Division Two - runs scored

By New Boy 2
December 30 2022

A fascinating delve into runs scored per team.

Looking at the total number of runs scored in last season's Division Two, I was surprised that Middlesex came second bottom of the table.

These totals are by my own calculations as I grew bored trying to drag the data out of Cricinfo:

Pos Team Runs
1 Sussex   8082  
2 Derbyshire   7863  
3 Nottinghamshire   7811  
4 Glamorgan   7501  
5 Durham   7239  
6 Leicestershire   7172  
7 Middlesex   6978  
8 Worcestershire   6643  

 

On one hand, it's surprising that we scored so few runs, relatively speaking - 14% fewer than Sussex, and managed to get promotion.

On the other hand, wining a county game is only possible for a team taking 20 wickets (19 in unusual circumstances such as Notts v Durham on the last day) so while runs are vital, wickets are pivotal. It seems at first sight that the wicket-taking of TRJ, Dial-M, Tom Hand Ethan who all took 25+ wickets, gave the team sufficient advantage that we didn't need to go chasing runs to win, Or that we knew we could take wickets to win when our run advantage wasn't as high as we might have hoped.

You may, of course, have a different view on this.

 

 

Bookmark or share this story with:

Division Two - runs scored
Discussion started by Middlesex till we die , 30/12/2022 12:13
Middlesex till we die
30/12/2022 12:13
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2023:01:29:12:05:23 by BarmierKev.

Reply Quote Report
BarmierKev
30/12/2022 13:13
Obviously bowling and batting are key elements. However, you don't win matches by scoring shed loads of runs , but you do by taking wickets.

Oh and MTWD have been bought 2 weeks + thanks to this.

Reply Quote Report
adelaide
30/12/2022 13:18
If you don't concede a lot of runs you don't need to score a lot, I suppose. It also depends on the pitches that you play on and our home pitches, while less bowler-friendly than in previous years, are far away from some of the 600 plays 600 featherbeds seen elsewhere.

I'm reminded slightly of the football stat about teams who win most points from a losing position. If you are rarely behind you are going to be near bottom on that.


Adelaide

Reply Quote Report
dnb
31/12/2022 10:49
Another way of looking at this is to examine the final table.

Sussex finished 7th on overall points, on batting points, on bowling points, on most wins and on fewest losses. Overall a pretty solid 7th out of 8 on what counts!

By contrast Middlesex finished 2nd on overall points, =1st on batting points, =3rd on bowling points, =2nd on most wins and =1st on fewest losses which for me is a solid 2nd overall.

As others have said scoring shedloads of runs isn’t a good strategy if they are not delivering points and wins. I recall that there were a lot of runs scored at Hove last season and also that the Sussex bowling attack seemed at times to be very weak.

Reply Quote Report
New Boy 2
31/12/2022 15:00
Quote:
adelaide
I'm reminded slightly of the football stat about teams who win most points from a losing position. If you are rarely behind you are going to be near bottom on that.

Adelaide

That is very true, and it's a regular issue with modern-day media statistics: they reflect correlation rather than causation.

Reply Quote Report
Sillyp0int
31/12/2022 19:30
You reckon our batting is too weak for Div 1?

Reply Quote Report
New Boy 2
31/12/2022 20:26
Quote:
Sillyp0int
You reckon our batting is too weak for Div 1?

Who are you asking?

If it's me, then I didn't say anything of the sort. I merely observed that we were promoted with the second lowest total of runs; and reinforced the point that wickets are more valuable in four-day county games than runs.

After all, if you can't take 20 wickets you can't win a game.

Reply Quote Report
Seaxe_man1
02/01/2023 20:09
Thanks New Boy..Dragging that info out takes a lotta time. Our top four looked pretty strong once Malan arrived..Simmo handy for runs these days. The Sussex batting is way better than their bowling without Robinson. Had they had a couple of more like him would have been a threat.

Reply Quote Report
Goto: Forum List•Message List•Search• Log In
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net