Well - having polished off his last quotient, OldPete repaired post haste to his study (left) to produce some more cerebral questions impervious to "common thinking"! This one is about artists - but I suspect not the type that inhabit these boards and the Maltshovel come Fridays
Can you get the picture -- all about artists and connected stuff.
(1) What is a rigger ?
(2) In the 14/ 15th Century what might a wealthy noble man insist on being used when commissioning a painting order to display his wealth ?
(3) Whose landscapes - what ever the season were famous for snow. ?
(4) Why was the backdrop to an address by a US Secretary of State changed ?
(5) What is the connection between a lady novellist and naked ladies in Camden Town .
(6) Whose red period began in 1944 and lasted all his life.
Patricia Corwall is in the view of some obssessed - she has even bought Sickert paintings and cut them open to see if there are secret messages in them !!!
The backdrop to a UN statement was Picassos Geurnica - Colin Powell was about to stand in front of it to give forth on WMDS in Iraq and nore or less launch Gulf 2 - the bombing of Guernica was not considered a suitable backdrop and was covered up. So the Americans did see the irony for once.
Sarge - you thinking in the rigt way - but not gold leaf . Put it like this Gold leaf would have been the bling of that period - the classy geezer would have wanted something else .
Not as silly as it sounds even if it were wrong. In old portraits the landed gentry would often have, if they owned one, a peacock in the background of their portraits, as they were expensive at the time it was a way of saying 'i'm considerably richer than yow'. Bit like having you photo taken leaning on your Ford Capri nowadays.
Going through Google putting every landscape artist I could think of with 'snow' after their name. Luckily Mr Constable was third or fourth on that list.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment.
We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals.
We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards.
If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing
abuse@sportnetwork.net