Username
Password
Notts Part 2 - Sunday

Ben Back?
By Grockle
August 9 2008
Given that the weather forecast for Sunday is a much better than Saturday's we can look forward to a full game. but who will be in the "Grey and Joker Red" looking to improve our Pro40 chances? If there are any changes from the CC side it will come in the batting line-up which once again failed to build on a good opening partnership. The bowling fired but will Ben Phillips be looking to return?

v Nottinghamshire Pro40 @ Taunton Sunday 10 August 2008

Scorecard

Three games and 1 win to our name.  The position is still recoverable according to BR but it won't be if this becomes loss number 3 I wouldn't think. So will the selectors stay with the master plan or will today see changes being made to bolster up the batting and introduce more assertive spin bowling?

One would assume that the openers will not be touched because effectively they have done nothing wrong all season.  There might be a move to push Justin back to 3 but the question is then 'who do you pull in?'.  There have been forum comments about giving Neil Edwards a one day berth but that doesn't seem to be in the plan.  So Marcus Trescothick and Justin Langer will be expected to lead our batting.

Zander de Bruyn will provide the possible anchor at 3 and the bosses have kept faith with James Hildreth during the majority of the season so I doubt things wil change.  He seemed to settle well in the second innings of the Championship game but then seemed to have a 'thought shower' and smacked exactly the wrong ball to a fielder.  I expect to see him at 4.

Poor shot selection has probably done for any return of Ian Blackwell to the one day side despite the need for a tighter spin option.  His misjudgement in the first CC innings and awful shot in the second will stand against him and as he didn't bowl there is little on the plus side in the eyes of those who wrte the team sheet at the moment.  Peter Trego  will therefore take the number 5 spot or move back one for Arul Suppiah who is exected to come in at Ian's expense.

Craig will keep so number 7 is covered and then there is a real question about who will find places in the last 4 spots.  Caddick may rest so Charl Willoughby will take the eleventh spot and one would expect Alfonso Thomas to take one of the others.  That leaves a possible five players looking for the chance to take one of two places. 

Steffan Jones - good CC match with the bat aggressive with the ball at the end of the third day.  May lose out if....

Ben Phillips - has been seen bowling in the intervals but we're not sure if he's fit.  If he is he will play.

Omari Banks - extra bat/spin option?  Hasn't impressed on a consistent basis and will not play if the weather is damp-ish (unless Arul doesn't)

Michael Munday - real outsider but had 10 wickets in the seconds and they know him of old.  Very doubtful

Mark Turner - an outsider?  Could use him as a surprise pick and hope his pace gives Notts the jitters.  I'll personally be surprised to see him.

On that basis one would expect to see seam options and they would be Jonah and Ben with Mark coming in if there is an injury scenarion that keeps Phillips  out.  I doubt there will be room for two spinners and Arul's performance in the seconds game would put him in pole position for tomorrow....and maybe replacing Ian in the Tuesday game because of his more consistent performances with the bat.  But that's for later.

Gates open at 11:45.

The side is almost as expected except he plays his three spinners. Omari gets the second spinner spot and we do not see the return of PhillipsSteff stays in. Wes gets a chance with the bat although I don't expect him to bowl and Trigger is rested?  Lots of faith in Banks - time for him to justify it.

Notts win the toss and choose to bat and go off at quite a pace against Willoughby and Jones.  It's sunny with the odd shower at the moment and once again they are playing on a wicket one over from the Championship (in front of the last third of the Botham) - central almost.  Jefferson and Swann open for them and although Willoughby gets Swann early (caught by de Bruyn) with only 15 up, they go at 6+ an over for the first 10 with Jonah going for 35 off his first 5 and the batsmen sharing the spoils. 

This brings about a change at 12 with Zander coming on at the River and Thomas joining him at the OP for the 13th.  Showers are still smattering the place but not enough to get them off the pitch.  de Bruyn seems to be up for today and he produces a wicket maiden for his second catching Wagh LBW at 84 trying to pull him.  But Will Jefferson is taking a liking to Alfonso who he deposits onto the roof of the cowshed in the 15th.  We aren't slowing them down at the moment as they move to 96 at the end of the 16th.

The 100 arrives at the end of the next one and announces the arrival at the River end of Omari Banks for his first spell.  Unfortunately we have to wait for it because it also announces the arrival of a torrential downpour which forces the players off and the cover on but disappears almost before the sheet is on the strip.  This game has to finish by about 7:30 but we don't lose overs as they reduce the time between innings instead and the players are back on the pitch in 5 minutes in order for Omari to bamboozle them. Voges has a good look at him, is fooled by the last one and he goes for a very creditable 4.

Jefferson goes to his first 50 of the season (probably why he isn't playing Championship cricket) in the 19th off 56 balls with 4 fours and a six and after 20 they are still moving at about 6 an over with 112in their 'run bag'.  But they don't get to 120 unscathed as Thomas gets Jefferson playing across the line and Arul  takes the catch at 117.  Patel replaces him as Zander changes ends to the OP for the 23rd.

We are witness to a surprising event as the Outlaws move towards the 150 mark as Zander gets Patel to go over the infield and Arul drops a semi-sitter on the boundary.  Not something you see every day and not really something we wanted today because not long after that Ptel brings up the 50 with a one bounce four to the open area by the cowshed.  At the end of the 29th they are 156 for 3 with the little man on 18 and Voges on 35.  This is the base for a big push towards the 250+ score although Banks is keeping it moderately tight at the River and fools Patel with a quicker ball which he misses and Craig stumps him on the leg side.  157 for 4.

164 after 30 overs so 250 is on if they push it.  Zander  has bowled his 8 and his one wicket cost 41.  Fair to middling and his last only went for 4.  Omari finishes just after him and his wicket went for 36 - the best he's bowled in a full allocation of overs. A decent session for him and only 4 off his last as well.  Steffan is back on at the OP with the jb of keeping the 'press' on. but he goes for 9 and Voges celebrates his 50 off 58 balls with 5 fours. 

There are questions about the next choice with Arul on for the first time at the River and they finish his 34th on 187.  Decent start mr SuppiahAlfonso now takes over at the OP to finish his spell and one would expect to see Charl at the other for his last 2 although don't put money on it yet.  Shafayat is looking to get Thomas away but a large full toss from the little man in the 35th is missed and he loses his off AND leg stump while the middle one stays up!! 191 for 5 and in strides Matt Wood for a bit of a thrash.  Woody versus Thommo  with his tail up...this could be intersting.  Well he's off the mark and they have 192 with 5 to go.

But that was all she wrote for Woody as his return to the County Ground ends quickly and not particularly happily as he tries to glance Arul down the leg side and is bowled around his legs for 1 and Notts move to 192 for 6. Mark Ealham last two balls as he smacks the second one he faces straight to Justin. 192 for 7 and Arul has justified his selection today and has possibly put into question Ian Blackwell's championship appearance for Tuesday's game against Surrey. 

Thommo gives them little in the 37th and they still haven't broken the 200 barrier with 3 to go.  Arul stays on (not surprisingly) at the River for the 38th and it comes up off the 2nd ball but he only gives them 5.  202 as Alfonso bowls the 39th and we've held them really well in the second half of this innings irrespective of what happens in these 12 balls.  Omari doesn't help letting one through for four. 

But Thommo finishes with 2 for 42. 212 with 6 to go and Arul has the last one.  2 boundaries from the first two balls for Franks and he puts the third into the scoreboard seats and the fourth into the carpark beyond it.  The fifth goes into the Botham without a bounce and they get 2 off the last one - 28 off the over and all to Franks (4,4,6,6,6,2).  Errr - you know the bit in italics?  Forget I wrote it!!  We need 241 to win!!  Arul still finishes with 2 for 37 off his 4 which means he had 2 for 9 before that massive "Franksfest" of a last over. 

Our start?  "Usual Start" is the comment from a supporter.  Justin inside edges the first one for four after a massive 'wahoo' and is caught inside edging the second.  What the hell is going on?  4 for 1 after 2 balls.  Craig Kieswetter is in at number 3 (no Trego).  Marcus is then nearly run out ball four coming down the wicket while CW stays exactly where he is.  4 for 1 after 6 balls from Schreck.  Andre Adams is on to do mayhem at the other end and MT is nearly run out again at the end of the over as he looks to get on strike on a single that isn't one and has to scramble back.

We have moved, scarily on to 24 after 5 overs but it's not settled and commanding at the moment one has to say - lots of scrambled singles.  By the 15th we've pushed it on to 74 and we look a bit more settled.  Craig is putting bat to ball solidly but we still only see glimpses of Marcus in full flow.  Andre Adams isn't particularly impressed as Kieswetter murders him but we still don't look in command.

Greame Swann comes on at the River end for over 17 and this is where we lost it in the Championship game  we've played spinners poorly and Swann certainly had a significant influnce in the longer meeting between the sides.  Have we learned anything? Well if we have it isn't immediately obvious as Craig tries to hit big shots off most of the balls he faces rather than having a look and Marcus is completely foxed and is bowled for 29 off the first ball he faces.  When did we forget how to play spin?

77 for 2 at the end of the 17th and in comes Zander de Bruyn to show his colleagues how to play a slow bowler.  Meanwhile Ealham is trundling in at the other end but will probably soon be replaced by Patel or anyone who can spin one or two unless we show some application.  Swann's second over shows that ZdB hasn't got a clue either.

Craig fulfills his role as number 3 batsman by going to a 72 ball 50 with 6 fours and even though Patel does come on at the OP end we pass 100 in the 23rd but we are 20 runs behind the D/L requirement.  It doesn't get any better when Swann bowls the keeper playing a backfoot defensive shot to a ball that beats him and takes out his off stump.  57 is commendable but the loss f his wicket doesn't help the momentum. 104 for 3 with James Hildreth the next man in. 

The two batsmen look to push it along and certainly Hildreth looks better against Swann but the 'ask' is getting bigger all the time and at the end of the 28th over they need 105 off 12 overs.  Patel has changed ends and with 10 an over required and a solid batsman and one out of form at the crease it doesn't look like a confident prediction to suggest a Somerset win.  However as Hildreth puts Pattel's first ball of the 29th into the new stand that may be too pessimistic.  Especially as he puts the next "Patel Pill" to the Botham boundary.  It's 92 off 11 and "Jim" starts on Adams with 10 off his first two of over 30 and takes us past the 150.

With 15 off the 30th Notts bring Swann back on and Hildreth misjudges one and puts it straight up in the air and into Shafayet's gloves.  The hopes move down a gear again and it all falls on Wes's shoulders.  James hit 38 off 22 balls with 3 sixes ad the same number of fours.  Shame really but at least we are back in the hunt for a while needing 70 off 9 with Zander on 40 and Wes yet to score but he is the batsman you could do with at this end because he will keep the scoreboard ticking and make de Bruyn run or hit big.  Franks is on at the OP and we need 66 off 8 - four is not enough.

Zander does look to push it along, taking a two off the first ball of Swann's last over but he is then bowled trying to leg glance it for a good 44.  177 for 5 needing 64 off 46 balls. Arul  is going to be Wes's partner for the last bit of this innings. At least Swann may finish before they do!! Swann puts in 8/1/35/4 - and may have won this for his side.

61 off 7 as Arul faces Frank.  They all think he's hit the first but the umpire doesn't and it puts the Notts man off as the next ball is a wide. 2 off the next...these two will run everything.

The 34th over sees the ball being changed and we need one big over to neutralise the Franks 40th.  They need a tight over to put it out of our reach and Mark Ealham is on at the River to keep the Somerset men in check.  It's fitting that it is down to Arul to be involved in winning this one if we actually do that but the 34th doesn't seem to be that vital 6 balls until Wes puts Mark into the new stand and we need 45 off 5. Franks v Durston brings us to 199 off the first 2.  Franks v Suppiah brings up the 200 but he is really struggling to put bat to ball at all.  Notts are back on the boundary so Wes does the obvious and puts it into the pavilion for 6.  he then hits a four off the last ball - excellent.  31 off 4 looks more like it - we need no daft stuff.

Patel in on at the River and Arul is facing.  He gets Wes on strike and he sixes him into the new stand once again.  They move it on to 222 - 19 off 3.  Notts throw Ealham in at the OP end to try and keep this in their sights.  Wes is facing and while trying to smash him is bowled for a fighting 36 off 30 balls that put us back in this game. 

In comes Omari Banks and he takes a single off his first.  Arul goes for the safe option and takes the single as well and that is how the over goes so we have 226 at the end of it.  14 off 2.  Franks is back on at the River.  Banks is facing - single.   Arul puts a full toss away and we go below a run a ball for the first time.  He starts to hit the ball, a second four to the new stand puts it down to 5 off 8. Then 5 off 7. Banks runs for the next single and we have both batsmen at the same end.  Arul tries to get up the other end but fails and he is run out on 326 - headless chicken time!! In comes Alfonso but not to face. The scamble another single and it's 4 off the last over with the West Indian on strike.

Last over Ealham v Banks ball 1 - dot. Ball 2 - dot. Ball 3 - single. Ball 4 - single and finally Ball 5 - two!!  We win with a ball to go.  Thank the son of God for that!! A victory by three wickets with a ball to spare.  Well done to Wes Durston for bringing us back into this one and well done to the whle side for sticking with it and getting us there.  One of those sticking out vein ones that doesn;t do the heart rate or the stress level any good at all!

But two points is two points guys and gals and we are still in this Pro40 thing!!  Nite!!

 

 

  

View a Printer Friendly version of this Story.

Bookmark or share this story with:

Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockles.com (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 14:22

Notts Part 2 - Sunday

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 17:54

Does the wifi still work? I need to check-in online for my Monday flight?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 18:00

I know you want us to ask where your going Wurzel but I'm not going to.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 18:03

Yep and I'm not going to ask either



(Sm72)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 19:21

When did they launch the direct flight from Dorchester to Taunton Wurzel ?!

Grizzzly

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 19:26

I'm going somwhere hot and steamy!

How about the wifi answer, Grockle?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 19:37

Grockle may have answered your question wurzel with the "Yep"



http://i450.photobucket.com/albums/qq223/imagetony48/Smiley-photographer-animationTony.gif

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Palairet (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 21:12

I am glad to see Wes Durston's name in the 13 for tomorrow.

Let us hope that he is given a chance.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 22:10

I'm amazed. I'm a big fan of Wes, but he's not helped his cause, this year, by some average performances in the 1 day stuff.

With the competition for places, this year, being so fierce, players must seize the opportunity and I hope Wes does this, as Arul has.

I just hope the pitch dries out and we avoid the showers. We've not enjoyed the best of weather for home games.

We seem to have about 4 inches of rain in Dorchester, today!

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 22:37

That'll cause problems with landings at Dorchester International won't it?

I'm trying to think who Wes will be in instead of and unless they expect to go with a two spin attack I can't. Wes has always provided good service with the bat but he hasn't done it with the ball on the few occasions he's been given the opportunity and seemed to be in fourth position (possibly) third in the pecking order as batsman/slow bowler.

Good for him that he's back in the frame and good luck to him if he gets the chance.

Oh and in case 'Yep' confused the issue - the Wi-Fi is working as far as I know.



(Sm72)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 22:45

Nottinghamshire to decide in the morning whether Chris Read is fit to play. Otherwise they have named the 11 from the championship match plus Paul Franks.

Also on the injured wicket-keeper front, I see Ambrose broke his little finger at the end of the second day at The Oval, but still played today with the help of painkillers.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 09/08/2008 23:12

He nearly took a blinder with that broken finger as well. I hope Chris plays because any chance that man has to show why he should be somewhere else but Taunton is a chance I wouldn't begrudge him.

On every level he should be the England keeper and it is a continuing problem that we pick people for that position on something other than merit.

Maybe the only way to get Read into the position is get his Notts boss into the Peter Moores position because that seems to be what is required.



(Sm72)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:09:23:45:57 by Grockle.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 07:55

In theory, if not in practice, Peter Moores should be a good judge of wicket-keepers. He was one himself.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 11:57

Reporting live from the CG. Overcast, but small patches of blue sky and fairly bright.

I have draped my Blackwell shirt, from the balcony in support of my hero.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 12:16

You're a bit of an anarchist on the sly Wurzel aren't you?
John Lydon has got nothing on you.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 12:20

Quote:
Big Jim
You're a bit of an anarchist on the sly Wurzel aren't you?
John Lydon has got nothing on you.

I'll be whatever you want me to be, Jim, but I haven't a clue who John Lydon is!

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 13:23

Notts have won the toss and will bat.

Trego replaced by Durston. Jones plays instead of Phillips. It doesn't get any better.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 13:25

What does Omari Banks do that makes him a regular choice?

Perhaps we have to play him a certain number of times. Sheer madness.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:10:14:27:15 by wurzel.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 13:57

First wicket to Willo. A poor ball (full toss), mis-timed to mid-off, caught easily by Zander.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 14:09

Omari isn't a Kolpak

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 14:33

I'll just let Wurz report on here as I've only just arrived and get on with the frontpage stuff.

Thanks W for keeping people abreast of what was going on while I drank Italian coffee with a very nice person in a local coffee shop. Did get to the gym though!!



(Sm72)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 14:55

A pleasure, Grockle.

Zander and Thomo now bowling pretty tidyly and our fielding is sharp. Umbrellas are up, so I've moved away from Tractor's perch, back to my cocoon.

Tractor's friend Bill has just complained to the stewards about me standing in, what is apparently a no standing area, so I just hopped through the barrier, which was ok.

They're off for rain!(Sm24)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 15:02

Play resumes, with no overs lost.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 15:08

Must be our biggest crowd of the season, apart from 20/20. Most seats are taken, including the new stand.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 15:14

Thommo to Jefferson to Arul at 117. Three down.



(Sm72)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 15:29

I've just been moved by an over zealous steward. He told me it was a sterile area. I said, "since when". He told me 2 hours 48 minutes and 37 seconds ago. Which is very strange because before he appeared I had been stood in the same place, allowed by two other stewards.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 15:31

A rarity, Arul has just dropped a catch on the mid-wicket boundary.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 15:38

I'm delighted to report that Banks is bowling really well. He needs to, to keep out my hero!

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 15:42

Patel is out stumped, bowler Banks.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 16:06

Shafayatt ties to reverse sweep Thommo and loses two of his stumps. 191-5

Matt Wood bowled by Suppiah, sweeping, for 1. 192-6

Ealham ct Durston, bowled Suppiah 0 192-7



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:10:16:11:38 by wurzel.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 16:28

The wheels are coming off. Two misfields on the boundary, 1 by De Bruyn, the other by Banks, very costly as it kept the big-hitter on strike. 4-4-6-6-4-2 off last over from Suppiah.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 16:40

Sorry Wurzel but neither Shafayet or Wood were out sweeping. Shaf missed a full toss and Woody was trying to glance it down the legside and was bowled around his legs.



(Sm72)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Palairet (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 16:42

I have just been listening to the radio commentary on Somerset Sound when Arul (having previously bowled very well apparently) was left to bowl the final over.

Both commentators, before the over began, thought that this was a strange decision of Langer's, because some of the quicker bowlers still had overs in hand.

As we now know, Arul's bowling was attacked in that final over, but the fact that annoyed the former Somerset player Mark Davies, who was commentating, was the fact that Justin Langer had his back to the bowler whilst Arul was being taken apart and no one, other than the wicket keeper Craig Kieswetter, spoke to Arul to give him any advice or encouragement.

Perhaps Langer's attitude, leadership and man management skills are one of the reasons why we have failed to deliver the goods in the one day game this year.

I am obviously not there to see it, but hearing reports like that do make me angry!

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: The Diamond ruled ok (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 16:54

You can add his rns in the P40 to that list Palairet . Two poor goes in 6 days now .

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 17:00

I think it could be said that I'm not a fan of JL as one day captain, his deicions have baffled me for the last two seasons.

Re your two corrections, Grockle, I have conferred with the good folk around me and we all would like to refer those decisions to the 3rd umpire! BTW, I haven't had a drop!

If the fireworks don't start soon, knowing that our match winner is somwhere else, I shall be ceasing commentary and heading for home, to finish my packing, for the journey to ..............................

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 17:03

It might get even worse if Hildreth doesn't get runs after keeping his place while Peter Trego has forgone his (unless it's an injury issue). I know which one I'd presently want to bat for my life.



(Sm72)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 17:23

er... anyone any idea why Peter Trego isn't playing?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 17:26

And yep, Diamond, if we're going to pick our Pro 40 team on Pro 40 performance, perhaps Langer should drop himself and go instead for the extra bowling option of Ian Blackwell. Just a thought.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 17:29

We need to be further ahead of the run-rate than we are by the time the spinners come on because, Marcus excepted, playing them is not exactly our forte..

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 18:01

Listening on Somerset Sound now. It all sounds painfully familiar as Swann applies a stranglehold and we lack the savoir-faire to push the ball into the gaps and tick the ball over with ones and twos. This time we've got the seamer, Ealham, applying to the strangle-hold from the other end, too.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 18:17

Anyone going to be watching any Bill Murray films tonight?

[sigh]

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 18:50

James did quite well but went one ball too far against Swann. It's still on but we need lots of two's and one big over.



(Sm72)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:13

Yes, looks like fireworks from both him and Wes. I really thought we were toast when Swann and Ealham were in tandem.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:16

I (the rat) deserted the sinking ship when Tres was out, but I do have to drive to LHR tonight.

Well done to the middle order, which I'm sure will have the ground rocking!

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:20

I deserted the radio when the required rate was up to nine and we were showing no sign of knowing what to do versus Ealham and Swann.

Great recovery. Fantastic stuff from James and Wes. Six sixes.

Take that, Notts.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:23

Well timed; a whole ball to spare.

Well played, especially Wes, James and Arul.

The person who said Arul dropped a catch cannot have been telling the truth. I refuse to believe it. You'll be telling me next that Hallam couldn't throw.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: fRed (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:24

Wow! Well done lads, I wish I'd gone.



Cricket's the winner.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Sloop John B (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:25

What happened guys??

Did we win off the last ball???

Who's the star?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:25

Never in any doubt.Good knock from Wesley

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:28

The best thing about this win was the fact that so many contributed with the bat. We ought to derive more confidence from this win than from the Durham win as that was bascially Banger and Willow stick. This time we got home with numerous batting contributions, including from four of the younger players.

Much more encouraging.

Hopefully James, in particular, will now be lifted for the Surrey game in the week.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:31

Ye of little faith - yes, you know who you are! (Sm14)

Great to see the critical roles played by the likes of Arul, Wes and James - just like beating the Aussies a few years ago!

Am I alone in thinking Wes has actually done pretty well this year when he's had a chance to show what he can do?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Sloop John B (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:33

No SP - I am in total agreement Wes has never let us down.

As I have posted before I think he is our new KP.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 19:40

Actually, I think the tale of the tape this year is that Wes hadn't done much in his limited opportunities in the short-stuff. Certainly, did not do much at Bristol, when I saw him play in the FPT (although was visibly very unhappy with the umpire's decision when he batted.)

But he's often done well in the past, and it's great to see that he's hit his straps today.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 21:46

Please do get to the ground (as well as the gym) on time, Grockle, so that your posters can be given an accurate account of what is actually happening.

Apart from the mistakes over how Shafayet and Wood were dismissed, which you have already corrected, your stand-in from the substitutes bench got it wrong about Swann also.

It was not the `poor ball (full toss)` by Willoughby that he describes, but an extremely clever piece of bowling.

Swann had opened the batting in a pinch-hitting role, and was waltzing down the wicket just about every other ball. On this occasion, Willow saw him coming miles in advance and adjusted his length accordingly so that Swann hit it right on the bottom of his bat, putting up a simple catch to mid-off.

Deep thinkers, these Somerset bowlers.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 21:51

We all know that Wurzel watches a different game to everybody else but it's good to get his views on the game he's watching.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 21:58

I agree it's great to get comments live from the ground,it was quite funny today hearing Wurzham's take on the game.
He says he left when Marcus was out.
My money was on he left after 20 overs as he thought that was the end of the game.
Shame we can't ask him as he's on his way to the airport.
Did anyone ask him where he was going?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Glen House (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 22:05

I'd also like to add my congratulations on a fantastic result - very well played and shows great spirit. All too easy to fall away on occasions like this

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grizzzly (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 22:22

Fantastic result.

Can't say I felt confident when the rate was up around nine an over, so it is just great to see our middle order pacing the reply to perfection.

Really hope we can kick on from here in the Pro 40. Hopefully it will give us the momentum we have been looking for.

Grizzzly

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 10/08/2008 22:29

Yes,a superb result.
We're in a very healthy position in the table after this.
Let's hope this will give everyone a lift and get rid of any self doubt that may have been lingering after a below par week.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Congar (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 00:29

Close win, must have been quite a lot of pressure on Banks at the end.

It would be good to hear that we'll be fielding our strongest team in all competitions (which includes Icool smiley for the rest of the season. Surely they can play all the remaining matches and if not we have a quite a large squad.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 01:11

Didn't see the first part so can't comment on the Swann one - although a couple of professional commentators did say that the only thing Charl did right in his first spell was beat Swann.

The batting performance ebbed and flowed. Craig played well in an unusual role, Marcus looked a bit out of touch today and the captain was just mad!

James took his time and then pushed it along and many of the younger players marshalled Zander to play at their pace - good move dudes.

But it was Wes who rarely flaps who took on the game when we needed to up the pace. Arul couldn't get bat on ball for a lot of his innings so he simply did the next best thing and farmed the strike to Mr Durston.

Rather surprised to see Omari come in in front of Jonah and it was very worrying when Alfonso also came out. In the end it wasn't a controlled finish, it was just a case of 'for heavens sake get bat on ball and run!!'

But overall we did a good job and without Franks' heroics in their innings we would have walked it.

Strange decision but to some extent based on Arul's seeming ability to hold that end up - one over too far - a spinner's lot I'm afraid. Omari also bowled well and put the brakes on - still not convinced though.

Don't be surprised to see Arul in the CC1 side for the Surrey game at the expense of someone else. Good end product, some promising indicators but it isn't there yet and there's still some work to do.

Batting against spinners and working the bowling attack so the right people are in the right places to bowl at the right times in an opposition innings.

Wurzel just got carried away a bit with the Wi-Fi experience I think although I did have to check he wasn't watching the Test on the telly and got confused.



(Sm72)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 01:17

It was a good job those stewards stopped him getting on the pitch to send interview the players.Perhaps he thought he was Bumble?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 06:43

Wretched McDonalds at LHR. I've just written a riposte and the wifi crashed, so you'll have to imagine what I had to say, but Tom should stop playing with Jerry and concentrate on the game! Tarah

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 07:21

Are you ok Wurzel. Have you got the right forum as you message doesn't seem to be cricket related.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 08:23

Back in hotel, waiting for family to get up.

The stewards were strange, yesterday, in front of the OP. I understand keeping stairway clear, but keeping the area in front oof the OP clear, when the corridor is blocked, due to building work doesn't make sense. The stewards kept asking people to move, so maybe a notice would be better? I then stood for 20 minutes, behind the seats, but in front of the banned area not obstructing anyone's view, which was allowed by two stewards. I left temporarily, but when I returned I was told to move. I enquired why and was tol;d it was a sterile area. I explained that the other stewards allowed it, but the guy was obstinate. One of the committee members was also asked to move and he couldn't understand why, but would find out. It's never dull at Somerset.

The Gimblett Mound now seems to be a concrete plinth, perhaps Grockle could shed some light on this (no not torchlight!)?

The scoreboard is unfortunately not very visible from the Exec Club, as some bright spark has put a gantry in the way, but I stand by my earlier reports of the action. Perhaps some other attendees would like to give their views.

The Business Club members are still unhappy about the withdrawal of tea and biscuits and the fact that the safety railings block the view of those sitting on the balconies. Those standing on the balconies, to see over the railings, makes them unpopular with those sitting inside!

Have a nice day everyone (clue)!

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: BristolRob (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 08:38

You probably needed to prove that you were sterile!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:11:08:39:05 by BristolRob .

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 09:11

The 'mound' seems to have been 'shelved' into some kind of concrete step affair. No idea what it is going to finally look like or what the plan is. I think the idea of a grassed mound of earth from agraveyard lost it's appeal - but who knows.

For those of you who seem to think the dual wi-fi was some kind of Grockle plan can I please put your minds at rest. I haven't lost my mind or decided to do some kind of double act. As you can see Wurzel only posted on the forum, under his own steam, without any Grockles logo and from his own choice of laptop.

We may see some winter frontpages from Bagpuss if she chooses to do that (although she's been remarkably quiet over the past few months) or John Fuller if he has things to say but I doubt anyone else will ever get access to the main editing suite.



(Sm72)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 09:17

I don't know if this throws any light on the stewards.

one steward was on fire duty at the bottom of the stairs, it could be because it was pretty full and only one stair in use that they were more active on keeping that area clear.



http://i450.photobucket.com/albums/qq223/imagetony48/Smiley-photographer-animationTony.gif

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 09:34

Yes Grockle the 'Mount' is a big disappointment to me, I had my plastic sheet all ready to sit on to watch the cricket.

I was hoping to take a photo of it but it is in such a mess at the moment I haven't bothered.

As soon as it looks better I will do so.

The retaining wall is being faced with brick to looks like the old wall, It it hard to say what the steps will end up looking like.

On top of the wall will be planters as part of the landscaping. (I asked a workman)



http://i450.photobucket.com/albums/qq223/imagetony48/Smiley-photographer-animationTony.gif

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 10:18

I sat for a brief time (ankle-biter present) at the top of the 'new' stand. I've got to say, it is a great stand - lovely padded seats and a phenomenal view of the game. Very impressed.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 12:02

You got a few close up views of balls flying your way as well Bloke!!

Oh and as an aside. We were number 9th in the top 10 viewed sites on the network yesterday which isn't a position we hold very often - especially in the weekend that the footy season starts.



(Sm72)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:11:12:17:50 by Grockle.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: bloke (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 12:50

Luckily not - we weren't there long enough - that may have put her off for life!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:11:12:51:14 by bloke.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 13:16

Re your two corrections, Grockle, I have conferred with the good folk around me and we all would like to refer those decisions to the 3rd umpire! BTW, I haven't had a drop!


I also referred both descriptions to the people around me before I posted the actual events (already on the frontpage anyway, typed at the time).

I'm so glad you find that your companions in the EBC agree with you (maybe they'd been imbibbing instead) - must have looked away from the Test and the 'networking' for a second to watch the pitch.

I don't know, maybe the safety bar got in the way or the waitress asked for the money for the tea and biscuits at that moment in time and the concentration on the game that the EBC is famous for just slipped a bit.

Unfortunately the people around me (who watch this stuff for a living) didn't agree with your assessment and so neither of your descriptions will appear in any local or national newspaper reports tomorrow!

I think that is as near to a third umpire decision as you are going to get I'm afraid.

Have a lovely holiday and we'll report on what goes on in your absence.



(Sm72)



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:11:23:51:09 by Grockle.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Palairet (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 13:38

Yes indeed, have a great holiday, Wurzel.

Yesterday's play transpired to be a great success story for Somerset's Acadamy; the 'unofficial' acadamy of Millfield School that is, with Hildreth, Suppiah, Durston and Kieswetter all playing important roles.

Where would we be without Millfield?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: MisterMurph (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 16:45

I received the following from Surrey CC:

"You liked Twenty20? You ain’t seen nothing yet. Prepare yourself for NatWest Pro40. It’s got twice the excitement, twice the action and twice the balls."

Just think, if you can double the cricketing entertainment by having 80 overs in a match, instead of 40, then how much cricketing fun would happen in 96 overs in a day...for 4 WHOLE days in a row...I mean, 4 days in a hot tub...I'd be more shrivelled than Ronnie Wood...

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 16:50

With the exception of the game at Old Trafford, where Lancashire had their skulls caved in (no doubt 'only because they did not play as well as they can do,') every Pro40 game yeseterday produced a thrilling finish.

Also, 4 out of 5 toss winners were beaten (including all three who opted to bat first.)

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Mike BOS (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 18:46

A bit late but some photos from yesterday.

The first two is when I don’t get it quite right, the first taken early the second late. (Nobody’s perfect).

http://img398.imageshack.us/img398/3082/mwoodbldsuppiahtakenearsj1.jpg

Matt Wood bld Suppiah – the ball on its way to the stumps.

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/1230/bshafayatbldthomasstumpkk6.jpg

Shafayat bld Thomas – A bit late with this one, it is a surprise how many positions the stumps can get in.

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/1530/wdurstonyoutryplayingthyp1.jpg

Wes Durston – You try playing this shot on one knee.

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/2935/avogeskieswetterhopingvat0.jpg

A Voges – Kieswetter hoping Voges lifts his back leg.

http://img398.imageshack.us/img398/4761/asuppiahshowinghecanplati2.jpg

A Suppiah – I like Suppiah if he is given the right opportunities he can become a good all-rounder.



http://i450.photobucket.com/albums/qq223/imagetony48/Smiley-photographer-animationTony.gif



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:11:18:52:04 by Mike BOS.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Palairet (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 18:51

Excellent photos, Mike.

No need to apologise - we are all indebted to the time and trouble that you take in getting your photos on here.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 20:22

Brilliant as usual Mike.
I think the third Umpire has had a look at Matt Wood's dismissal now.
Very interesting.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 20:40

er.. yes.. would this be a bad time to mention that, looking at that photo, one would not pour cold water on a suggestion that that may have been an attempted sweep/paddle shot?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 11/08/2008 23:49

No problem at all AG except it wasn't,

He was trying to glance the ball to leg and got caught up in a ball that wasn't going where he expected it to which is why he ended up almost falling over it as it bowled him.

Maybe if you had the soundtrack where a number of people then had a debate about why the hell he was the second player to try and play a leg glance to a spinner spearing it in that way you might see the picture in a different light.

But of course it fits wonderfully with the first photo of Shafayet just afer he'd tried a "reverse sweep" and ended up looking back at his stumps from an upright position.

Now if you were there and saw it differently please add your own spin to it by all means. But you'll be arguing with correspondents from the Times, plus local journalists who all had a bit of a giggle about the desciptions of the dismissals from a forum post which I checked with them just to see if my own eyes deceived me.

But don't take my word for it. If you want some kind of official statement from the powers that be before you belive it then pease write and demand one. I saw what a number of other people saw and Wurz saw what the people in the EBC saw.

Take your pick by all means. But I'll tell you what Boycott would say. The papers tell you how it was and it ain't gonna change..



(Sm72)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:11:23:57:12 by Grockle.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 12/08/2008 07:18

The papers tell you what they want you to read. Ciao

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Exiled Tim (IP Logged)
Date: 12/08/2008 07:27

Thanks for your kind comments, folks.

I guess some must have been pm' Grockle, concerned that I (resplendent in my 'Grockles' 'Botham' jumper, on Sunday, might have had access to the editorial. Oh to have such power!

I am now struggling for wireless access, in Italy, but not having much success with the interpretation, but finally I'm back, but battery will soon die!

I understand that Tractor retired to the wine bar, on Sunday, so maybe his taste buds have become less refined, or should that be more? Anyway it was very quiet when i left, apart from the tinkling of teaspoons on China. Only kidding Grockle.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 12/08/2008 09:13

Out is out whatever way you look at it,I'm sure "our" Matt's stats will simply read that he was bowled.
I think looking at the picture it is easy to see why some thought he may have been trying a sweep.If you took your eyes off play for a split second and missed the start of the execution of the shot and just saw that then you would assume that a sweep it was.
It just shows how difficult the life of a reporter can be.
You need eyes in the badck of your head.
And elsewhere.
Otherwise you get these grumpy old men sitting at home arguing the toss.
And plenty more where that came from.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 12/08/2008 09:28

I have a picture at home (from the local rag) of me being bowled having executed what looks like a horrible across-the-line slog to a straight ball. My recollection of the shot was of a straight drive intended to go back past the bowler, but beaten by late inswing which caused me to change my shot - too late!

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 12/08/2008 09:39

Yes, Jim, that's what I concluded as well. If he fell over attempting to leg glance and you looked up one split second too late.. then you would see what the photo shows.

Also, whilst Grockle suggests that it was inappropriate to try to leg-glance Arul spearing it in at leg-stump (because someone else had perished that way,) I would actually submit that, unless Arul was turning it appreciably, a leg-glance would be a logical shot to essay to things speared in at leg-stump. Matt's execution was obviously fairly horrific, however. If Arul's turning it, you're into the realms of leading edge etc, if not? Well, other than the sweep or a purely defensive shot, I'm not sure what else one is meant to do?

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 12/08/2008 09:43

There was a picture of me on the back of the worldwide selling Carmarthen Journal a few years back playing a Test match standard square cut.
Everything was good about the shot,even down the angle of the bat and the steely look in the eyes which watched the ball onto the bat.
The only problem was my whites had split as I played the shot,right in the middle of the groin area exposing something which could have been quite nasty.
Thankfully some editor had spotted it and hastily apllied a wad of Tipex over the worst of the offending area.
It was some split.
That was some exposure.

Re: Notts Part 2 - Sunday
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 12/08/2008 10:47

The papers tell you what they want you to read. Ciao


Yeah but not regionally Wruz and these are the guys who provide game info for the official site, the Gazette and the Post (plus others about the place). Remember? They were the one's you wanted to take as gospel on the Herschell incident?

The papers are what you make them and being there is so much better than reading about it. It's just that sometimes people can be mistaken and the gracious ones go "Yep".



(Sm72)

Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListLog In

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net
 

Somerset Poll

Who is the Player of the Month from the 15th of July to the 15th of August?