Unusual Opening For Middlesex


Kartik Volunteers To Open

By Winsky Minor
August 30 2009

Winsky Minor reports on a far from minor day at Lord's, as Middlesex stomp into an excellent position against Gloucestershire. A report on the Ladies Day aspect of this Saturday should follow shortly on MTWD from an appropriate source, but for now you can read all about an exciting day of cricket, including an unusual opening pairing. Many thanks to Jonathan Winsky for the report.

 

On a glorious summer's day which was equally matched by a superb performance by Middlesex, I took my normal seat five rows from the front in the centre of the Grand Stand. Noticeable were the numerous ladies in attendance waiting in anticipation for the free champagne and other goodies which were going to be served later in the morning in the Harris Garden.


Gloucestershire started day 3 on 196-9, but in the fourth over of the morning Tim Murtagh removed Steve Kirby, who took his overnight score from 6 to 18, caught in the slips by Neil Dexter and they were all out for 210 with a big first-innings deficit of 132. Murtagh's final figures were 4-61.


Middlesex started their second innings at 11:25am, but Nick Compton was partnered by Murali Kartik, clearly to cause the minimal disruption to the batting order as Sam Robson was unable to bat having apparently chipped a bone in his elbow in catching Steve Adshead the previous day. Although I am unaware of the severity of his injury, I was not particularly surprised that Robson didn't open as he did not do any more fielding after the catch. The promotion of Kartik exceeded a lot of people's expectations as the pair put on 128 for the first wicket either side of lunch, the partnership coming to an end when Kartik walked past a delivery from Richard Dawson, and was stumped by Adshead on 57.


Next to fall was Adam London who was run out by Adshead for 11 in attempting a second run when looking to increase the scoring rate and Middlesex were 150-2.


Five runs and seven balls later, Compton was caught by Ian Saxelby at midwicket off Hamish Marshall for 83, which came off 131 balls with nine fours. The ball initially dropped out of the fielder's hand, but he caught it at his second attempt.


Dawid Malan fell to Chris Taylor's occasional off-breaks when on 20, playing on, making the score 184-4. Tea was taken seven runs later.


The last session was the most exciting. Dexter pulled a six into the Grand Stand the first ball after tea followed by another pull shot for four the next ball. It was clear the instructions were for Middlesex to get as many runs as possible on the board before a making a declaration. The figure I had in my mind for the declaration was 267 as that would mean Gloucestershire have to chase 400.


With the runs flowing freely for the Middlesex batsmen, Ben Scott lost his wicket trying to up the tempo, edging to Dawson at slip off Saxelby for 22 (226-5) and Gareth Berg followed soon after caught behind off Kirby for 7 (237-6).


This brought Shaun Udal to the crease, and he scored 26 off 15 balls including two sixes, one of which cleared the Grand Stand. He enjoyed himself so much that he batted on past 267, but when he was caught by Alex Gidman off Kirby to take the score to 273-7 he declared, meaning that Gloucestershire would have to get 406. Dexter chipped in with a handy unbeaten 39.


This left 16 overs for Gloucestershire to negotiate. Rob Woodman hit the third ball of the innings for four, but the next ball was lbw to Murtagh.


Two balls later Marshall was caught behind by Scott for a duck and Murtagh had taken two wickets in an over.


In the eighth over of the innings the score became 21-3 as Gidman was adjudged lbw to Steve Finn on 7.


Gloucestershire closed on 55-3, with 351 still required, while Middlesex need seven more wickets to secure a first home win in eleven attempts.

Bookmark or share this story with:

Unusual Opening For Middlesex
Discussion started by Middlesex till we die , 30/08/2009 06:38
Middlesex till we die
30/08/2009 06:38
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2009:09:06:07:38:39 by Ged.

Jonathan Winsky
30/08/2009 09:31
I think there are many reasons why this report is not as good as my two previous reports (day 1 of match v Surrey and day 2 of match v Essex). One reason is because I was kind of hopeful that my dad would help me, but he only gave me help in certain parts and I grew frustrated at this. Another reason is because unlike the two previous days for which reported, I had Match of the Day at 10:30pm, and the fact I had still not completed it by then made me feel more frustrated (I think I finished and submitted this report at about 12:50am, long after my dad had gone to bed). Also, I did not feel much emotion or depression when Middlesex lost wickets yesterday as the match situation demanded scoring runs rather than keeping wickets in hand, and this lack of emotion was something that also frustrated me.

I did not feel there was much to report on yesterday apart from the wickets. By the time the report came to the final session, when Neil Dexter hit ten runs off the first two balls of the session, Shaun Udal cleared the Grand Stand (well, actually everyone apart from my dad seems to claim he merely found the top tier) and then Middlesex took three wickets before the close, I was unwilling to change the tempo and style of the report as that wouldn't look right, and also I just wanted to get to bed so I can have sufficient energy to not feel tired during my attendance of the final day today.

I am sorry if anyone is disappointed by this report.

BarmierKev
30/08/2009 10:10
Enjoyed report. Only criticism reading it is making me late for my journey to Lords.

Barmy Kev
I'm only here for the tele

Haringey Racer
30/08/2009 18:52
Quote:
Jonathan Winsky
I am sorry if anyone is disappointed by this report.

If anyone is disappointed, I suggest that they volunteer (to the usual address) to do the next one.

Don't put yourself down Jonathan.

dingy bags
30/08/2009 20:01
Fine report, really informative for anyone not there and greatly enjoyable if, like me, you were. I lost the flight of the enormous Shaggy six; didn't realise it had gone so far (although they had to send for a replacement ball).

Many thanks, JW.

The Diamond ruled ok
30/08/2009 21:01
Just like being there JW . Hang on a mo , I was .

This Thread has been closed
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net