Before the new season really does loom into view, it seems appropriate to bid farewell to departing captain Ed Smith, who retired from cricket this winter following both injury and intrigue at Middlesex last season. Howard Moon has written a brilliantly balanced and thoughtful piece which I'm sure will generate a great deal of thought and possibly also comment.
Ed the Duck, Ed0, Smiffy, Smudge: few divided opinion like Ed Smith. Some said he was weak outside off stump, others were shocked he didn’t play more for England. His captaincy style was either Brearley-esque or too autocratic. And his books were applauded by some critics, panned by others, and gave almighty irritation to his team-mates at Kent.
For most of us on the boundary edge, we’ll never truly know how good or bad his technique was, or whether he really did rub people up the wrong way. However, I have rarely let ignorance get in the way of forming an opinion. So, in this spirit: Ed Smith was – for me – one of the most impressive county cricketers of his generation.
It was his history of quiet bloody-mindedness that made him so admirable. This was a batsman who practically bludgeoned his way into the England side in 2003 through sheer weight of runs – 1000 runs by June, and six centuries in consecutive matches; who drove his way to 64 on Test debut, against Ntini, Pollock and co at their peak; who, in late 2004, and only days before cutting all ties with Kent, smashed a stunning one-day century for a team which so clearly hated him; and who last summer, despite breaking an ankle on six, batted on without a runner for thirty more runs to take his team to the brink of victory. (The rest, as they say, is history).
Not a bad looking shot for a man on a broken foot, making history
This was a student who got a double-first at Cambridge while captaining the Blues; an author who found time to pen a riveting diary during a record-breaking summer; a public-school cricketer who wrote about baseball players from the Bronx; and a modern-day Stoic who opted to tough it out at Middlesex despite an awful 2006 (during which, lest we forget, he was dropped – albeit temporarily).
Cricket needs more individuals like Ed Smith. In a world of the anodyne, the sound bite and the media-trained, Smith was a refreshing antidote: a scholar cricketer, as Frank Keating once put it, who could think as well as bat. Perhaps, to my outsider’s eyes at least, it was these thinking qualities which lost him favour at Lord’s last summer. Presumably his eagerness to challenge the status quo won him few friends in the dressing room, but I could be wrong.
In any case, I’ve always felt Smith was underappreciated at Middlesex. He was usually said to be underperforming, but in three full seasons at the club, he hit nearly 4000 first-class runs at 42, chalked up 12 centuries, and generally brought class and experience to an otherwise frail upper-order. Smudge, we’ll miss you. Or I will, at least.
I always found Ed a very polite man. Always came over to speak and ask about the pitch and conditions before a game and always had a good word to say, very different to some other captains and also club officials. Of course the fact that he scored runs at Uxbridge helps, but sometimes it is good to receive praise and Ed was very quick to give it.
Thankfully the new captain is also very likable.
And the new skippers mum and dad are good company too .
Ed's a grand bloke but I can't say I was heartbroken when he decided to call it a day playing wise , good luck to him with his many other interests though .
Being a fellow public school boy from Stowe I can understand how his undoubted superior intelligence may have been wrongly interpreted by many. Straussy too a public schoolboy from Radley commands respect due to many of his public school traits. Cricket needs intelligence, notably at the ECB and it also benefits from players like Ed. He was a genltleman and represented Middlesex with dignity both as player and captain. I wish him all the very best and hope he contributes greatly to the game in the future through his excellent writing.
CrookedFinger Smith was treated shabbily by the club as management caved into player power again.
Here here - said it before, and will say it again. A good thinking skipper. Always set some interesting field positions, captained the side well, and did well at the top of the order. He had another 5 years in him at least, before he was forced out.
Given Joyce, Shah and Strauss have/will be gone for long absences, we could have done with him at the top as a steady hand. He will be sorely missed.
An appropriately generous tribute to Ed - thanks Howard. I don't agree with Shots1992 (and I'm a public school/Oxbridge product too) who is barking up the wrong tree. Anyone who has heard Mr Smith speak will know that he's not "posh" by any means, so I don't think it was his background in itself that annoyed people. In any case, there have been plenty of public school-educated cricketers in recent years - not just Strauss and Dalrymple, but also Matthew Fleming and Alex Loudon (both Old Etonians) who didn't annoy people as much as Ed Smith allegedly did. There have also been players of exceptional intelligence such as Mike Brearley who also didn't annoy people as much as Smith allegedly did. Let's leave class warfare out of this. This was about personalities, not class or education.
Sorry if my comments were misinterpreted. What I was saying is that a certain public school aggorance can rub some people up the wrong way. That is all really. Cricket has moved on and now the game is thankfuly played by many from all walks of life which is mirrored in the England team which is great for the game. I played all my club cricket with state educated lads at Walton-on-Thames and had a brilliant time. There is no longer a class system and in fact the public schools are actively helping with their facilities for the less well off in society.
I see what you were getting at now, and perhaps the old "born to rule" assumption is, or was, part of what got people's backs up. I prefer to have no idea where people were educated and take them as they are. I'm never too keen when people ask casually where you were educated, as it feels like an attempt to establish whether you are part of the same set as they are. Having said that, there can be an inverted snobbery around too, and that's just as bad.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment.
We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals.
We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards.
If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing
abuse@sportnetwork.net