After Tea Time Mystery


The signs are good

By Lower Pavilion
April 23 2017

Lower Pav reports on an entertaining day, while expanding on tactics after tea that appeared to be a mystery for many

A Good Day’s Cricket but a Tea Time Mystery

 

I drove to Lord’s and arrived nice and early and in a good mood after witnessing first hand,  joyous events in another part of London on Saturday afternoon.

The light seems okay and thankfully we start on time.  Essex 120 for 4 and we are in a strong position. The first over of the day is a maiden by Roland- Jones from Nursery End and Finn is bowling from the Pavilion End.  Bopara and the dangerous Lawrence are batting and it is he who scores the first boundary of the day.

An early wicket.  Bopara out for 6 , caught in the slips by Robson off the bowling of Roland- Jones and Essex are 126 for 5.  Wheater comes in to bat. Lawrence continues to look dangerous to me . Roland- Jones  is bowling well.  Murtagh is now bowling from the Nursery End,  and Franklin comes on to  bowl at the Pavilion End. There follows some decent shots and also some playing and missing. After a slow start, Wheater is beginning to play some shots and this partnership begins to go from strength to strength. Ollie Rayner comes into the attack from the Nursery End.

Lunch arrives and Essex are 213 for 5. A steady mornings play, 83 runs have been added for the loss of just 1 wicket.

We need an  early break through. Murtagh and Finn are now bowling. Lawrence swiftly followed by Wheater arrive at 50 and Essex are 222 for 5. We really need to break this stubborn and rather good partnership. Ollie Rayner comes on to bowl and not for the first time Ollie breaks a partnership. A rather careless shot from Wheater and he is out for 64 very useful runs caught Eskinazi bowled Rayner and Essex are 253 for 6. I should mention that we are -1 which is more than acceptable. Ten Doeschate is now batting. There are more appeals but the umpires remain unmoved. Then another loud appeal for LBW and this time the umpire raises his finger. Ten Doeschate out LBW bowled Murtagh for 20 and Essex are 282 for 7 and we are in a very strong position. Finn now replaces Roland- Jones. Then another wicket . Harmer caught at mid off by Eskinazi bowled Finn who is now bowling well and Essex are struggling at 285 for 8. Then the big wicket Lawrence LBW bowled Finn for a decent 75 and Essex are 288 for 9.

At this point we are -2 which is still okay I think. Finally Finn demolishes  Wagner’s stumps and Essex are all out for 295 and it is Tea.

Now the mystery. Essex are , if my maths is correct, 212 behind. If one can believe the weather reports, Monday afternoon does not look great. Surely we will enforce the follow on. However, it quickly becomes apparent this will not be the case. At this point I must make clear that the people making this decision have a far greater knowledge of cricket than I do and it is also the case that many teams no longer enforce the follow on.

We carry on.  Gubbins and Robson come out to bat and our second innings commences. Both batsmen start to dominate the bowling and we start to amass runs rather quickly.  Essex switch their bowlers around,  but our two batsmen continue to dominate and play some great attacking shots. Robson and Gubbins both go past 50. This is now becoming very good to watch. Eventually Robson tries one big shot too many and is caught in the deep by Lawrence off the bowling of Harmer for a very entertaining 77 and we are 146 for 1. Gubbins then quickly follows caught in the covers by Bopara bowler Harman for an entertaining 64.

There is now some more comments by people around me, should we declare and if so when? We carry on batting. Eskinazi who has come in starts to play some lovely attacking shots and dominates the bowling, eventually he is out for a very entertaining 62.

We declare at 239 for 3  and are 451 ahead . Just 6 overs are left in the day which Essex negotiate without losing a wicket and finish the day 19 for 0.

This was a very entertaining day. However two big questions remain. Should we have enforced the follow on,  and when we did not did we bat too long in our second innings?? The weather forecast suggests some rain from about tea time tomorrow. Hopefully, by then we have bowled Essex out which we are more than capable of doing and we record an important victory.

 

 

 

Bookmark or share this story with:

After Tea Time Mystery
Discussion started by Middlesex till we die , 23/04/2017 23:00
Middlesex till we die
23/04/2017 23:00
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2017:04:25:22:21:11 by BarmierKev.

BarmierKev
23/04/2017 23:10
Thanks for report. I arrived with 6 wickets down and was pleased how we finished the tail off quickly With dodgy forecast tomorrow I felt it was imperative we enforced follow on. If necessary we can judge a run chase rather than losing time out of the game that we may need.

Having chosen to bat I accept we needed to make game safe , but this was far too safe and vital time seemed to be taken out of the game

Barmy Kev
I'm only here for the tele

BeefyRoberts
24/04/2017 00:19
Thanks for detailed report on day I missed.
The mystery of not enforcing follow on will stay with us.
Didn't Franco do same last season,but with a 4th day victory?
The weather looks iffy from 3ish onwards so let's hope it's over by then

chunkyinargyll
24/04/2017 06:44
I have to say from 430 miles away, I would have captained our side very differently from JF. For a start, given we were scoring quickly, I wouldn't have declared on 507 in the first innings. 550 would have left Essex 400 to avoid follow on, and would probably have only taken about 8 overs more batting. That in turn would have left Essex circa 260 runs behind, and follow-on would surely have been enforced.

Once that option was gone, surely enforce follow on of 212. There may be rain or bad light today, meaning we can't be certain we will get 96 overs to take 10. Once that option was gone surely a lead of 400 was enough, which would have given us more overs at Essex last night.

This isn't the positive captaincy I was expecting from the champions. We should have backed our bowlers to take wickets- and if Essex got off to a flyer, well so be it (because of the possibility of a weather curtailed day today) Controversy time- Franko could do with some runs, His captaincy (based on this match) shouldn't guarantee him a place in such a strong side.

Primrose Hillbilly
24/04/2017 10:33
The only things that occurred to me overnight are :

1) the weather is better then the forecast rain, and cooler than yesterday, so our quicks will stay fresh.

2) Is it too early in the season for Essex to think they have to maximise this opportunity, (such as it is) and go for a win, as they will not have (ex) Captain Cook at the top of their order?

We'll all know more in six hours' or so's time!!!!!

lower pavilion
24/04/2017 11:00
Since I did the report last night the weather forecast today has improved, and therefore so have our chances.

Sadly, I can not be at Lord's today but let us hope for a good win

chunkyinargyll
24/04/2017 11:09
You were saying, LP.

Off for rain.

If very little play today, then I suppose it would have been a draw anyway.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net