Triple Spin Attack
The Spin Twins
Triple Spin Attack
By Grockle
August 27 2009
The Championship plan is unvieled. The spin attack is going to spin us back into contention on turning wickets at home and at the Rose Bowl. Pardon me if i don't sound entirely convinced by this but it seems to be the present thinking. t didn't work at Home against Sussex. It has t work against Hampshire or Durham will be too far ahead t be caught.
Triple Spin Attack
August 27 2009
The Championship plan is unvieled. The spin attack is going to spin us back into contention on turning wickets at home and at the Rose Bowl. Pardon me if i don't sound entirely convinced by this but it seems to be the present thinking. t didn't work at Home against Sussex. It has t work against Hampshire or Durham will be too far ahead t be caught.
v Sussex LVCC1 @ Taunton Wednesday 19 August 2009
A plan was hatched in the strategy rooms of the County Ground. The master plan to beat Sussex and keep us in the hunt.
"Dry the pitch. Cut all the grass off it. Win the toss. Bat BIG and spin them out in 7 sessions twice".
The team picked reflected this plan;
Trescothick, Suppiah, Hildreth, Langer, de Bruyn, Trego, Kieswetter, Banks, Waller, Phillips, Willoughby
Triple spin and tight pace would do the trick.
Unfortunately, the plan fell at the third hurdle. The pitch was prepared and.....we lost the toss. Game over. 742 before we got to bat on Day 2. Most of Day 3 (all but 18 overs lost to rain and a wet outfield and Day 4 mind-numbing except for a flurry between the 100th and the 120th overs by Craig and Peter to get maximum batting points by passing 400. All over by 4:50 and 10 points each for the most boring game of the year.
Bad decision made worse by the principles on our side blaming the pitch they had asked to be prepared. Do we really have the spin capability to do major damage to a batting side in Division 1?
V Hampshire LVCC1 @ The Rose Bowl Thursday 27 August 2009
Well we'd better hope so because this vital fixture has started with the same side taking the field for Somerset to get maximum points from this game and move us into contender position against the run away leaders of the Division at Chester-le-Street on Tuesday next.
The only change to the Sussex line-up is the return of Alfonso Thomas for Ben Phillips but we seem to be either relying on the spin option in the second half of this game or extensive work from Pete Trego and Zander de Bruyn. Either way we need a big win or the Pro40 will be our only chance of silverware this year.
Hampshire have won the toss and chosen to bat.
Bookmark or share this story with:
Digg
Delicious
Facebook
Reddit
StumbleuponRelated Articles:
The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grockles.com (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 11:27
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:08:31:15:49:39 by Grockle.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:08:31:15:49:39 by Grockle.
Hampshire - Rose Bowl Run-down
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 09:05
Andy Hurry and Alfonso Thomas are making all the right noises ahead of today's game.
Squad is unchanged and we expect a result wicket.
Squad is unchanged and we expect a result wicket.
Re: Hampshire - Rose Bowl Run-down
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 09:48
Same team as against Sussex. The spin triplets play.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:08:27:09:50:33 by Frome Exile.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:08:27:09:50:33 by Frome Exile.
Re: Hampshire - Rose Bowl Run-down
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 10:00
Hampshire won toss and will bat.
I do hope the correct team is selected this time.
I do hope the correct team is selected this time.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 11:31
Careful Grockle: you're not sounding sufficiently like a corporate lackey in your assessment of the Sussex game. 
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 11:38
looks like a repeat performance so far
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 14:14
think thats us about 920 for 6 in the last 2 games when we have been bowling. If this doesn't say something to the management then I don't iknow what will.
Wickets please.
Wickets please.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 14:20
Notts only managed one batting point, four bonus points in total.
We need to get maximum bonus points to over take them!
We need to get maximum bonus points to over take them!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 14:39
Start praying for a collapse then
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 14:50
Where is our bowling fire power ?
Don't understand our 'strategy' over the last few CC games.
Maybe I'm just being dim.
Grizzzly
Don't understand our 'strategy' over the last few CC games.
Maybe I'm just being dim.
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 15:21
The Rosebowl usually favours the seamers, so maybe ours are having an off day.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 16:19
I haven't seen one of those for a while.
Ervine, out hit wicket.
Ervine, out hit wicket.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 16:22
Not an off day Both but a day off!
Banksie is ripping through them now.Seems the plan is working.
Banksie is ripping through them now.Seems the plan is working.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 16:40
I fear that we may be too late, as the weather forecast isn't brilliant. I bet we'd love to be in their position.
I repeat, if we're to stand any chance of winning the CC, we need a top strike bowler.
I repeat, if we're to stand any chance of winning the CC, we need a top strike bowler.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 17:20
Not on your own with that one. Be it a pace or spin king we need someone to spearhead the wicket taking and take five fers
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Streeter (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 17:55
Anyone have any idea of the bowling combinations used today ? Pete has bowled 11 overs for 14. Doesn't that look like a good partner for a spinner at the other end ? Does seem strange to have only bowled him for the 11.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 18:51
So with a quick-fire 50 in the last game, and a first-day three-fer in this one, it's looking like Banks is finally (and perhaps too late) showing the form that Congar and I had such high hopes for when he signed.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 19:34
On the other site, Andy Hurry says this is a used wicket, so would be expected to turn more as the game progresses. Must hope we can get rid of them tomorrow and get a healthy first innings lead.
On another thread, dropped catches are mentioned - do we have any evidence of that? If so, do we know anything else: did the seamers bowl well with no luck, did it turn much, was Banks the most deserving bowler, etc?
One of my pet hates is when the other site tells us the story of the day only by retelling what we can see from the scorecard. For example, no mention of how / why Sean Ervine hit his wicket...?
On another thread, dropped catches are mentioned - do we have any evidence of that? If so, do we know anything else: did the seamers bowl well with no luck, did it turn much, was Banks the most deserving bowler, etc?
One of my pet hates is when the other site tells us the story of the day only by retelling what we can see from the scorecard. For example, no mention of how / why Sean Ervine hit his wicket...?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 19:47
SP this may help you, a newspaper report. [www.thisisbristol.co.uk]
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 19:54
Most enlightening, thanks Mike.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 27/08/2009 20:15
Skittle them out for bits and pieces tomorrow and we're in business.
Well done Pete and Omari.
They're there for the taking.
Trego for England
Well done Pete and Omari.
They're there for the taking.
Trego for England
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 09:16
I wonder if anyone knows any more about this incident?
The 'Daily Telegraph's' report of yesterday's play states:-
"Somerset's first breakthrough of the day provided the crowd with a hint of drama, though seeing Justin Langer crumple to the ground after Adams top-edged the ball firmly into his face left a more vivid impresssion."
Sounds nasty, but let's hope not.
The 'Daily Telegraph's' report of yesterday's play states:-
"Somerset's first breakthrough of the day provided the crowd with a hint of drama, though seeing Justin Langer crumple to the ground after Adams top-edged the ball firmly into his face left a more vivid impresssion."
Sounds nasty, but let's hope not.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 09:36
Quote:From the Bristol Evening Post report (courtesy of Nathan's link)
After a wicketless first session, Banks saw Adams dropped by Langer at slip off his bowling when he was 47. Adams powerfully cut a short ball that struck the tough Australian in the head via his hand. Langer did not require treatment.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 09:38
I was also struck by a particualr phrase in the earlier part of the report.
Quote:Omari Banks pushed his claims for a new contract as he took three wickets on the first day of Somerset's County Championship match with Hampshire at the Rose Bowl......
.....Somerset have not yet decided whether to offer the former West Indies off-spinner a new deal when his contract expires at the end of next month.
Banks arrived at Taunton in April on a British passport with a big reputation after his ten Tests and five one-day internationals.
There was even talk of the Anguillan qualifying to play for England but he has struggled to hold down a place in Somerset's side.
An unrelenting work ethic has endeared Banks to captain Justin Langer and day one against Hampshire was his best day so far.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 09:46
Glad to assume that he wasn't 'bored'.
3 for 79 = "best day so far" after almost two years?
No wonder there was talk about him "qualifying to play for England."
3 for 79 = "best day so far" after almost two years?
No wonder there was talk about him "qualifying to play for England."
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 09:51
"One day does not make a contract".
I have got that saying wrong?
I have got that saying wrong?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 09:57
Just to clarify: I'm not saying that he should be rewarded with a new contract on the basis of this one day: more pointing out that this is what those of us who supported his initial recruitment expected to be the norm!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 10:08
Just to clarify: FE.
my comment was nothing to do with your post, I thought the same thing yesterday when I read the newspaper report.
I don't believe he has done enough to justify a new contract. Will he win a match for us?
my comment was nothing to do with your post, I thought the same thing yesterday when I read the newspaper report.
I don't believe he has done enough to justify a new contract. Will he win a match for us?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 10:13
Well three wickets on day one suggest that the next three days might provide his best chance to do so.
I suspect though that AG, for one, might suggest that a performance in the "last-chance saloon" should be given no greater credence than the big performances he has given in trials games and in securing this contract. I think he has already decided that Banks only steps it up at such times, and there does appear to be a pattern which gives that perception some credibility.
I suspect though that AG, for one, might suggest that a performance in the "last-chance saloon" should be given no greater credence than the big performances he has given in trials games and in securing this contract. I think he has already decided that Banks only steps it up at such times, and there does appear to be a pattern which gives that perception some credibility.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 11:12
There's the breakthrough.............into 'em now!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 11:29
Get in Willo! Big man gone now.
Foot on throat time boys!
Foot on throat time boys!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 11:39
Willow must be knackered - in his 33rd over.
Wonder why Max has bowled only 6 ???
Grizzzly
Wonder why Max has bowled only 6 ???
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 12:18
Questions from an ignorant ex-pat:
1) As we are playing three spinners to take advantage of a spin friendly wicket, why have seamers bowled 70% of our overs to date ?
(I realise the 2nd innings - if there is one -, may be different, but this does seem modest usage of players picked specifically for the conditions).
2) Can anyone recall any (post Mushtaq) Championship game which we have won by the efforts of a spin based bowling 'attack' ?
Grizzzly
1) As we are playing three spinners to take advantage of a spin friendly wicket, why have seamers bowled 70% of our overs to date ?
(I realise the 2nd innings - if there is one -, may be different, but this does seem modest usage of players picked specifically for the conditions).
2) Can anyone recall any (post Mushtaq) Championship game which we have won by the efforts of a spin based bowling 'attack' ?
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 13:58
So it would appear that we've succeeded in denying Hants a batting point; but perhaps in little else.
Dominic Cork is a cussed opponent isn't he!
Dominic Cork is a cussed opponent isn't he!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 14:38
Superb bowling from Omari.
Well done lad,you've worked hard for this.
Trego for England
Well done lad,you've worked hard for this.
Trego for England
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 15:06
Apathy has set in and by the look of it and the response on these boards everyone else is too. I am worried about the number of times we struggle to finsih teams off. Today looks quite embarrassing- I hope the team are and we can put it right with the bat when the question of whether it is a flat wicket will really be answered.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Kentish Townie (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 15:09
Not one to say a glass half full or anything but Max's figures in this game and the last are of concern.
We have two home grown leg spinners yet the spinner who is getting the overs, the wickets and possibly a new contract is Banks.
Where is Munday..!!
We have two home grown leg spinners yet the spinner who is getting the overs, the wickets and possibly a new contract is Banks.
Where is Munday..!!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 15:30
On the adjacent ground playing for the Seconds.
Or is the provision of a simple factual answer a little too obtuse?
Or is the provision of a simple factual answer a little too obtuse?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 15:30
Sadly KT I don't know but I am actually not sure whether just at this satge any of them are good enough. THe best at the moment appears to be Suppiah.
However, to get better and more experienced you have to bowl so its catch 22. Do we have the time to let them learn in Div 1.....I don't think we do to be honest. How many would accept relegation if it meant a couple of quality bowlers in 2/3 yaers time. Even then there are no guarantees. Its a tough call.
However, to get better and more experienced you have to bowl so its catch 22. Do we have the time to let them learn in Div 1.....I don't think we do to be honest. How many would accept relegation if it meant a couple of quality bowlers in 2/3 yaers time. Even then there are no guarantees. Its a tough call.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 17:00
It's not a tough call for me! Top four in Div One every time suits me - wouldn't want to go back to second-class cricket, even if it did give Munday, Waller et al a few more cheap wickets.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 17:06
Not Waller I’m afraid, Shep.
He only made his first-class debut this year.
He only made his first-class debut this year.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 17:12
HELLO.
HELLO
ANYBODY THERE?
These are all Somerset players,the team we're supposed to support.
Omari has bowled very well in this match and Max hasn't bowled as well.
What's the problem?
Dear me,you really can't please some people.
Trego for England
HELLO
ANYBODY THERE?
These are all Somerset players,the team we're supposed to support.
Omari has bowled very well in this match and Max hasn't bowled as well.
What's the problem?
Dear me,you really can't please some people.
Trego for England
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 17:24
Think we're talking at cross-purposes, CP - I don't mean that Waller (or anybody else) got cheap wickets when we were in Div Two, just that any they got there in the future would be cheaper than would Div One wickets - and I'd rather they learnt their trade at the higher level - even if it's tougher there...not to mention bowling at Taunton!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 18:21
With such a high score two of our bowlers did remarkably well, Thomas and Trego going at below three an over.
The most wickets shared between Willoughby and Banks (they bowled the most overs)
I would have liked Arul Suppiah to have bowl a few more overs, we can't say this time PT was under bowled after bowling 28 overs.
After losing three early wickets we need to get our head down tomorrow.
The most wickets shared between Willoughby and Banks (they bowled the most overs)
I would have liked Arul Suppiah to have bowl a few more overs, we can't say this time PT was under bowled after bowling 28 overs.
After losing three early wickets we need to get our head down tomorrow.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 18:51
17% of the overs as first-change seamer is hardly over-bowled either though, Mike.
Obviously it's hard to comment without having even ghad any commentary today, but the argument that having PT and Zander available legitimises the three-spinner strategy looks a bit thin when between them they've only bowled a fifth of the first innings overs.
I think I'm as disappointed by today as I've been at any point in the last three years.
Obviously it's hard to comment without having even ghad any commentary today, but the argument that having PT and Zander available legitimises the three-spinner strategy looks a bit thin when between them they've only bowled a fifth of the first innings overs.
I think I'm as disappointed by today as I've been at any point in the last three years.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 19:03
Our skipper's antics come as no surprise to the Press anyway: -
'Western Daily Press'
"Then, four deliveries later, Langer was adjudged to have edged Tahir behind the wicketkeeper, where Dominic Cork, the first slip, emerged with the ball in his hand, claiming the catch.
Umpire Nick Cook raised his finger but a clearly furious Langer lingered in his crease before leaving with arms and bat flailing, insisting the ball had only hit his pad.
When he finally set off for the pavilion, the captain angrily turned back towards the pitch on a couple of occasions in an obvious display of dissent that is becoming his trademark."
What's the point of such childlike and churlish behaviour? When the umpire gives you out - you're out.
He is not going to rescind his decision.
IMHO, not a good example for a captain to set, but I am sure that others might view it differently.
'Western Daily Press'
"Then, four deliveries later, Langer was adjudged to have edged Tahir behind the wicketkeeper, where Dominic Cork, the first slip, emerged with the ball in his hand, claiming the catch.
Umpire Nick Cook raised his finger but a clearly furious Langer lingered in his crease before leaving with arms and bat flailing, insisting the ball had only hit his pad.
When he finally set off for the pavilion, the captain angrily turned back towards the pitch on a couple of occasions in an obvious display of dissent that is becoming his trademark."
What's the point of such childlike and churlish behaviour? When the umpire gives you out - you're out.
He is not going to rescind his decision.
IMHO, not a good example for a captain to set, but I am sure that others might view it differently.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 19:37
Not me Clarence.
With the only caveat that this is, of course, only one side of the story (and it is starting to look like someone at the WDP has something of an anti-Langer agenda), such behaviour is totally unacceptable.
With the only caveat that this is, of course, only one side of the story (and it is starting to look like someone at the WDP has something of an anti-Langer agenda), such behaviour is totally unacceptable.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 19:59
Not from me either if that was the case.
I would though,as FE points out,prefer to hear it from somebody other than the WDP.
Sadly some scribes have an agenda with our skipper.
Trego for England
I would though,as FE points out,prefer to hear it from somebody other than the WDP.
Sadly some scribes have an agenda with our skipper.
Trego for England
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 21:10
That maybe the case BJ, but his PR skills aren't maybe JL's best point, as the Telegraph confirms. Quote:
"They departed quietly except Justin Langer who was incensed when Dominic Cork claimed a low slip catch, sanctioned by umpire Nick Cook. He stood his ground then swished his bat angrily before sloping off".
I sincerely hope we do well tomorrow, but I am pretty uncomfortable with our bowling performances of late. Would we not have been better off with a little more fire power against both Sussex & Hants ?
AC was, I believe, available for selection & I know Mr Stiff's radar is a bit inconsistent. However, if the 'spinning' theory didn't work at Taunton, I wonder what made us think it would on a seemingly similar wicket at Hants ?
We have some issues to address in the close season methinks.
Grizzzly
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:08:28:21:20:08 by Grizzzly.
"They departed quietly except Justin Langer who was incensed when Dominic Cork claimed a low slip catch, sanctioned by umpire Nick Cook. He stood his ground then swished his bat angrily before sloping off".
I sincerely hope we do well tomorrow, but I am pretty uncomfortable with our bowling performances of late. Would we not have been better off with a little more fire power against both Sussex & Hants ?
AC was, I believe, available for selection & I know Mr Stiff's radar is a bit inconsistent. However, if the 'spinning' theory didn't work at Taunton, I wonder what made us think it would on a seemingly similar wicket at Hants ?
We have some issues to address in the close season methinks.
Grizzzly
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:08:28:21:20:08 by Grizzzly.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 21:25
If there's one thing I'm sure about over the last few CC matches, its that I'm unsure just what tactics we've been using.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 21:47
I can't personally understand why Omari hasn't been playing all season if he has suddenly become the secret weapon that was supposed to win us the Championship. If spin was the key then Arul surely should have been uised more in both games?
It seems that we have accepted we do not have the pace to win it and therefore we are opting for the other alternative - but we don't have enough of that either.
But Omari Banks as the best option? Why? No offence to him because he hasn't done anything wrong when picked but he isn't a sudden game winner with an eviable record. He's just another of our stock spinning all rounders, he doesn't bowl devil balls or anything like that.
Anyway it was probably a dead rubber but it would have been nice to go down raging rather than like a headless chicken.
But as the guys on the Durham site say - tomorrow is another day and this is only 50% done.
It seems that we have accepted we do not have the pace to win it and therefore we are opting for the other alternative - but we don't have enough of that either.
But Omari Banks as the best option? Why? No offence to him because he hasn't done anything wrong when picked but he isn't a sudden game winner with an eviable record. He's just another of our stock spinning all rounders, he doesn't bowl devil balls or anything like that.
Anyway it was probably a dead rubber but it would have been nice to go down raging rather than like a headless chicken.
But as the guys on the Durham site say - tomorrow is another day and this is only 50% done.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: fRed (IP Logged)
Date: 28/08/2009 23:40
I'd have Turner and Caddy in the side to bounce then out, but what do I know?
Cricket's the winner.
Cricket's the winner.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 06:32
Caddy could be busy cooking!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: wsm fan (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 07:34
MT+DS in for Durham game i say.
May go horribly wrong but best chance of getting 20 wickets i say, may go for a few but both have ability to have that magic spell...
May go horribly wrong but best chance of getting 20 wickets i say, may go for a few but both have ability to have that magic spell...
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 08:33
I anticipated from newspaper reports yesterday that this might happen; the Umpires (Mark Benson and Nick Cook) are reporting Justin Langer for Level One dissent.
Oh dear.
Oh dear.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 08:42
CP, I have just started a thread about three players getting into trouble for showing dissent not knowing you have just posted an update on Justin Langer.
As you say, Oh dear.
As you say, Oh dear.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 09:00
Is Level One the most or least serious?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 09:34
He could be deported halfway around the world on a slave ship.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 09:45
I may have misinterpreted the following, (or indeed not be aware of all the facts - as I confess may well be the case), but it looks as though Justin Langer's two year period was up just before the latest incident.
[www.ecb.co.uk]
[www.ecb.co.uk]
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 09:56
You could be correct CP. Is it calculated on the date or on seasons? (I would think on the date so he may be OK)
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Tractor (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 10:00
The 'level one' remains in place for 2 years, and if it's repeated in that time, they get 3 penalty points. so do it about 8 times and they get a driving ban. I think that's correct.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 10:10
I hope it's not cover 'driving', Tractor - that would be serious.
Anyway, Mr. Langer or not, we need to knuckle down today and try to save this game.
As the dear and late Peter Denning was quoted as often having said in the dressing room - "We gotta fight."
Anyway, Mr. Langer or not, we need to knuckle down today and try to save this game.
As the dear and late Peter Denning was quoted as often having said in the dressing room - "We gotta fight."
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 10:30
Fight,indeed.
Langer made a mistake,he'll be reprimanded.
Let's concentrate on the game now,this is the important business.
Trego for England
Langer made a mistake,he'll be reprimanded.
Let's concentrate on the game now,this is the important business.
Trego for England
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 10:59
The brown stuff is looming at this rate.
Trego for England
Trego for England
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 12:02
Sixth century of the season for the Magnificent Marcus - and he has also just scored his 1500th run of the season. Where would we be without him?
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 12:15
You beat me to it LoL.
Well done Marcus and Craig on keeping the partnership going, that is a good recovery, keep it going after lunch.
Cricinfo got Marcus scoring seven hundreds [stats.cricinfo.com] but who counting.
Well done Marcus and Craig on keeping the partnership going, that is a good recovery, keep it going after lunch.
Cricinfo got Marcus scoring seven hundreds [stats.cricinfo.com] but who counting.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 12:23
How many times has Marcus passed 90 this season?
Why is Zander's Championship form so diametrically opposed to his one-day form?
Great questions of our time!
Why is Zander's Championship form so diametrically opposed to his one-day form?
Great questions of our time!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 12:32
Of course I was wrong. It's seven centuries for MT now and seven fifties. He has passed 90 eleven times.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 12:54
Zander didn't like his decision, according to BBC Radio Solent news. He stood his ground, but eventually had to go.
Perhaps JL will get a driving ban from the golf course.
Perhaps JL will get a driving ban from the golf course.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 13:08
I'm sure Dominic Cork's involvement in both of the "disputed" dismissals of Langer and de Bruyn is entirely coincidental 
.
.Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 13:44
Zander showing dissent?
Ban him for life with that scoundrel Langer.
We can't have this.
Trego for England
Ban him for life with that scoundrel Langer.
We can't have this.
Trego for England
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 14:21
Well done Msrcus & Craig.
Somehwat dissappointinf effort by the others though.
I wonder if Hants will enforce follow on - presume they will.
Grizzzly
Somehwat dissappointinf effort by the others though.
I wonder if Hants will enforce follow on - presume they will.
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 14:30
Come on Grizzzly, we only need 75 to avoid the follow-on and maximum batting points. their last pair scored 80 so can we. (I Hope)
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 14:41
I'm trying to reverse hex the 400 Mike !
Grizzzly
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 14:47
Oh.
I hope that don't double hex your hex making it ...... I confused now.
I hope that don't double hex your hex making it ...... I confused now.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 15:44
Man of the match stuff from Omari,very impressive.
Well rescued lads.
It's backbone like this we need to see,good scrapping.
Trego for England
Well rescued lads.
It's backbone like this we need to see,good scrapping.
Trego for England
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 16:00
Why couldn't Willoughby stay for seven more runs?
I would think Hants will bat again and not enforce the follow-on.
I would think Hants will bat again and not enforce the follow-on.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Streeter (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 16:06
I very much hope so. Would leave us the possibility of a win. I guess it depends on hants ambitions.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 16:09
Given that their spinner had taken so many wickets, Hants had no choice but to enforce the follow-on in the hopes of bowling us out a second time. I just hope they don't succeed.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 16:10
You've gone so far overboard, they may never find you, Jim.
Omari's performance is what one would expect almost every game.
It's them others that have made him look good. We should gauge our performances against those from the Hampshire team.
Once again we have talked a big game, so let's hope we can produce a battling second half. If they do put us in again, it may just be the chance we're looking for to shine.
Tresco battled hard, but otherwise a fairly abject performance.
Omari's performance is what one would expect almost every game.
It's them others that have made him look good. We should gauge our performances against those from the Hampshire team.
Once again we have talked a big game, so let's hope we can produce a battling second half. If they do put us in again, it may just be the chance we're looking for to shine.
Tresco battled hard, but otherwise a fairly abject performance.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 16:14
So I was wrong, I imaging Hants would have like to have bowled last.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 16:48
I quite agree, Mike, I'd have batted again, scoring a quick 200 or so and given us nothing to play for on a turning wicket. The rain doesn't look like affecting the result any further.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 16:51
I'm captain today - and you do as I say!
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 17:02
You have been eavesdropping on Langer again LoL.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 17:10
Taught him everything I know about captaincy ... and it shows.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 17:13
'Scuse me gents,I'm only just back in.
It looks like I'm posting whilst away from the PC again.
Now that is impressive.
Trego for England
It looks like I'm posting whilst away from the PC again.
Now that is impressive.
Trego for England
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 17:14
I'm distraught! I was following the game until we were 390-8 - I was very happy then: 4 batting points, looked a very good chance of getting the fifth, and we'd saved the follow-on.
Have now discovered that not only did we not reach 400, but that follow-on is 150 behind, not 200.
Gutted!
Have now discovered that not only did we not reach 400, but that follow-on is 150 behind, not 200.
Gutted!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 17:18
Don't be gutted, SP. Just watch the runs flow from MT's bat tomorrow.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: wsm fan (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 18:09
Yep, helps the MT 2000 run cause far better, only problem is it gives JL another chance to get himself in trouble...
Although based on last Saturday doubt he'll bat until number 8 at the earliest
Although based on last Saturday doubt he'll bat until number 8 at the earliest
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 18:09
But what happens then? 105 behind 10 wickets up. In order to make this any kind of game we have to score 300 plus in 2 sessions and then have a go.
A draw leaves us nowhere and Durham closer to the title. We have to win to stay a relevant contender and we can only do that by getting Hampshire out again on a spinning pitch with insufficient time.
Will Justin give his big hitters their head tomorrow morning and hope they hit big and quick?
Will he then make an ambitious declaration and trust his spin trio (who he picked for the purpose) to have a go?
Can they take 10 if they have a session (and a half?) at them with the pacemen in support?
Personally I think he'll be too cautious in the morning. I don't think he has faith in the spinners to hold the Hampshire batsmen in check so they'll take the safe draw and aim for second in the Championship.
Not exciting. Not guts, glory and backbone.
But highly sensible and realistic I suppose. Don't lose being the main aim.
A draw leaves us nowhere and Durham closer to the title. We have to win to stay a relevant contender and we can only do that by getting Hampshire out again on a spinning pitch with insufficient time.
Will Justin give his big hitters their head tomorrow morning and hope they hit big and quick?
Will he then make an ambitious declaration and trust his spin trio (who he picked for the purpose) to have a go?
Can they take 10 if they have a session (and a half?) at them with the pacemen in support?
Personally I think he'll be too cautious in the morning. I don't think he has faith in the spinners to hold the Hampshire batsmen in check so they'll take the safe draw and aim for second in the Championship.
Not exciting. Not guts, glory and backbone.
But highly sensible and realistic I suppose. Don't lose being the main aim.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 20:06
We also need to stop Hants winning, as a good run for them could adveresly affect our final position and prize money.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 20:43
I feel I did Craig a disservice earlier, as I hadn't realised how significant a contribution he had made. Well done also to CK.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: wsm fan (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 21:08
I make that 1521 championship runs for Marcus at 80.05 and 928 for Craig at 58.00, keep it up lads
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 21:15
1547 for MT at 81.42 now - but have you seen the question on PQQ about what happens when he scores another 127 after today's first innings?
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: wsm fan (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 21:22
I was only including completed innings but yes if you take his current overnight notout then 1547 it is, should be closing in on the 1800 barrier after batting all day tomorrow so looks like being 2000 being hit sometime during the Durham game!!!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 21:31
That seems perfectly reasonable to me.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 22:03
Why don't we play Marcus and ten bowlers?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: wsm fan (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 22:16
Marcus could bowl too, why worry about the other 10...
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: fRed (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 23:19
I'd have him umpire as well.
Cricket's the winner.
Cricket's the winner.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 29/08/2009 23:29
We will bat tomorrow for as long as poss. If we were to go at 5 an over we should be 100 ahead at lunch with 60 overs left, add another 100 and Hants would have a target of 200 in 40 overs... Can't see that happening. Looks like an 8 pt draw
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 07:38
To be 100 ahead by lunch would mean scoring 205 runs in the morning session, I can't see Somerset managing that even on a good day.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 10:54
Maybe the weather will have a say, as we've had plenty of autumnal weather this morning.
It's thoroughly miserable and depressing. As for the forecast for gales and heavy rain. I think we'll have to move the steam fair and Dorset County Show to the Mediterranean!
It's thoroughly miserable and depressing. As for the forecast for gales and heavy rain. I think we'll have to move the steam fair and Dorset County Show to the Mediterranean!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 11:15
When Jusin came in after Arul that said "shut up shop people we're taking the draw". Good luck to Marcus andloads of runs today but that is our Championship over ladies and gentlemen. We had to win this game to have any chance of overhauling Durham but now the game at Chester LS is going to be all about pride but a dead rubber in relation to the competition.
Pro40 push is the way to go now let's see that glint of silver in the winter.
Pro40 push is the way to go now let's see that glint of silver in the winter.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 11:20
I'm sure you're right, Grockle, although he is scoring faster than Marcus.
Whover said that Marcus should umpire as well would certainly have the backing of MR Langer.
Whover said that Marcus should umpire as well would certainly have the backing of MR Langer.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 12:28
Second place will be well worth having, financially speaking as well as pride in improving on last year.
If we can get that to add to a strong Pro40 showing (hopefully winning it!), the 20-20 Final and an improved FPT this year, that will be a pretty good season, in my books.
If we can get that to add to a strong Pro40 showing (hopefully winning it!), the 20-20 Final and an improved FPT this year, that will be a pretty good season, in my books.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 12:42
Yes, "a pretty good season" indeed, that would be SheptonPaul.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 13:11
It's all looking a bit "Whoops" at the moment.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 13:15
Banger fails in the 2nd innings only getting 73.
If the tail wags and we get 100 in from I'm sure our spinners will run through them in next to no time.
If the tail wags and we get 100 in from I'm sure our spinners will run through them in next to no time.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:18
Outside chance we could lose this yet!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Congar (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:19
8 wickets down now and it's not looking good.
Isn't it supposed to rain there today?
Isn't it supposed to rain there today?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:23
A shame that James Hildreth has had an off game.
Won't do his touring chances much good.
Grizzzly
Won't do his touring chances much good.
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:34
Whatever the result, we have to face the fact that only three players 'turned up' for this game. Banger, CK & Banks.
As I write this we are about 125 ahead, with one wicket left.
Anyone know how many overs remaining ?
Grizzzly
As I write this we are about 125 ahead, with one wicket left.
Anyone know how many overs remaining ?
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: wsm fan (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:38
287-9, lead of 132, can't be more than 15/16 left, 2 for the change of innings too?
Can't imagine J; will rush through the overs, bad light, rain, here's hoping...
Can't imagine J; will rush through the overs, bad light, rain, here's hoping...
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Congar (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:44
I am sure that Cricinfo used to give "Overs remaining for the day" before they went to the ne format.
I hope you are right wsm but I think it might be a few more overs than that.
I hope you are right wsm but I think it might be a few more overs than that.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:47
Quote:Grizzzly
Whatever the result, we have to face the fact that only three players 'turned up' for this game. Banger, CK & Banks.
Grizzzly
Don't you think, Grizzzly that Waller has made a more than useful contribution as a number ten batsman?
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:53
Possibly LoL.
(Did you type that before or after he was just out ?!)
Grizzzly
So Hants need 140 to win - around 15 overs or so ? Looks like 20/20 will be on show then !
(Did you type that before or after he was just out ?!)
Grizzzly
So Hants need 140 to win - around 15 overs or so ? Looks like 20/20 will be on show then !
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Tractor (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:55
They had 17 overs last night. Total of 94 in our innings, so 77 bowled today, they lose 2 for the innings changeover so I reckon they've got 17 overs to get 139 runs. Squeaky bottom time.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Congar (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 15:55
I think Max seems to be improving his batting. He must have confirmed his place as our LBG bowler of the future as he seems to beat MM in all three basic skills.
Hants need 140 to win. What is the situation re: overs, weather etc.?
Hants need 140 to win. What is the situation re: overs, weather etc.?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:01
Maybe I should apologise, Grizzzly, for complimenting Waller on his batting just before he got out, but I happen to know (as I am captain for the day) that he was acting under orders, it being recognised that the only way we can win this match is to give ourselves time to bowl Hampshire out.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:03
Yep - it was silly of me to miss that !
Grizzzly
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:07
It's been cold and wet here for most of the day, yet only 50 miles West, they play all day!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:09
Not now they don't Both.
Bad light stopped play at 9-0.
Bet Hants are pleased about that !
Grizzzly
Bad light stopped play at 9-0.
Bet Hants are pleased about that !
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:10
Don't get that.
I thought the batsmen had the right to refuse an offer of bad light ?
Grizzzly
I thought the batsmen had the right to refuse an offer of bad light ?
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:10
Robbed of a certain win, we are.
Robbed, I say.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Robbed, I say.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:24
Bad light is now the sole preserve of the umpires and has been all season.
Moving to the Pro40, Yorkshire batsman Adam Lyth, who looked awful against us at Taunton a few Sundays back, has certainly done us a favour at Scarborough today.
He hit 109 off 95 balls against Sussex, who are currently ahead of Somerset by a point but after today will have played two more games. Yorkshire reached a handy 254-2, and Sussex in reply are currently 67-2 after 12 (Joyce out, but Goodwin at the wicket).
Moving to the Pro40, Yorkshire batsman Adam Lyth, who looked awful against us at Taunton a few Sundays back, has certainly done us a favour at Scarborough today.
He hit 109 off 95 balls against Sussex, who are currently ahead of Somerset by a point but after today will have played two more games. Yorkshire reached a handy 254-2, and Sussex in reply are currently 67-2 after 12 (Joyce out, but Goodwin at the wicket).
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:36
Oh dear.
How sad.
Never mind.
Actually I think the weather gods owe us one. Over the piece they have been more agin us than for us.
How sad.
Never mind.
Actually I think the weather gods owe us one. Over the piece they have been more agin us than for us.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:39
I have just come in after watching Bridgwater v Glastonbury.
Looks like a draw to me.
Don't forget when talking about overs left there is always a minimum in the last hour 15 or 16, I can never remember.
Looks like a draw to me.
Don't forget when talking about overs left there is always a minimum in the last hour 15 or 16, I can never remember.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:41
Update from Bridgwater, Mike?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:45
It's 16, Mike, but this may be irrelevant now, anyway.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Lydeard Rob (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 16:49
according to BBC sport result is a draw
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 17:09
CJM, sadly you may have spoken too soon. Smith has currently hit 25 off 10 balls!
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 17:10
CJ-M 17.24: "Bad light is now the sole preserve of the umpires and has been all season."
Thanks for clarifying that CJ-M. I wasn't aware of that.
I wonder why they brought that rule in ? It seems pretty nonsensical that play can be stopped, presumably due to 'undue risk to the batsmen', yet the latter have no right of refusal.
Can you imagine Justin's reaction if it was us batting in the same situation ?!!
Ah well, we've lost enough time this year due to the Weather, so I guess we were due a favour.
Grizzzly
Thanks for clarifying that CJ-M. I wasn't aware of that.
I wonder why they brought that rule in ? It seems pretty nonsensical that play can be stopped, presumably due to 'undue risk to the batsmen', yet the latter have no right of refusal.
Can you imagine Justin's reaction if it was us batting in the same situation ?!!
Ah well, we've lost enough time this year due to the Weather, so I guess we were due a favour.
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 17:14
I think it is still about "undue risk", Grizzzly, but not exclusively about risk to the batsmen.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 19:18
I d=on't want to be negative, but it seems to me that Andy Hurry's comments on the game on the other site completely miss the point.
Yes, our batting was - selectively - good, but how on earth can we ever expect to win the Championship with a bowling attack like that ?
Come to think of it - silence might indeed be the best option.
Grizzzly
Yes, our batting was - selectively - good, but how on earth can we ever expect to win the Championship with a bowling attack like that ?
Come to think of it - silence might indeed be the best option.
Grizzzly
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 19:33
Durham do have the strongest bowling attack that is why they are at the top, until ours is as good we will always be the bridesmaid.
On a positive note out batting is stronger than theirs.
Total championship runs so far.
Trescothick 1594
Kieswetter 998
Hildreth 860
Suppiah 927
I have only quoted those I think will only reach thousand runs for the season (or already have).
On a positive note out batting is stronger than theirs.
Total championship runs so far.
Trescothick 1594
Kieswetter 998
Hildreth 860
Suppiah 927
I have only quoted those I think will only reach thousand runs for the season (or already have).
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: wsm fan (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 20:03
6 innings for Marcus then potentially and 406 runs to get, probably going to need 3 tons to get there, and some nice weather...
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 20:40
I am not asking anyone to believe it, but I have just found this report filed yesterday by the ‘Western Daily Press’ : -
“Langer's future with Somerset next year is uncertain. He has not yet been offered a new contract and looks increasingly likely to leave. He said: "I will decide my future at the end of the season."
[www.thisisbristol.co.uk]
“Langer's future with Somerset next year is uncertain. He has not yet been offered a new contract and looks increasingly likely to leave. He said: "I will decide my future at the end of the season."
[www.thisisbristol.co.uk]
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/08/2009 21:48
We had this a while ago. The press conference after the semi at the T2 effectively gave the same spin on his future. Has to be done IMHO
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 09:18
I agree with you, Grockle, in respect of Somerset's overseas player for 2010 and beyond.
The end of the season (when and if we know for certain) will be the appropriate time to pay tribute to what Justin has done for Somerset over the past few years.
Back to the game at the Rose Bowl - we fought back well to save this one. A good team performance.
Into the final month of the season, and still a lot to play for.
The end of the season (when and if we know for certain) will be the appropriate time to pay tribute to what Justin has done for Somerset over the past few years.
Back to the game at the Rose Bowl - we fought back well to save this one. A good team performance.
Into the final month of the season, and still a lot to play for.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Ronnie sabre (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 10:12
Think thats right CP. Overseas bowler and maybe another domestic one are badly needed. Who though is another matter?
Hants had us where we wanted them in respect of the last game and I think if the wicket was spinning then it was a good effort to stop them.
Hopefully we can win one or two of our last games to clinch second.
On the Pro40 I just hope the weather doesn't intervene what with Sussex winning the last 2 games. I would really like it if Notts could do us a favour and turn them over next week. Might give us the leeway we need.
Hants had us where we wanted them in respect of the last game and I think if the wicket was spinning then it was a good effort to stop them.
Hopefully we can win one or two of our last games to clinch second.
On the Pro40 I just hope the weather doesn't intervene what with Sussex winning the last 2 games. I would really like it if Notts could do us a favour and turn them over next week. Might give us the leeway we need.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 10:42
If you saw Nottinghamshire`s bowling capitulated to Worcestershire in the televised Pro40 match on Saturday, RS, escorting them home with ample balls to spare, you wouldn`t bet against Sussex under the Hove floodlights (if they are working!) next Monday.
Notts are also resting some key players in the Pro40; can`t see Sussex doing that.
Notts are also resting some key players in the Pro40; can`t see Sussex doing that.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 11:20
No harm in hoping though CJM. Surely we're allowed that.
And also, should they not then be penalised for fielding an understrength team. After all they played their strongest team against us. When two teams are going for a title surely they owe it to both those teams to play as hard against each. That would happen in football in Scotland where I come from.
And also, should they not then be penalised for fielding an understrength team. After all they played their strongest team against us. When two teams are going for a title surely they owe it to both those teams to play as hard against each. That would happen in football in Scotland where I come from.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 11:30
I was also thinking that about not playing your strongest team, it is part of the ECB rules.
Quote.
Full Strength Teams
All Counties shall field a full strength team in all matches
in The LV County Championship, the Friends Provident
Trophy, the Twenty20 Cup and the NatWest Pro40
(see also ECB Directives).
Is it one of those rules that is not enforced?
Quote.
Full Strength Teams
All Counties shall field a full strength team in all matches
in The LV County Championship, the Friends Provident
Trophy, the Twenty20 Cup and the NatWest Pro40
(see also ECB Directives).
Is it one of those rules that is not enforced?
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 12:11
It's a difficult rule to prove really, Mike.
I suppose if Somerset left Out Marcus it might not be easy to defend such a charge. Although having said that I suppose you just say that he has a slight niggle.
I suppose if Somerset left Out Marcus it might not be easy to defend such a charge. Although having said that I suppose you just say that he has a slight niggle.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 16:40
I've had a slight niggle since I was fifteen - that SCCC has left me out of every match since then.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 16:44
It's inexplicable, LoL.
Or did they see you play?
That was my problem.
Or did they see you play?
That was my problem.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 16:46
I think it must have been SCCC's obsession with substance over style. I certainly wasn't, never have been and never will be overweight.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 16:50
Yes, I suppose all that running and keep-fit does the trick.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 16:54
Bobstan: for the second time today I am having to tell you to wash your mouth out. Funnily enough it was only yesterday that I added another to my growing list of oxymorons, namele Fun Run.
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-one Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 17:18
There was a time when I didn't consider it oxymoronic, LoL
Now I consider myself moronic for having done all that running. My knees think it was rather silly, too.
Now I consider myself moronic for having done all that running. My knees think it was rather silly, too.
Re: The Spin Twins
Posted by: wsm fan (IP Logged)
Date: 31/08/2009 19:13
Who is this overseas bowler we need then?
I don't dispute a quality overseas bowler would be most welcome, however
* They need to be available for the MAJORITY of the season *
If not i personally would much prefer JL (or eqivalent quality senior batsmen) from April to September than say Steyn (for example) for 6 weeks and then he gets called to a training camp then orderred to rest etc.
I don't dispute a quality overseas bowler would be most welcome, however
* They need to be available for the MAJORITY of the season *
If not i personally would much prefer JL (or eqivalent quality senior batsmen) from April to September than say Steyn (for example) for 6 weeks and then he gets called to a training camp then orderred to rest etc.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
