Following the success of earlier Yes/No games, MTWD is proud to present a Grand Slam version of the game. New rules are set out from rule 11 onwards, but basically it is the same fun game. The 2007 trophy was wide open until the end. Grand Slam Yes/No provides a lot more room for the cream to bubble to the top. And what a magnificent gold e-trophy is up for grabs. Go for it.
2008 Grand Slam Yes/No Guess the Player Tournament
Competition Rules
The Rules are as follows:
1/ the cricketer will be current or will have recently retired - he will have played 1st class cricket for Middlesex and/or be a player with some element of international cricket behind them - thus will be assumed to be known to anyone who has a reasonable knowledge of cricket...
2/ each question must be a closed question, i.e. one that can be answered with either a simple “yes” or “no”. E.g. has this player ever played test cricket?
3/ one of the 2 game moderators will endeavour to answer with a yes or no within 24 hours.
4/ If the answer is yes, that player, and that player only, has up to 24 hours to ask a further question.
5/ If the answer is no, the next question will be thrown open to anyone apart from the person who asked previous question.
6/ only one person at a time can ask the questions - so leap in quick each time a new round starts or when the current player receives the answer no
7/ Following this process the person who correctly names the cricketer wins that round.
8/ Anyone who fails to observe these rules will be eliminated from that round..... Persistent offenders will be barred from thread………
9/ Random acts of trivia will occur from time to time, so it is always worth keeping in touch with each round and seeing if you can steal a win.
10/ Barmy Kev has relinquished title to the game and stood down from the elite panel of game moderators in order to take part in this version of the game.
11/ Edits to postings containing questions or guesses will be prohibited - if a contestant makes an edit, that contestant will be eliminated from that round. There will be no amnesties or second chances for a breach of this rule.
12/ If a contestant makes an incorrect guess at the player's name, that contestant is prohibited from chiming in again that round unless or until another contestant makes an incorrect guess at the player's name.
13/ The only acceptable questions are those of a factual nature that the game moderators can reasonably be expected to answer accurately. Facetious questions or questions that the game moderators in their absolute judgement deem to place unreasonable expectations upon them will receive the answer "unfair question" which will count as a "no" against the contestant.
14/ The first contestant to name five players correctly wins the magnificent Grand Slam e-trophy illustrated above.
15/ There might still be grey areas, but the game moderator's decision is final. And remember it is only a bit of fun.
Good luck
Hall of Fame:
Player
Winner
Michael Yardy
Loverboy
Mahela Jayawardene
JC67
Mal Loye
Pistol Pete
Tim Murtagh
Diamond
Dale Steyn
Diamond
Owais Shah
JC67
Simon Cook
JC67
Chris Read
Adelaide
David Nash
JC67
Jacques Kallis
Adelaide
Andrew Symonds
Adelaide
Player L
Player M
Player N
Player O
Player P
Player Q
Player R
RESULTS SO FAR:
JC 67 4
Adelaide 3
Diamond 2
Loverboy 1
Pistol Pete 1
Rest of the World 0
JC WILL TAKE SOME STOPPING, BUT ADELAIDE IS HOT ON HIS HEELS AND OTHERS AREN'T ENTIRELY OUT OF IT!!
Just to confirm following your answer to Diamond's question and previous answers. Can I confirm that he has not played test cricket, has not represented MCCC so, therefore, in line with Rule 1 has played international limited overs cricket?
Actually, rule one would potentially allow the answer no, as I believe the definition in rule one could potentially be met without the player having played international limited overs cricket. But as it happens (and as was rather likely), Player A has played international limited overs cricket.
Just to thank you for the lavish and undeserving praise bestowed upon me by our most benevolent webmeister on my recent victory.
I was of course extremely lucky to win,and apparently my tactics were not to everyone's liking,but as you say Ged,a wins a win for all that,and I have had a little bask in the glory,and read all the messages of congratulations.
But new challenges lie ahead,and as we know many will seek to topple the Champion and snatch the crown from me.
I,m ready for them Ged,Bring 'em on,and the best of luck to all in THE GRAND SLAM.
P.S.Just off to give my trophy a little polish!
Under the new rules, JC, you are now prohibited from asking a further question or having another guess on this player unless/until someone else has an incorrect guess.
I just close my eyes and fantasise Ged,as I polish away with plenty of wrist action.
It should be pretty shiny by now.
Wa our man born outside England?
I think I'm correct in allowing JC's question as he was not allowed to have another go for Player A once he made an incorrect guess. and he came back on Player B after Loverboy got a no.
RULE 12
12/ If a contestant makes an incorrect guess at the player's name, that contestant is prohibited from chiming in again that round unless or until another contestant makes an incorrect guess at the player's name.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:01:03:15:49:40 by comebackgatt.
Once again, for the benefit of newer players, when someone is so unspecific about this type of question, the assumption is that the reference is to first class average. And we use Cricinfo stats as our bible.
While the answer is obvious in the case of some players, it is not obvious in the case of all players. How does one rate Botham's batting average compared with his bowwling average, for example?
Many peoples find of the season last year , a delight to watch perform and now MTHD , one of two MCCC players of the year 2007 ,I give you ladies and gentlemen ,"Dial M "...... Tim Murtagh.
Thought you were about and up for the snatch Kev , as I was , no work today , very quiet . Sorry mate and to JC67 who once again did most of the slog on that one only to hit the wall in the last mile .
Yes, Player G played in the LVCC in 2007 for a county other than Middlesex.
For the avoifdance of doubt, once a contestant has won a particular round anyone can chime in with the first question for the next round. Usually it is the winner of the previous round as they are usually hanging around at the time, but ti doesn't have to be that person.
Ged, are you suggesting that I have nothing better to do with my life than hang around waiting to see if my quess is correct? Ah well if the cap fits I might as well wear it.
I'll take that question to mean "does he play international cricket for a side other than England" rather than "was he born in England", but the question was borderline on being pipped as unfair for ambiguity.
Just to remind everyone that if you guess a name incorrectly, you are then out of that round unless or until someone else guesses the name incorrectly.
Also to remind people that you are your own worst enemy if you couch your questions in convoluted negatives. I actually thought that Adelaide's earlier question deserved a yes, but I could see why ComebackGatt attributed it with a no.
I did recall that rule Ged but can we all have a mod reminder on how recent a "retiree" will be . It's in the mix somewhere but this thing is huge(as the Bishop said to the actress).
On my planet (office) "Has the player never played test cricket?" would definitely not be considered convoluted.
But we're not on my planet!
I'm a bit confused now as to what the answer "No he has" actually meant. I would not object if it is not outside the rules to get it not unclear for not no-one!
Comeback is correct in saying no, as the player has played test cricket. My point was that my first thought was "yes, he has played test cricket". Hence my warning about making questions phrased in the negative very clear.
A suitable testimonial will go up on the published page for this game in the fulness of time - i.e. not during working hours.
Without running a poll on this, please comment on this thread if people want another tournament or if people feel that the game has run its course.
One idea that occurred to me is that no-one yet has achieved a hat-trick (Adelaide nearly did of late) so perhaps we can have a tourny oriented towards that.
Well done indeed JC67,I told you to keep plugging away.
I am of the feeling that this competition in it's current form has now run it's course which is not to imply it could not be reintroduced in the next close season.
Perhaps a more straightforward test of knowledge similar to Pete's Quiz at the moment would appeal to more,with a system designed to give all an equal chance to compete,and remove the frustration and element of pot-luck involved in the Yes/No game.
Thank you Ged and LB for your kind words and LB in particular in getting suspended so reducing the competition, but hold on a minute ''element of pot luck''.
More intuition and skill I would say!
Agree that the it might be put away until next close season as, although it appealed to me, it did not attract a high percentage of our readers.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:01:21:14:52:46 by JC67.
What I meant JC,a game where you do not have to be logged on 24 hours a day in case you miss your chance,nothing wrong with your skill and intuition.
Mr ''10%'',I think you found out that there's more to yes/no than meets the eye.
I envisage something along the lines of one question a day.All answer by PM between an allocated time say 9am-9pm each day so all have an equal chance.
The question setter can set at any time after 9 in the evening for the next day,and after say ten rounds see who's top of the league.
I realise that this involves some work by the those totting up scores,but if the mods took turns in administering on a daily basis,should not be too taxing.
JC ,well done fella , some serious knowledge there and some fine processes of elimination used.
I enjoyed the game it all it's formats and look forward to something similar , as already suggested maybe next closed season while we all wait for the Middlesex action to start in Div One of the LVCC , thanks to Ged and CBG for monitoring the game as well as Kev for coming up with the original idea .
I'll defer to other mod and/or users if you want a more sophisticated game. Yes/no stretches me to the limit time commitment-wise - I really need to concentrate on my work during normal office hours.
Happy for you to run games amongst yourselves if you wish.
OK,if enough show interest,I'll set ten Middlesex based questions,one each day the way I,ve described and present a book prize to the winner.
But first let me know who's willing to play so I don't go to the trouble for nothing.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment.
We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals.
We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards.
If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing
abuse@sportnetwork.net