Middlesex Ashes Captains - Gubby Allen Part 1 of 2


Gubby

By Seaxe Man
October 30 2010

To celebrate the start of England's Ashes tour, Seaxe Man continues his occasional series (started last winter) reviewing the careers of Middlesex Ashes captains.  Last winter we published Stoddart and Warner (links at end of this feature) - now we continue with Part A of the Gubby Allen story.  Many thanks to Seaxe Man for these detailed pen pics.


G.O.B.Allen (Gubby) Part 1 of 2


The next in the series of pen-portraits, is of Gubby Allen. A fast bowling all rounder, who along with Voce and  Larwood comprised the three man pace attack, on Jardine’s 1932/33 series in Australia.


The 1932/33 series was known as the Bodyline Tour.


Jardine saw this as a way of countering the threat of Don Bradman, then, the top Test batsman in the world. His batting average of  99.96 remains the best ever..


It is difficult to imagine, that it will ever be bettered.


As far as Jardine was concerned, his leg theory tactics worked. The series being won by England, 4 matches to one..


This at the time, created a fair few ructions which eventually reached the highest governmental levels in both countries.


Allen however, was reluctant to carry out Jardine’s leg-theory bowling, regarding it, as unsportsmanlike, according to the historical write-ups of that series.


For Allen, (being an amateur, as was Jardine),  it was probably easier for him to question Jardine’s tactics as he reportedly did, rather than the professionals, Larwood and Voce, who had more to lose.


On a personal note. I once shared a bench with Gubby Allen, back in the mid eighties, watching a second eleven match at Uxbridge. I found him to be an affable companion, happy to talk cricket.


In recent times, what was formerly known as Q Stand, at Lord’s, which is to the left of the Pavilion, when viewed from the Nursery End, was renamed The Allen Stand in his honour.


This stand is on two levels, the lower of which now houses The Middlesex Room.


Listed in Wisden as: Allen, George Oswald Browning b. Bellevue Hill, Sydney, Australia. 31 July 1902. d. 29 November 1989.


Allen was a little unusual in that he was an amateur all-rounder. In his pomp, generating a fair bit of pace and was a handy lower middle order batsman to boot.


You can find his career statistics on Cricket Archive here:


http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Players/0/559/559.html


If you click on “List of matches and more detailed statistics you can see his stats for each team and against every opponent. 


He played in 25 Tests, captaining in 11 of those. He captained against Australia in the 1936/37 series.


His Test record can be summarised as follows - 750 runs at just over 24.  81 wickets at just over 29. 


The above figures say, he was a pretty handy player at top level. Bearing in mind, as an amateur. He was forced to drop out of series due to business commitments on frequent occasions.


For Middlesex he played too infrequently to make it onto either, the batting or bowling lists in terms of figures.


However he does get on the County’s record list, taking all 10 Lancashire wickets at Lord’s in 1929.  Analysis 10 for 40.


Australia had regained the Ashes in 1934 on their tour of England by 2 matches to 1, after their loss in the Body Line Series of 1932/33. They were not to be defeated again until 1953.


On Allen’s  watch, he won the first two Tests and then succumbed in the last three.


This was the first occasion when a series had been lost after winning the opening two Tests.


He was of course unlucky, in that, in the opposition’s ranks, was the greatest Test batsman of all- time Don Bradman.


Bradman after a slowish start, unfurled his run-machine ability in Tests 3, 4 and 5, and that pretty much was the difference.. Bradman also enjoyed handy support from Jack Fingleton, Stan McCabe and Badcock.


So we fast-forward from the turn of the 20th century to the 1936/37 Ashes Tour of Australia to catch up with the next Middlesex player to captain England in these matches.


It  was to be 40 years, before the honour was to be repeated.


Gubby was accompanied on this tour by two other Middlesex men. The amateur leg break bowler and lower order batsman, R W V Robins and the professional Jim Sims, also a leg break bowler and late order slogger.


Robins himself captained on three occasions against New Zealand, He scored a single Test century (108) and took 64 wickets at 27.46 in his 19 Test career.


So a useful performer at top level.


Sims had a more modest Test Record of 4 matches, taking 11 wickets at 43.63.


Though like his later contemporaries Compton, Edrich and Jack Robertson.


The advent of WW2 took a big chunk out of their careers when they were in their pomp.


Both Robins and Sims had huge records at county level.


J.M.Sims lies fourth in the all-time list of Middlesex bowlers, with 1257 wickets at 25.33.


Only Fred Titmus, J T Hearne and J W Hearne stand ahead him.


R.W.V Robins lies 20th on that list with 669 wickets at 22.28. He being an amateur, almost certainly meant, that he played less than he might have liked, due to business commitments.


He later served as a Test Selector.


His son Charles, also played for Middlesex in the Sixties, later serving on the Committee, plus in recent times, doing a stint as President of The Club, if memory serves me correctly.


Charles earnt his spurs with yours truly, as a true Man of The Middle, when at the 1981 AGM, the Committee were being taken to task, by one speaker, over the decision, to replace Vincent van der Bijl, with Jeff Thomson as the overseas player for the 1981 season.


The ‘critical’ speaker saying ‘that Yorkshire’, as was their wont back then ‘ did not employ overseas players’.


Charles Robins reply in his role as Cricket Committee Chairman: was to urge the speaker to ‘join Yorkshire’. I don’t think the offer was taken up.

 

To be continued in part 2, when you will read all about Gubby Allen's Ashes matches as England Captain.

Bookmark or share this story with:

Middlesex Ashes Captains - Gubby Allen Part 1 of 2
Discussion started by Middlesex till we die , 30/10/2010 08:20
Middlesex till we die
30/10/2010 08:20
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010:11:14:11:56:46 by Ged.

Vic.
30/10/2010 10:10
Thanks S-M, always good to read about players who one has not actually seen. Like many others, I have read huge amounts covering the "bodyline" series and can only wish that I had been sat on that bench at Uxbridge with you, to hear a first hand account. Did he recall those times to you?
Vic.

Vic.
30/10/2010 10:15
Looking at the Grockles site, an intereting link towards the bottom of the "scorecards to remember" thread.

BeefyRoberts
30/10/2010 11:23
Nice one SM,another good read and hard work on your side,look forward to next part.

The Diamond ruled ok
30/10/2010 13:58
Cheers SM , a brightening read to a dull Saturday , looking forward to part two .

dingy bags
30/10/2010 14:30
Great stuff - reckon bodyline will ever be seen at Uxbridge Vic?

adelaide
30/10/2010 15:32
SM - Fascinating stuff. I just wish I had the knowledge to put similar pieces together.


Adelaide

Vic.
30/10/2010 16:43
Quote:
dingy bags
Great stuff - reckon bodyline will ever be seen at Uxbridge Vic?

Not on the field DB.

Jonathan Winsky
31/10/2010 00:18
Quote:
Vic Demain
Looking at the Grockles site, an intereting link towards the bottom of the "scorecards to remember" thread

That thread can be found here

I feel relieved to see that it is not only on MTWD that threads often go off-topic. The Scorecards to remember thread is supposed to be about scorecards that Somerset supporters look at with great affection, yet they end up talking about the future of the Bath festival.

I'll give them two 'Scorecards to remember':

Somerset v Middlesex at Weston-super-Mare, 1924: Somerset 82 (Allen 7-32), Middlesex 317 (Allen 33), Somerset 208 (Allen 1-43). Middlesex win by an innings and 27 runs.
Somerset v Middlesex at Bath, 1949: Middlesex 193 (Allen 91), Somerset 104, Middlesex 140, Somerset 193 (Allen 3-39). Middlesex win by 36 runs.

I enjoyed reading Seaxe Man's article.

pantherlike
31/10/2010 07:46
Well researched and written there S-M.

Just a question: I've always wanted to know who was first to cop the moniker 'Gubby'. Does it indeed originate with our decorated former skipper?

Looking forward to part II.

Jonathan Winsky
31/10/2010 10:04
I have also long wondered how the player came to be called 'Gubby' Allen. It could be due to someone having a similar thought-process to what I have when I see the word 'Bejam' appear in the name 'BJM Scott' as Allen's initials were 'GOB' (George Oswald Browning), so someone probably somehow saw the word 'Gubby' appear. I am sure that he would rather be called 'Gubby' than 'Gobby'!

He became Gubby Allen CBE in 1962 then Sir Gubby Allen CBE in 1986.

Seaxe_Man
31/10/2010 13:19
Vic. I was wary of broaching that subject with Mr Allen. The Bodyline Series remains a touchy subject to this day in Anglo-Australian relations.

So I thought,better let 'sleeping dogs lie', especially with G.O.B.Allen then being in this eighties.

It was a warm and pleasant day as I recall, and I did'nt want the old boy to get hot and bothered. He was also checking out the then second eleven talent I suspect.

But I suppose, looking back, an opportunity missed.

Pantherlike. I suspect as JW hints, that Gubby was a corruption of his initials.

Therefore, he must be the originator.

Vic.
31/10/2010 16:13
Thanks S_M, admire your tact. It has long been an aim of mine to talk with someone who witnessed the bowling of Harold Larwood but alas, probably not to happen.
Best I heard of was Frank Tyson.

Jonathan Winsky
31/10/2010 16:52
It has long been an aim of mine to talk with any professional cricketer but alas, I have little social skills.

I do not know enough about Sir Gubby Allen's career to be able to make much of a positive contribution to this thread.

Primrose Hillbilly
31/10/2010 20:47
Two possibly interesting sidelines here.

The dinner hosted by Arthur Carr, the Notts captain, which Jardine, Larwood and Voce attended, where Jardine asked Larwood if he could maintain a relentless leg stump line during what then were 8 - ball overs - does indicate a degree of premeditation in Jardine's tactics, to which Gubby Allen famously was not party. However,the leg theory attack was not in itself a unique feature of cricket then, because of the LBW law that applied, such that a ball pitching outside off stump could not get a batsmen out LBW. Thus, aiming at leg stump was a fair ploy in itself.

It was only the leg stump attack, and the frightening pace and accuracy of Larwood that created problems all of their own.

And, of course, if you are bowling at leg stump, you are going to place fielders accordingly.

Allen was first change in 3 Tests, but opened the bowling with Larwood in the 3rd and 4th Tests, so would have been able to swing the new ball before it lost its shine and became easier to play, hence the switch to the leg stump line.He thus didn't need to bowl leg theory then, because his line of attack was the traditional one.

Whatever he did, said or thought about Bodyline bowling, Jardine still picked him in the side, so he must have been worth his place.

A second point about G O B Allen is his involvement in the d'Oliveira affair, when he was - I think presidnet of the MCC or chair of the selectors who initially elected to leave d'Oliveira out of the arty to tour South Africa after his 158 at the Oval and some useful wickets.

Different times, different times.

His stats make it look like he'd have been useful in T20 !!!!!!!

kimmy
01/11/2010 09:23
Great work SM, looking forward to the next part...

Kimmy

patsy H
02/11/2010 07:24
Really good read thanks S M

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net