Fozzie turns the clock back over 50 years to report on his introduction to cricket at Lord's. We hear about a thrilling finish with some Middlesex influence.
My friend Rob sent me a photo last week of his brother receiving a coaching award from none other than Brian Close. He said that Close had kept repeating the same story in his presentation speech, which I put down to him now being an octogenarian but which Rob attributed to the long-term effects of the battering he took from Holding and Daniel in 1976.
Talk of Close’s Test swansong brought to mind earlier battles he had had with Windies pacemen, and in particular the part that he played in making me a cricket devotee just 50 + years ago – on 25 June 1963 to be precise, on the final day of the thrilling Second Test between England and West Indies at (fittingly) Lord’s.
This brilliant Windies team, captained by Frank Worrell and featuring the likes of Sobers, Kanhai, Wes Hall and Gibbs, had won the First Test at a canter. They started the Second Test well too, and their first innings of 301 had looked a potentially winning score, but England fought back well to trail by only 4 on the first innings, with none other than Fred Titmus marshalling a recovery by the tail and scoring 52 not out. Batting again, West Indies fought their way to 229, leaving England 234 to win in a day and a half. England lost three early wickets, and after a recovery they suffered a severe blow when Hall broke a bone in Colin Cowdrey’s wrist, ruling him out for the rest of the season. At the time there were no sightscreens at the Pavilion End, so as not to inconvenience the members, but this incident resulted in their introduction the following season.
The match was affected by bad weather throughout, and play finished early on the fourth day and did not resume until 2.20 on the final afternoon, with England 116-3. At the time I was not aware of any of the events summarised above, and I should digress at this point for the benefit of those too young to remember 1963 to explain the broadcasting arrangements back then. BBC2 had not yet arrived, and BBC did its best to fit live Test cricket into the schedule in its sole channel: usually showing the morning’s play, an hour or so in the afternoon and returning at 6 p.m. for the final half-hour of the day. On the afternoon in question my friends and I settled down for children’s TV at 5 p.m. - only to find that BBC had decided to stick with the cricket because of the chance of an exciting finale. My mother heard my snort of disgust, and immediately rushed in to watch. My parents were both cricket fans – Mum is still a TMS devotee – and there must have been something about her enthusiasm that made me stay and watch too. The match had reached a critical stage, with England needing some 50 runs in the final hour but with only four wickets in hand, plus possibly the stricken Cowdrey.
Close and Fred Titmus were batting at the time, withstanding a barrage from the fast bowlers Hall and Charlie Griffith, both of whom bowled practically unchanged throughout the truncated last day. It was mesmerising to watch the loose-limbed Wes Hall bounding in on his thirty-yard run-up before leaping at the crease and, in a flurry of arms and legs, fire short-pitched deliveries into Close, who would either fend the ball away or unflinchingly take the ball in his ribs. No helmets or arm-guards then, of course; and even I, watching the action on a fuzzy black and white TV screen, could sense the drama of the personal duel and the tension as the match moved towards its conclusion.
Close and Titmus had added 45 and brought the target down to just 31 more runs needed when Fred was caught on the leg-side, bringing in Fred Trueman. Trueman had bowled magnificently to take 11 wickets in the match, and this was to be his best season with the bat, scoring two centuries. However, this situation was beyond him. I can still remember Hall’s first ball to him rearing towards him, Trueman jerking backwards with his bat held out, and Deryck Murray took the catch behind. 203-7, and the Gloucestershire off-spinner David Allen came in. (As an aside, it seems particularly strange to recall England picking two off-spinners for a Lords Test in a cold wet June, when we’ve recently seen them go for a single specialist spinner on an Indian turner).
At this point Close changed his tactics and went on the offensive, moving down the pitch as Hall and Griffith approached the bowling crease. The first time this happened Hall was so shocked that he pulled up in his delivery stride and ricked his back. It was totally gripping, with Close alternately connecting with powerful swings of the bat or taking a battering; but it couldn’t last, and eventually a big swing resulted in an edge behind. Close had batted courageously for nearly four hours in making 70, his highest Test score, and he exited bruised but unbowed.
At the age of 38, Derek Shackleton was playing his first Test for eleven years, and batting at number 10 was a rare, albeit forced, promotion for him. Somehow he and Allen hung on, and at the start of the final over an England win was still possible, with eight needed. Two singles taken, and Shackleton facing with three balls left, when Allen sprinted down the pitch for a single that was never there. Shackleton, taken by surprise, set off late, and the ever-calm Frank Worrell gathered the ball and out-sprinted Shackleton to run him out at the bowler’s end.
Nine wickets were down with only two balls left. The TV cameras focused on the pavilion for what seemed an age, before Cowdrey came out holding his bat in his left hand, his right wrist encased in plaster. Apparently he would have batted left-handed if necessary, but fortunately Allen had the strike. Wes Hall put everything he had into the final deliveries, but Allen kept the first out, somehow got his bat on to the second – and I can still hear the fruity tones of Brian Johnston trumpeting “It’s a draw! It’s a draw!”.
And that was it. A single hour of cricket, and I was a devotee for life.
More generally, I think that that Test had the same galvanising impact on the public that England’s win by 2 runs over Australia had in 2005. Both matches followed one-sided defeats and suddenly opened up whole new possibilities for the series ahead. My friends and I were glued to the TV for the rest of the summer, especially when Trueman bowled England to victory in the Third Test. But they were outplayed in the Fourth, and West Indies finally prevailed in a compelling final Test to deservedly win 3-1. A magnificent series, especially as one’s introduction to cricket.
The BBC's genome project now means you can get listings for any day you want (their equivalent of cricket archive!)
My earliest cricket tv memory is a couple of years later. My dad more or less forcing me to watch John Edrich make 310 against New Zealand at Headingley.
My first Close Encounter was the battering he and Edrich received at the hands of W Indies with an attack including Wayne Daniel. I remember a spectator running on pitch offering a giant wide bat.
If we have more articles of this nature , the site may just survive the winter.
The BBC's genome project now means you can get listings for any day you want (their equivalent of cricket archive!)
My earliest cricket tv memory is a couple of years later. My dad more or less forcing me to watch John Edrich make 310 against New Zealand at Headingley.
Thanks, Chunky. Interesting to see that I was a cultural snob even at the age of 10 - the childhood equivalent of choosing a subtitled arthouse movie over a blockbuster.
I remember Edrich's 310 well. It was the culmination of an amazing run of scores, but his next innings was in the First Test against the visiting South Africans, and he was LBW to Peter Pollock for 0. It was a huge shock. In the second innings he was concussed by a buncer early on, and he hardly made another score for the rest of the season.
It is interesting to learn what watching cricket on TV was like in 1963.
I am very happy about the fact BBC have published previous years' schedules in their genome project, although it would be nice if they try to add a feature which compares what was scheduled to what was actually broadcast. That would make for interesting reading if someone wanted to know what programmes were delayed or cancelled whenever it was decided to extend the coverage of a certain event to cover an unexpected event.
I think the BBC ditched their normal childrens programmes during Wimbledon fortnight, as there was always the chance they would stay with the tennis if a match was nearly finished- so cartoons would be a filler they could easily ditch if necessary.
Now- You could have had 'Tuesday Rendezvous' on ITV instead (or were you one of those households that never watched 'the other side)'.
When I was a child, I used to be unhappy whenever the children's afternoon programmes were not broadcast, although it only tended to happen when the Budget was delivered.
When I first heard about the genome project, my first instinct was to test the accuracy of the listings by looking at days when I knew sudden events had caused programmes to be delayed or cancelled. However I felt it would be rude to do that, so I looked at a couple of joyous occasions first, such as the 1966 World Cup final (I doubt the broadcast of Laurel and Hardy began until England's celebrations had finished) and royal weddings.
On Saturday 6th September 1997, I know that BBC One did not broadcast the NatWest Trophy final or the National Lottery draw with Elton John as a guest due to the cricket being postponed by 24 hours and it being felt inappropriate to broadcast the Lottery draws that week. Elton John had a much more important event to attend to that morning.
I went to one day of that test (not the final day).
Apart from the wonderful cricket, including a superb innings by the largely forgotten Basil Butcher, it was the contribution of the first generation England West Indies supporters that made it so special.
Thanks Fozzie, I really enjoyed reading this. It brought back memories of a 9 year old me going through much the same experience as you in front of our small black and white tv in Finchley. Am I going completely mad, or did they go over to the news at 6pm, only for the newsreaders phone to ring and cause him to announce that, due to the exciting finish, the news would be postponed and they were going straight back to Lord's?
My first day of Test cricket was the final day (4th I think) of the final match that summer at the Oval, where I remember sitting on the grass with my dad, who for some reason always went to the Oval Test, despite being a Middlesex man and later an MCC member.
Rohan Kanhai got 70 odd and there was great excitement - I was hooked for life.
Thanks to chunky for the news about Boss Cat - I didn't know that and, while it hasn't kept me awake at night, I had wondered!
The BBC did not break for the closing stages of many Tests. One I can remember is the Oval test of whenever it was when it had rained and England has an hour or so to take five wickets. Derek Underwood was in his pomp and the wickets were taken in the last twenty minutes or so, with David Brown taking two catches almost fielding in the batsman's jock strap. I think that meant the series was drawn, leaving the Ashes with Australia.
That match was also memorable for Basil d'Oliveira's tour place clinching (we thought) big hundred, much of which I witnessed. I did of course have a good batch when I got home, given that it was The Oval.
The only Middlesex connection was Alan Connolly, whom Inverarity was desperately trying to protect at the other end.
1968, Adelaide. The final day was when hundreds of spectators joined the mopping-up exercise to get the ground fit for play. Meanwhile I was huddled over a transistor radio on holiday in the Isle of Arran.
1963 was the first year in which I took an interest in cricket. But while my father watched some of the test matches on television, I was more interested in playing cricket in my grandparents' garden. My first clear memories of cricket on television were from the 1964 series against Australia - not the most riveting of series, but it had me hooked for life.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment.
We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals.
We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards.
If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing
abuse@sportnetwork.net