By Ged
May 21 2006
Three matches of Middlesex’s 2006 County Championship campaign are complete and it’s not been clever so far. Ged takes stock on where the runners and riders stand and concludes on current evidence that historic 1st class averages are better predictors than humans.
Three
matches of Middlesex’s 2006
The following twelve punters are
playing for glory in the Middlesex 2006 prediction game:
¨
Ged
Ladd
¨
Kwiklimey
¨
Hippity
the Green Bunny
¨
Warren Ladd
¨
Lord of the Chairs
¨
Howard Moon (the
Punter formerly known as Crusader)
¨
Akaash
Patel
¨
Janet Davis
¨
Alan Edgar
¨
Percival4
¨
Pistol Pete
¨
Barmy Kev
There are also three computed entries,
by way of benchmarks:
¨
1st Class
Averages (with “norms” for players who don’t have 1st class
averages)
¨
Middlesex 2005
averages (with “norms” for players lacking Middlesex 2005 averages)
¨
Poll of Polls
(average of the 12 real entries).
It will be a bit of a shame if these brilliant
contestants cannot even do better than simply picking previous averages as a
guide! However, only real people can win
a prize, so there’s plenty to play for even if the computer does best!
Ged
has computed the standings table after the first three matches of the first
class season. At the end of the season,
only those players with 8 innings and/or 10 wickets will impact the results, as
explained in the game rules. For the
time being, Ged has used actual
“averages” for any player who currently has any sort of average. Ged has defined this as “more than
one innings and/or more than one wicket”.
|
MIDDLESEX PREDICTION GAME 2006 |
|
||||
|
RESULTS PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PUNTER'S NAME |
BAT SCORE |
BOWL SCORE |
TOTAL SCORE |
RANKING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1ST CLASS AVERAGE |
215 |
56 |
271 |
1 |
|
|
MIDDLESEX 2005 |
288 |
79 |
367 |
10 |
|
|
GED LADD |
257 |
66 |
323 |
5 |
|
|
KWIKLIMEY |
285 |
87 |
372 |
12 |
|
|
HIPPITY |
312 |
77 |
389 |
15 |
|
|
WARREN LADD |
243 |
65 |
308 |
2 |
|
|
LORD OF THE CHAIRS |
291 |
78 |
369 |
11 |
|
|
HOWARD MOON |
270 |
72 |
342 |
8 |
|
|
AKAASH PATEL |
246 |
66 |
312 |
3 |
|
|
JANET DAVIS |
303 |
75 |
378 |
13 |
|
|
ALAN EDGAR |
265 |
66 |
331 |
6 |
|
|
PERCIVAL4 |
248 |
70 |
318 |
4 |
|
|
PISTOL PETE |
304 |
78 |
382 |
14 |
|
|
BARMY KEV |
290 |
73 |
363 |
9 |
|
|
POLL OF POLLS |
271 |
69 |
340 |
7 |
|
At the 3 match stage, the closest
predictor is the 1st class averages.
In fact, the computer is doing better than all the real people on batting
and bowling. But, as benchmarks cannot
win prizes, the prize currently would go to Warren Ladd (no relation), followed
very closely indeed by Akaash Patel. Ged
himself is respectably there in the upper middle order. Pistol Pete and Janet are currently being
held off the wooden spoon slot by Hippity. But of course it is still early days and
there is plenty of time for these positions to change.
If anyone wants to see the spreadsheet
model that includes all the predictions and the formulae for computing the
winners, you are very welcome to do so.
Please e-mail Ged at gedladd@hotmail.co.uk and he’ll e-mail
you the spreadsheet.
Ged
will continue periodically to publish the current standings on the contestants,
depending on his time available and demand to see the standings.
The next update will probably be after
game 8 – i.e. before the