know.
Perhaps Pete might get a few more overs in the 2nd innings to cash in on his obscene strike rate this season.
BVI Grockle
Fingers and toes crossed for another hour of Blackie.
Hopefully the rain hasn't put paid to any chance of us winning the game, but you never know.
Perhaps Pete might get a few more overs in the 2nd innings to cash in on his obscene strike rate this season.
BVI Grockle
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:08
I just think that pete is simply a better player than a couple of the guys in the top 6 at the moment and has proven that over the past 2 seasons.
I appreciate that a lot of his runs have been at 7/8 but surely its time to put faith in both of his abilities.
Averages dont lie,and people during and at the end of their carrer will always look at that and define weather that player was a nearly man or a good county pro.
I appreciate that a lot of his runs have been at 7/8 but surely its time to put faith in both of his abilities.
Averages dont lie,and people during and at the end of their carrer will always look at that and define weather that player was a nearly man or a good county pro.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:09
What a brilliant performance,well done lads.
Great knock by Blackie,I daren't be too gushing in my praise,and another pointer for the England selectors in the shape of Trigger.
How much does the lad have to do before they recognise his talent?
Full steam ahead now and let's try and force a result.
They'll be there for the taking second time up I reckon.
Great knock by Blackie,I daren't be too gushing in my praise,and another pointer for the England selectors in the shape of Trigger.
How much does the lad have to do before they recognise his talent?
Full steam ahead now and let's try and force a result.
They'll be there for the taking second time up I reckon.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:17
Spot on, BJ. You are absolutely right, but you can assume the selectors will continue to be wrong.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:26
Well done Mighty Man. And don't ever dream of playing for another county.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:26
Well played Blackie
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:28
To be honest Jim i dont think the selectors know that the M5 continues down to Taunton!!!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:33
Not a bad finish - 15 runs away from full bonus points.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:37
CONGRATULATIONS TO BLACKIE
And also to PT.
Absolutely tremendous performance in what must have been a very pressured situation.
Really chuffed for both of them & hope that certain of the 'powers that be' have been watching. They both had points to prove re the lunacy that has been our recent one day selection policy, and have done so in the best possible manner.
Hopefully JL will be the first to congratulate them !
Grizzzly
And also to PT.
Absolutely tremendous performance in what must have been a very pressured situation.
Really chuffed for both of them & hope that certain of the 'powers that be' have been watching. They both had points to prove re the lunacy that has been our recent one day selection policy, and have done so in the best possible manner.
Hopefully JL will be the first to congratulate them !
Grizzzly
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Blub (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:39
I don't disagree with you bo with regards to Pete's batting. My point is - or rather its more of a question to anyone cleverer than me is - why would this mean that he should bat higher than 8?
Granted, if he was behind someone like Thomas, or Caddy, I could understand it, but does it really matter if he bats behind Wes and Craig? Both are good batters - on their day - and the fact that Pete is more consistent, or at least, in better form makes little difference. To me - at least, he is no less valuable for it, more so imho.
Anyway, it could be viewed as an interesting comparison with the Hampshire skipper who seems to be a place (at least) ahead of Pete in the England pecking order.
Very well done Blackie.
Do they declare overnight or go in for a swish for an hour tomorrow?
Granted, if he was behind someone like Thomas, or Caddy, I could understand it, but does it really matter if he bats behind Wes and Craig? Both are good batters - on their day - and the fact that Pete is more consistent, or at least, in better form makes little difference. To me - at least, he is no less valuable for it, more so imho.
Anyway, it could be viewed as an interesting comparison with the Hampshire skipper who seems to be a place (at least) ahead of Pete in the England pecking order.
Very well done Blackie.
Do they declare overnight or go in for a swish for an hour tomorrow?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:39
Good to see that we didn`t throw away wickets by having a wild dash for 400 before the end of play today.
Surely the tactic now is not just to reach 400 tomorrow, but race past it for, say, 14 overs. By that time we should be around 140 ahead, with 80 overs still left to bowl in the day.
If we can then rush them out in 60-65 overs, the match could be there for the taking.
Surely the tactic now is not just to reach 400 tomorrow, but race past it for, say, 14 overs. By that time we should be around 140 ahead, with 80 overs still left to bowl in the day.
If we can then rush them out in 60-65 overs, the match could be there for the taking.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:49
What a great team performance - makes one very proud. Can anyone say what the score at lunch and tea was? I have the impression we scored increasingly quickly from one session to the next.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:49
What a hero,what a man.
Ian Blackwell,a legend.
Well done Blackie,great to see.
Can this man be left out when in this form?
Perhaps a bit of psychology has done the trick.
Who knows?
Fantastic performance today boys,well done.
Finish them off tomorrow and keep that foot on the gas for the rest of the season.
Impressive.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:21:17:51:22 by Big Jim.
Ian Blackwell,a legend.
Well done Blackie,great to see.
Can this man be left out when in this form?
Perhaps a bit of psychology has done the trick.
Who knows?
Fantastic performance today boys,well done.
Finish them off tomorrow and keep that foot on the gas for the rest of the season.
Impressive.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:21:17:51:22 by Big Jim.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: BVI Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 17:54
I think it will take a combination of a brisk start tomorrow morning, some cooperative weather and a batting collapse from Hampshire to contrive the win. At least the worst case scenario here is a draw with maximum bonus points. Still puts Durham in the strongest position, but given the weather's behaviour not a bad return.
Congrats to Hilders, PT and above all Blackie for scoring heavily in what sounds like less than optimal conditions.
BVI Grockle
Congrats to Hilders, PT and above all Blackie for scoring heavily in what sounds like less than optimal conditions.
BVI Grockle
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 18:16
Yeah; great effort all round, lads, but obviously particularly well done to Blackie for really cashing in.
In answer to LoL's question, wasn't Hildreth out immediately after lunch, which would mean the lunch score was around 150. And wasn't tea taken at the fall of Kieswetter's wicket, on 251?
In answer to LoL's question, wasn't Hildreth out immediately after lunch, which would mean the lunch score was around 150. And wasn't tea taken at the fall of Kieswetter's wicket, on 251?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 18:23
Quote:Loyal of Lhasa.
Can anyone say what the score at lunch and tea was?
I checked the Guardian blog and it looks like it was pretty much as follows:
start: 41-0
lunch: 144-3
tea: 251-6
close: 385-7
so:
session 1 - 3 wickets, 103 runs
session 2 - 3 wickets, 107 runs
session 3 - 1 wicket, 134 runs
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 18:57
This is a good report.
- Somerset enjoyed a good six hours and effectively shut Hampshire out of the match, going into the final day. Ian Blackwell hit a responsible rather than devastating century, and was backed by his team-mates all the way down the order. It remains to be seen whether the bowlers can do their bit to win the match on the final day - and if the weather will let them
Full report :- [content-uk.cricinfo.com]
- Somerset enjoyed a good six hours and effectively shut Hampshire out of the match, going into the final day. Ian Blackwell hit a responsible rather than devastating century, and was backed by his team-mates all the way down the order. It remains to be seen whether the bowlers can do their bit to win the match on the final day - and if the weather will let them
Full report :- [content-uk.cricinfo.com]
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 21:37
If we get a full day tomorrow then there's a possiblity of more than just bonus points and it's great to see Ian get a hundred.
Now he needs to be given the opportunity to continue this against Glos so this becomes his 'form' - one hundred don't a championship run make.
Hildreth seems to be coming out of his slump as well if the report in the forum today is to be believed.
Keep this going Mr Langer, Mr Rose. Let's get as much out of this game as possible and then move on to the next with a winning team!
Now he needs to be given the opportunity to continue this against Glos so this becomes his 'form' - one hundred don't a championship run make.
Hildreth seems to be coming out of his slump as well if the report in the forum today is to be believed.
Keep this going Mr Langer, Mr Rose. Let's get as much out of this game as possible and then move on to the next with a winning team!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 22:54
A splendid day thanks to Blackie and Pete. The best thing was Blackie's strike rate which indicated the innings of a batsman in difficult circumstances. I;ve just read what I wrote and Ia m not meaning to criticise Pete as a non batsman because of his strike rate, merely pointing to a different Blackie. I see Hurry is quoted as looking for a lead of 150 so he's asking for another 90 and then bowl like demons. Victory is unlikely but a good 12 points coming
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 22:56
Look, Ian and Pete did what any one that posseses a brain expected them to do. I, personally, was absolutely delighted with what they did. They took four wickets. They were very parismonious and they made more than 150 runs.
I make no apologies whatsoever for calling out Justin Langer and Brian Rose and saying to them - BEHOLLD - without these two we would, almost certainly, have no chance of winning this game.
No one deserves to win the CC title more than A R Caddick - no one on the whole circuit, but I personally cannot wait to see Ian life the trophy above his head and for the powers that be to recant in front of us all. And recant they must.
I make no apologies whatsoever for calling out Justin Langer and Brian Rose and saying to them - BEHOLLD - without these two we would, almost certainly, have no chance of winning this game.
No one deserves to win the CC title more than A R Caddick - no one on the whole circuit, but I personally cannot wait to see Ian life the trophy above his head and for the powers that be to recant in front of us all. And recant they must.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 23:33
I hope more than anything we win the CC.
I then hope we lift the trophy as one,as a team.A squad.
No splits,no bad feeling and no one individual feeling any more or any less worthy than anybody else.
The effort they've all put in over the last few seasons has been heart warming.
Let's hope they can make the final push and bring home the title we've all been waiting for.
I then hope we lift the trophy as one,as a team.A squad.
No splits,no bad feeling and no one individual feeling any more or any less worthy than anybody else.
The effort they've all put in over the last few seasons has been heart warming.
Let's hope they can make the final push and bring home the title we've all been waiting for.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2008 23:40
We're in a decent position, Jim. And Durham have just been undermined by Harmy's ODI return. Suspect they'll win their remaining home games (but find them low scoring) but Durham do struggle, at times, away from home.
Notts?
If we beat them at Trent Bridge, I believe they will be floating on the water...
More than anything, I'm looking forward to North Marine Road. Great ground. Great pitch. More often that not, folk with whom we can get along very well..
Notts?
If we beat them at Trent Bridge, I believe they will be floating on the water...
More than anything, I'm looking forward to North Marine Road. Great ground. Great pitch. More often that not, folk with whom we can get along very well..
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 06:20
Personally i think this is going to be the most important day of the season.
A lead of 69 hopefully will be increased to 125/150 and then let our bowlers put maximum pressure on the hampshire top order.
As we have seen over the years its not a great position to be in as a batting side when the only result you can get is a draw and that is surely the position hampshire are in.
I have heard that the wicket is taking turn and also the "odd" ball is going up or down......... enter Mr Caddidck.
I can see a small run chase late on in the day!!!
Or do we pull out at 400 and get them in asap?
A lead of 69 hopefully will be increased to 125/150 and then let our bowlers put maximum pressure on the hampshire top order.
As we have seen over the years its not a great position to be in as a batting side when the only result you can get is a draw and that is surely the position hampshire are in.
I have heard that the wicket is taking turn and also the "odd" ball is going up or down......... enter Mr Caddidck.
I can see a small run chase late on in the day!!!
Or do we pull out at 400 and get them in asap?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 07:37
I would have thought that we'd have to back ourselves to bowl them out in two sessions plus a short dart before lunch, wouldn't we?
So my instinct would be to get what we can out of these last three wickets. 100-120 more in an hour and a half?
So my instinct would be to get what we can out of these last three wickets. 100-120 more in an hour and a half?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Sloop John B (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 07:49
Once we hit the 400 it will be Wham, Bam thank you Mam!!
Blackie will have licence to cut loose and for 10 or so overs the leather will fly!
Lead of 140-150 will be pressure for an inexperienced Hants side.
Blackie will have licence to cut loose and for 10 or so overs the leather will fly!
Lead of 140-150 will be pressure for an inexperienced Hants side.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 08:04
It will be interesting if when we get close to winning the championship if the radio will suddenly become interested in doing a commentary.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 08:36
"Lead of 140-150 will be pressure for an inexperienced Hants side."
Inexperienced AND under-pressure (relegation.)
Not sure there's much in the pitch for the pacemen, though, so I think that, to win the game, we may very well need career-best bowling from IDB.
Inexperienced AND under-pressure (relegation.)
Not sure there's much in the pitch for the pacemen, though, so I think that, to win the game, we may very well need career-best bowling from IDB.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 08:37
Just read back and read Mr Trego's post about a bit of 'up and down stuff.'
That's certainly encouraging..
That's certainly encouraging..
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 08:48
Times describes it as a slow turner which is what I had guessed was the case from actual match events.
Of course, a draw has to be favoured - especially as there may be showers around, too.
But Mr Trego made a very good point that it can be tough batting when you have no chance of winning which is the situation that should face Hants at some time today.
Of course, a draw has to be favoured - especially as there may be showers around, too.
But Mr Trego made a very good point that it can be tough batting when you have no chance of winning which is the situation that should face Hants at some time today.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 09:09
Certainly was. 'An idea for everything,' was the phrase that caught my eye in this morning's paper.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:03
Being that Hants are desperate for points, and have no chance of winning this game, surely their only option is to shut up shop completely and just aim to survive? If we win this game, we deserve the CC, but I'm not sure we can take 10 wickets today.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:09
The main thing against our prospects is that wickets have not fallen quickly, nor in bunches, in this contest so far.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:19
Maximum bonus points.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:20
But in all honesty their opening attack in this match, Tomlinson and Mascarhenas, are no better than our change bowlers in this match, Thomas and Trego.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:21
Doesn't it make you proud... What a team this is!
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:22
Yes, though we need rather less rain so that we can glean rather more wins!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:23
Now let's get 'em in and work at getting 'em out. Let Blackie loose and if he goes? Send the bowlers in!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:27
Quote:Mike BOS
Maximum bonus points.
That puts us five points clear of Notts at the top on the same number of games, with any points for the draw or the victory yet to be added.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:38
Alfonso really has been a tasty pick-up, has he not?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:40
I don't think we should underestimate what a good effort this is from Alfonso, too.
He's just gone past his CC best for us, and what a time to do it!
Now show us what your really capable of with the bat, Alfie!
He's just gone past his CC best for us, and what a time to do it!
Now show us what your really capable of with the bat, Alfie!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:40
Young Blackwell wasn't either, not that I'm very keen on your choice of noun or adjective. AG.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:44
&rse! Now Alfie might as well up it.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:44
My apologies, Professor. I think my normal standards are slipping as I'm de-mob happy with Bank Holiday coming up, SCCC on the box tomorrow. A trip to Taunton for Thursday night's game, a week in Avignon and, hopefully a trip to Scarborough, all lying in my immediate future.
My only regret is that SCCC cannot play Notts in Avignon where, I'm sure, the weather will be a good deal more reliable.
My only regret is that SCCC cannot play Notts in Avignon where, I'm sure, the weather will be a good deal more reliable.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:46
Also good to see warm praise from Andy Hurry for Ian on the 'other,' SCCC site.
A few words of praise from Mr Rose will, hopefully, be forthcoming after the game, too.
A few words of praise from Mr Rose will, hopefully, be forthcoming after the game, too.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:48
With a potentially low-scoring game at Notts coming up, Alfonso's display of form may be especially timely.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:52
I'm not sure we should bother with Charl. Potential down-side (hand injury being sustained) may outweigh any potential up-side.
What say you, Gents, should we proceed with the bowling out of Hants now?
What say you, Gents, should we proceed with the bowling out of Hants now?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:55
There are Ladies present
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:56
436 all out.
Now let's get at them.
Now let's get at them.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:57
Willo didn't hang around long enough to pick up any injuries at all!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 10:59
Come on, Caddy, let's rip them out.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 11:16
any bets on how soon the ball will be thrown to IDB?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 11:20
15th over (or last over before lunch, whichever is sooner).
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 11:20
I say over number 11 (unless lunch comes sooner - as with your caveat.)
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 11:40
Don't worry folks. I have to pop out in the car later for 20 minutes or so. As long as I don't go during lunch, that should be good for a couple of wickets!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 11:56
BOBO I think I love you. Now for the remaining 9,
Has FE gone out? Can we thank him too?
Has FE gone out? Can we thank him too?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 11:57
Has the inimitable Trego saved you the journey?
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 11:57
That's a start Trego got a wicket.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 12:04
I'm going out too - and FE and I make a pretty formidable bowling partnership.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 12:09
No; the journey was held in abeyance until after lunch.
Bo, your brother is rapidly becoming a living legend!
Bo, your brother is rapidly becoming a living legend!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 12:35
Trigger is already a legend.
If he's not recognised by the selectors soon with a call up to the national side then I think we need an answer from the men in charge as to why not.
He is the best allrounder in the country and has been for a few seasons.
Stop ignoring him.
As much as I'd hate to see him play less for us the lad deserves his chance.
Go get 'em Trig.
If he's not recognised by the selectors soon with a call up to the national side then I think we need an answer from the men in charge as to why not.
He is the best allrounder in the country and has been for a few seasons.
Stop ignoring him.
As much as I'd hate to see him play less for us the lad deserves his chance.
Go get 'em Trig.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 12:42
Brian Rose says that Pete needs to take more wickets.
I would like to suggest to Mr Rose that we bowl Pete more and more often and he may very well find that Pete WILL then take more wickets.
I would like to suggest to Mr Rose that we bowl Pete more and more often and he may very well find that Pete WILL then take more wickets.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 12:43
Yeah i suppose i have to agree he is a living legend!!!!
But i wont tell him that on the weekend!!
But i wont tell him that on the weekend!!
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 12:48
Quite right, bo.
I'm very proud of my little brother.......but I don't like to tell him so too often.
I'm very proud of my little brother.......but I don't like to tell him so too often.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 12:56
Right. Twenty minutes; two wickets, please.
TTFN.
TTFN.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 13:01
Blackie on for the 19th over...
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 13:01
and the great IDB finally enters the attack... to bowl the 19th over.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 13:20
Plenty of time to wrap this up.
Keep at it boys,one wicket goes down and they'll start to panic.
Keep at it boys,one wicket goes down and they'll start to panic.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 13:24
well, I guess we take our 12 points and move on to the show-down at Trent Bridge....
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:07
Interesting that Arul seems to have already fallen behind Wes in the bowling pecking order, based on Wes being brought on first in this innings.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:10
I wouldn't read too much into things like that AG,it may have been for any number of reasons.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:19
The most obvious being that his off breaks offer greater contrast with Ian's slow left arm.
And Arul then took over from Ian anyway. There's an element of try anything at this stage.
And Arul then took over from Ian anyway. There's an element of try anything at this stage.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:23
I do not like thee, Mr Lumb,
The reason why I cannot plumb;
This only can I fathom
I do not like thee, Mr Lumb.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
The reason why I cannot plumb;
This only can I fathom
I do not like thee, Mr Lumb.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: tufnell parka (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:31
call it a draw
the weather wins and some stubborn hampshire batting
i'll take the bonus points and put the pressure back on durham and notts
the weather wins and some stubborn hampshire batting
i'll take the bonus points and put the pressure back on durham and notts
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:33
Mr Lumb
Mr Lumb
You make me glum
Young Mr Lumb
Mr Lumb
You make me glum
Young Mr Lumb
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:34
And yet,
it's dumb to let,
young Mr Lumb,
make me glum,
when hereupon,
I can suck on my thumb,
all thanks to Mr Lumb.
it's dumb to let,
young Mr Lumb,
make me glum,
when hereupon,
I can suck on my thumb,
all thanks to Mr Lumb.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:42
The contrast thing depends on how you look at it, FE. When I've seen Wes, he's generally flighted the ball, as does Ian. Arul tends to bowl darts, though. Therefore, unless the ball is turning a lot, then Wes might be more 'samey,' than Arul?
Regardless, it now seems that they're both being given a chance of a long bowl now - presumably as an audition for which of them will retain his place when JL returns?
Regardless, it now seems that they're both being given a chance of a long bowl now - presumably as an audition for which of them will retain his place when JL returns?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:44
"Dear Mr Lumb"
goes the noted refrain,
"that in the bum
you are a pain".
goes the noted refrain,
"that in the bum
you are a pain".
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:45
Oddly, I see no poems about Michael Carberry.....
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:48
Quote:AGod
presumably as an audition for which of them will retain his place when JL returns?
Or quite possibly because there's nothing left in this game for which it is worth risking injury to any of the strike bowlers.
I'm sure there'll be a perfunctory few overs from the pacemen after tea, but this does have a look of going through the motions.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:22:14:50:30 by Frome Exile.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:54
Michael Carberry
Will go far very
Back to the pavilion soon
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Will go far very
Back to the pavilion soon
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 14:55
I'd be interested in any furhter thoughts that you may have in the Harmision to return thread, FE.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 15:02
I'm not with you?
Are you drawing a parallel between risking key players during the death throes of a drawn game and risking a key test player in ODIs?
Are you drawing a parallel between risking key players during the death throes of a drawn game and risking a key test player in ODIs?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 15:04
no, no, not conncecting the two at all, just wondered if you had any further thoughts for that thread.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 15:06
Right. I don't think so. We've debunked Vaughan, and as to whether we will lose at home what we gain on tour (with Harmison)? - you may be right; we'll just have to wait and see.
I think the fact that Wes and Arul have continued after tea is the final indication that we've given this game up, and suggests that it would be pretty unfair to consider bowling under such circumstances as any kind of meaningful audition.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:22:15:10:37 by Frome Exile.
I think the fact that Wes and Arul have continued after tea is the final indication that we've given this game up, and suggests that it would be pretty unfair to consider bowling under such circumstances as any kind of meaningful audition.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:22:15:10:37 by Frome Exile.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 15:07
Young Michael Carberry,
the Hampshire gem,
he came from Surrey,
but I don't know when.
They call him Carbs,
though he's not too stout,
and if he'd mis-timed it,
we'd have got him out.
Michael Carberry,
you're Hamsphire's key player,
Now that the fat one,
has gone to play poker.
the Hampshire gem,
he came from Surrey,
but I don't know when.
They call him Carbs,
though he's not too stout,
and if he'd mis-timed it,
we'd have got him out.
Michael Carberry,
you're Hamsphire's key player,
Now that the fat one,
has gone to play poker.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 15:09
Standing ovation for that one, Jim.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 15:09
EJT strikes again
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 15:16
Can't think why Hants don't declare and make a match of it.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 15:54
Twelve points safely in the bag.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 16:01
Indeed. Shake hands, bag the twelve, on to Trent Bridge.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 16:05
And both the other games, with a day to go, looking favourable to us.
By the time we face Notts, they will once again have played one more than us. Do we favour rains of biblical proportions at Hove next week?
By the time we face Notts, they will once again have played one more than us. Do we favour rains of biblical proportions at Hove next week?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 16:12
Another glance at the table show that, if Kent duly complete victory iover Lancs, we will be top, not by virtue of most wins, but more by virtue of being the only team in the division to have suffered only one defeat.
Does this bear out the oft-quoted adage that the most significant requirement in winning the Championship is to avoid defeat?
Does this bear out the oft-quoted adage that the most significant requirement in winning the Championship is to avoid defeat?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 16:14
Somerset played 12 – 146 points
Notts …..played 12 – 137 points
Durham…played 11 – 136 points
Durham with a game in-hand and 10 points behind Somerset.
__
Notts …..played 12 – 137 points
Durham…played 11 – 136 points
Durham with a game in-hand and 10 points behind Somerset.
__
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 16:16
I think avoiding defeat saves you from getting relegated, but probably won't be enough to win you the championship (unless weather plays in big part in stopping others getting points while you are lucky and keep getting 12 per match).
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 16:30
Yeah; obviously Durham's five wins to our three leaves them in the box seat at the moment. But I think I'm right in saying that there have been quite a few cases in recent years of the Championship being won by a team other than the one with most wins?
Anyway, let's see what Durham's and Notts' games next week bring and then get ready to stuff them both.
I notice Hants are hosting Durham at an out-ground (Basingstoke) next week which might suggest a less than perfect pitch? Or one that might not cope well with inclement weather? What price a low-scoring shoot-out?
Anyway, let's see what Durham's and Notts' games next week bring and then get ready to stuff them both.
I notice Hants are hosting Durham at an out-ground (Basingstoke) next week which might suggest a less than perfect pitch? Or one that might not cope well with inclement weather? What price a low-scoring shoot-out?
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 16:33
Hasn't Basingstoke historically been flat and high-scoring - that's my recollection, tho I may be wrong.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 16:37
... and my recollection too.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 16:37
You're probably right, SP. My remarks were based on nothing more than "out-ground predjudice", rather than any recollection.
Re: Hunting Hampshire again
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 22/08/2008 18:45
This is the headline from the BBC site.
Somerset miss the chance to move top of Division One as Hampshire's Michael Carberry and Michael Lumb put on an unbroken stand of 170 to earn a draw.
This is from the ECB site.
Somerset wasted the opportunity to go top of the LV County Championship after Hampshire batted through most of the last day to ensure a draw.
This is from the SKY site
Somerset moved top of the Division One table after taking 12 points from their drawn fixture against Hampshire at the Rose Bowl.
I prefer the SKY version it is correct.
Somerset miss the chance to move top of Division One as Hampshire's Michael Carberry and Michael Lumb put on an unbroken stand of 170 to earn a draw.
This is from the ECB site.
Somerset wasted the opportunity to go top of the LV County Championship after Hampshire batted through most of the last day to ensure a draw.
This is from the SKY site
Somerset moved top of the Division One table after taking 12 points from their drawn fixture against Hampshire at the Rose Bowl.
I prefer the SKY version it is correct.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
