Trott has the runs against overrated Middlesex bowlers


Look familiar?

By London Leprechaun
April 19 2016

London Leprechaun's report on day 3 is, yet again, dominated by one thing - you can guess what I think. One day we might not spend so mcuh time on these matters. But for the moment read on if you dare.

I really did not want this report to turn into yet another one dominated by the over rate issue, particularly as we started the day in such a good position and two early wickets from TRJ who bowled beautifully in the morning added to our high hopes for the match. But a swift decline in the over rate from just -2 overnight (an overnight  rescue act from Don) to -4 turned this day on its head and quite probably cost us victory. Either side of lunch saw, Franklin,  Voges and Malan bowling overs very speedily but not very effectively. Warwickshire took full advantage and from 171/6 with the follow on a distinct possibility, their innings began to prosper.  We got our over rate back to a red nought just in time for the new ball to be taken. Within 8 overs we were back to -1, within the hour to -3.  This was obviously not the only reason the match turned but the loosening of the pressure on the run rate helped Warwickshire first defy the threat, and then prosper in the afternoon sunshine. This is not the first time we have lost control of a match in rescuing the over rate. Is it too much too ask that this will be the last? PLEASE!! 

Having said that, Trott was a delight for his double hundred (when did two players get 200 in the same match)? Some of his shots were exquisite and with the help of the dogged Barker, and then some annoyingly chirpy batting from Patel and Hannon-Dolby he thoroughly deserved his score. It was one of those days when you just have to recognise a very special innings and batsman.

Having said that, and separate from the over rate issue, I do wonder if we missed a trick by not having some more variety in the attack.  On a beautifully sunny afternoon, on a pitch that looked pretty placid most of the time, could an Ollie Raynor or even a Paul Stirling have done something to break up the rhythm of the batsmen - especially when they were well set.

Having said that this match has many of the hallmarks of typical Lord’s pitches over the years: does a bit in the mornings; new balls can be a bit tricky but as the match goes on tends to die a bit. So although we lost a couple of wickets in the late afternoon session, Robbo - who looks in consumate control, and Compo who looked determinedly dogged, steadied things enough to calm any nerves - at least until we see how things go in the morning.

And, sorry to harp on, but just one final note on the over rate. Warwickshire started the Middlesex 2nd innings on  a red zero. With the opening bowlers on they went from a red zero to a green zero and stayed there. So we did not even have that late a finish. Enough said?

Bookmark or share this story with:

Trott has the runs against overrated Middlesex bowlers
Discussion started by Middlesex till we die , 19/04/2016 21:22
Middlesex till we die
19/04/2016 21:22
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016:04:22:07:40:44 by BarmierKev.

BarmierKev
19/04/2016 21:34
While this a good report it is painful reading. It happens every year , mentioned at forums/AGMs yet is still a problem. No other counties have this problem, can't we sort it.

Barmy Kev
I'm only here for the tele

BeefyRoberts
19/04/2016 21:44
Well reported LL,The over rate will always be questioned by all,until,as you say,it's finally sorted out.
We had our own Robbo,and Trott showing great batting and a joy to watch and appreciate on both sides.
A slender lead into the last day,is the draw still favourite?
One thing as well...Was expecting a lot of noise and maybe interruptions from the building works,but,not much really and plenty being done.
Looking from behind the pavilion,the new stand appears to be going back further than previous.

Another enjoyable day of cricket.

chunkyinargyll
19/04/2016 21:47
Of course we can sort it.

Drop Toby Roland-over-rate in to the seconds, and tell him to shorten his run up if he wants to get back in the firsts.

Will anyone Fraser/Scott/Voges between them be brave enough to do it?

Probably not.

Fozzie
19/04/2016 21:47
Fully agree with all this, LL, except on one point - I wouldn't agree that Franklin gets through his overs speedily. IMHO he offered a double negative of offering no threat and having no impact on the over rate.

Seaxe_Man
20/04/2016 08:26
A good report LL and was the game I watched. Indeed the make up bowlers looked ineffective. Mala did trouble them slightly in his first two overs but not beyond.

That said, Trott's innings was chanceless and we never looked like getting him out.

Barker's was more fortuitous, a number of edges evading all.

Your summation of the character of the Lord's pitches also very accurate and mirrors my own thoughts.

With no third man. a helluva of a lot of runs leaked through there.

With the ball seldom beating the bat, three slips, used a lot of the time, was a luxury.

lower pavilion
20/04/2016 11:45
A good report

I was at Lord's for most of the day yesterday in the pavilion and had a good time, though it did get rather cold after tea.

The wicket seems to be getting easier and easier. Trott like Robson when we batted, dominated the bowling and batted superbly.

The slow over rate is irritating, but does not annoy me as much as it clearly does other people.

If we were to win the title with these group of players, our slow over rate will not worry anyone.

Putting my optimisic hat on. I think this is our best 4 day side for some years.However, this is a very competitive division and injuries and call ups could of course change everything.

A draw in this game is still a firm favourite but if we were to lose some early wickets this morning then things could get a little difficult. This is a good Warwickshire side and we have to be careful.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016:04:20:11:49:36 by lower pavilion.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net